IMPORTANCE OF SIDEBAR-BONE SPACING DURING THE APPLICATION OF PERTROCHANTERIC FIXATOR ON FEMORAL INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURE MODEL; COMPARISON OF THE BIOMECHANICAL EFFECTS USING FINITE ELEMENT METHOD

Many unwanted traumas occur in daily life, the result of which may be intertrochanteric fractures in the musculoskeletal system. An intertrochanteric femoral fracture is a serious trauma which can lead to pneumonia, pulmonary embolism or death. Therefore, accurate and stable fixation of these fractures is necessary. Schanz screws with a pertrochanteric fixator body are used for the stabilization of intertrochanteric fractures. The stability of fractures created by external fixators is dependent on the frame and bone interaction. The distance between the fixator body and the bone, called "sidebar-bone spacing", is one of the most important aspects of fracture stability. The primary objective in the treatment of these fractures is to maintain the stability of the fracture in the reduction position to allow early mobilization. In this study, an intertrochanteric femoral fracture was fixed with a pertrochanteric fixator, then the effect of sidebar-bone spacing on the fracture line under axial loading was analyzed using AnsysWorkbench software. Stress and strain values on the fracture line and schanz screws were calculated to understand this effect according to the von-Mises criteria. The sidebar-bone spacing was selected as 8, 6 and 4 cm. The von-Mises stress value on the fracture line decreased as the distance between the fixator body and the bone decreased, although strain values increased. In conclusion, decreasing the sidebar-bone spacing in the pertrochanteric fixator used on hip fractures provides stronger stabilization, and demonstrates safer axial loading.

[1]  Li-Chiang Lin,et al.  Temperature Rise Simulation During a Kirschner Pin Drilling in Bone , 2009, 2009 3rd International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  N. A. Christodoulou,et al.  External Fixation of Select Intertrochanteric Fractures With Single Hip Screw , 2000, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  M. Abdelkhalek,et al.  External fixation of intertrochanteric fractures in elderly high-risk patients. , 2009, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[4]  Y. Kabukcuoglu,et al.  [Management of osteoporotic pertrochanteric fractures with external fixation in elderly patients]. , 2008, Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica.

[5]  Pankaj Pankaj,et al.  The importance of lag screw position for the stabilization of trochanteric fractures with a sliding hip screw: A subject‐specific finite element study , 2013, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[6]  M. Swiontkowski,et al.  Implant-related complications in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures: meta-analysis of dynamic screw-plate versus dynamic screw-intramedullary nail devices , 2003, International Orthopaedics.

[7]  K. An,et al.  The number of screws, bone quality, and friction coefficient affect acetabular cup stability. , 2007, Medical engineering & physics.

[8]  L. Badras,et al.  The external fixator compared with the sliding hip screw for pertrochanteric fractures of the femur. , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[9]  M. Baumgaertner.  The pertrochanteric external fixator reduced pain, hospital stay, and mechanical complications in comparison with the sliding hip screw. , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  S. Giannini,et al.  Dynamic hip screw compared with external fixation for treatment of osteoporotic pertrochanteric fractures. A prospective, randomized study. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  P. Augat,et al.  A Biomechanical Evaluation of Orthopaedic Implants for Hip Fractures by Finite Element Analysis and In-Vitro Tests , 2010, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[12]  A. Patel,et al.  Fixation of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. A randomised prospective comparison of the gamma nail and the dynamic hip screw. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[13]  B. Mahaisavariya,et al.  Finite element study of the proximal femur with retained trochanteric gamma nail and after removal of nail. , 2006, Injury.

[14]  Ioannis P. Kostas-Agnantis,et al.  Proximal screws placement in intertrochanteric fractures treated with external fixation: comparison of two different techniques , 2011, Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research.

[15]  L. Badras,et al.  Management of pertrochanteric fractures in high-risk patients with an external fixation , 2001, International Orthopaedics.

[16]  S. Vowler,et al.  Prediction of fixation failure after sliding hip screw fixation. , 2004, Injury.

[17]  V. Patel,et al.  Comparison of a sliding hip screw with a trochanteric lateral support plate to an intramedullary hip screw for fixation of unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures: a cadaver study. , 2004, The Journal of trauma.

[18]  W. Hayes,et al.  Biomechanics of Fractures , 2009 .