Cholinergic modulation of frequency receptive fields in auditory cortex: I. Frequency‐specific effects of muscarinic agonists

Previously we reported that acetylcholine (ACh) and acetyl‐beta‐methacholine (MCh) modify responses of neurons in auditory cortex to individual frequencies. The purpose of this study was to determine whether muscarinic agonists produce frequency‐specific alterations or general changes in cellular responses. Frequency‐specific modifications would be evident in alterations of frequency receptive fields (FRF) that differed across frequencies while general effects would be seen as changes that were more or less the same over frequencies. Responses of single neurons to designated sets of tones were recorded in the auditory cortex of chronically prepared awake cats before, during, and following ejection of ACh or MCh by iontophoresis or micropressure using multibarrel micropipettes. Frequency receptive fields were determined by presenting isointensity tones across a range of frequencies including the cell's best frequency (BF) to tone onset. FRF for “off” and “sustained (through)” responses were also determined quantitatively. The effects of ACh and MCh were predominantly frequency‐specific (77%, 39/51 cells); general changes (19%, 10/51) and no effects (4%, 2/51) were less likely. Frequency‐specific effects involved both facilitation and reduction of the same response component to different frequencies within the same neuron. For responses to tone onset (but not “through” and “off” responses), agonists were more likely to produce a decrease at the BF while simultaneously increasing responses to other frequencies. Agonists could increase or decrease frequency selectivity. Effects of agonists could be blocked by atropine, suggesting involvement of muscarinic receptors.

[1]  K. Krnjević,et al.  The mechanism of excitation by acetylcholine in the cerebral cortex , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  W. S. Rhode,et al.  Physiological study of neurons in the dorsal and posteroventral cochlear nucleus of the unanesthetized cat. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  R. Dykes,et al.  The effects of acetylcholine on response properties of cat somatosensory cortical neurons. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  A. Starr,et al.  Acoustic and nonacoustic factors modifying middle-ear muscle activity in waking cats. , 1963, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  K. Krnjević,et al.  Acetylcholine‐sensitive cells in the cerebral cortex , 1963, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  Norman M. Weinberger,et al.  Classical conditioning rapidly induces specific changes in frequency receptive fields of single neurons in secondary and ventral ectosylvian auditory cortical fields , 1986, Brain Research.

[7]  J. Miller,et al.  Response pattern complexity of auditory cells in the cortex of unanesthetized monkeys. , 1974, Brain research.

[8]  M M Merzenich,et al.  Representation of cochlea within primary auditory cortex in the cat. , 1975, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  R. Dykes,et al.  Transient and prolonged effects of acetylcholine on responsiveness of cat somatosensory cortical neurons. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  R. Dykes,et al.  Acetylcholine permits long-term enhancement of neuronal responsiveness in cat primary somatosensory cortex , 1987, Neuroscience.

[11]  N. Weinberger,et al.  Muscarinic agonists modulate spontaneous and evoked unit discharge in auditory cortex of cat , 1988, Synapse.

[12]  N. Weinberger,et al.  Cholinergic modulation of frequency receptive fields in auditory cortex: II. Frequency‐specific effects of anticholinesterases provide evidence for a modulatory action of endogenous Ach , 1989, Synapse.

[13]  A. Gallant,et al.  Nonlinear Statistical Models , 1988 .

[14]  F. Mosteller,et al.  Data Analysis and Regression , 1978 .

[15]  M. Goldstein,et al.  Single-unit activity in the primary auditory cortex of unanesthetized cats. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  D. Collerton,et al.  Cholinergic function and intellectual decline in Alzheimer's disease , 1986, Neuroscience.

[17]  J. Deutsch,et al.  Cholinergic Excitability and Memory: Animal Studies and their Clinical Implications , 1979 .

[18]  L. Goodman,et al.  THE LACK OF CEREBRAL EFFECTS OF d-TOBOCURARINE , 1947, Anesthesiology.

[19]  Josef M. Miller,et al.  Single cell activity in the auditory cortex of the unanesthetized, behaving monkey: Correlation with stimulus controlled behavior , 1975, Brain Research.

[20]  A. Sillito,et al.  Cholinergic modulation of the functional organization of the cat visual cortex , 1983, Brain Research.

[21]  S. Zornetzer,et al.  The mnemon and its juices: neuromodulation of memory processes. , 1983, Behavioral and neural biology.

[22]  REFLEX RESPONSE TO CLICKS OF CAT'S TENSOR TYMPANI DURING SLEEP AND WAKEFULNESS AND THE INFLUENCE THEREON OF THE AUDITORY CORTEX. , 1964, Archives italiennes de biologie.

[23]  R. Nicoll,et al.  Acetylcholine mediates a slow synaptic potential in hippocampal pyramidal cells. , 1983, Science.

[24]  C. Woody,et al.  Correlated effects of acetylcholine and cyclic guanosine monophosphate on membrane properties of mammalian neocortical neurons. , 1979, Journal of neurobiology.

[25]  R. Hodes Electrocortical synchronization resulting from reduced proprioceptive drive caused by neuromuscular blocking agents. , 1962, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[26]  D. Fambrough Acetylcholine Receptors , 1974, The Journal of general physiology.

[27]  W. R. Webster,et al.  Studies of peripheral gating in the auditory system of cats. , 1972, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[28]  D P Phillips,et al.  Responses of single neurons in physiologically defined primary auditory cortex (AI) of the cat: frequency tuning and responses to intensity. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  T. Tsumoto,et al.  A functional role of cholinergic innervation to neurons in the cat visual cortex. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  N. Weinberger,et al.  The relationship of the cochlear microphonic potential to the acquisition of a classically conditioned pupillary dilation response. , 1976, Behavioral biology.

[31]  Frederick Mosteller,et al.  Data Analysis and Regression , 1978 .

[32]  Roger A. Nicoll,et al.  The pharmacology of cholinergic excitatory responses in hippocampal pyramidal cells , 1984, Brain Research.

[33]  D Sutton,et al.  Single Cell Activity in the Auditory Cortex of Rhesus Monkeys: Behavioral Dependency , 1972, Science.