The effect of protein-protein and protein-membrane interactions on membrane fouling in ultrafiltration

It was studied how protein-protein and protein-membrane interactions influence the filtration performance during the ultrafiltration of protein solutions over polymeric membranes. This was done by measuring flux, streaming potential, and protein transmission during filtration of bovine serum albumin (BSA) solutions at various pH values using various membranes with different cut-off values. It was found that protein-membrane interactions influence the fouling behaviour in the initial stages of filtration. In the high-fouling regime (later stages of filtration), protein-protein interactions dictate the overall performance. AFM images of the membrane surfaces taken after the filtration experiments showed that the membranes were totally covered by a protein fouling layer. The structure of this fouling layer depended strongly on pH. In particular, very open structures with high permeabilities were found at low pH (below the iso-electric point of the protein). These induced high values of flux and protein transmission. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. It was studied how protein-protein and protein-membrane interactions influence the filtration performance during the ultrafiltration of protein solutions over polymeric membranes. This was done by measuring flux, streaming potential, and protein transmission during filtration of bovine serum albumin (BSA) solutions at various pH values using various membranes with different cut-off values. It was found that protein-membrane interactions influence the fouling behaviour in the initial stages of filtration. In the high-fouling regime (later stages of filtration), protein-protein interactions dictate the overall performance. AFM images of the membrane surfaces taken after the filtration experiments showed that the membranes were totally covered by a protein fouling layer. The structure of this fouling layer depended strongly on pH. In particular, very open structures with high permeabilities were found at low pH (below the iso-electric point of the protein). These induced high values of flux and protein transmission.

[1]  Andrew L. Zydney,et al.  Mechanisms for BSA fouling during microfiltration , 1995 .

[2]  Gun Trägårdh,et al.  Particle transport in crossflow microfiltration – II. Effects of particle–particle interactions , 1999 .

[3]  Anthony G. Fane,et al.  Quantitative microscopic study of surface characteristics of ultrafiltration membranes , 1990 .

[4]  L. Ricq,et al.  Streaming potential and protein transmission ultrafiltration of single proteins and proteins in mixture: β-lactoglobulin and lysozyme , 1999 .

[5]  Hernández,et al.  Flux Decline in Protein Microfiltration: Influence of Operative Parameters , 1997, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[6]  H. Bauser,et al.  Concentration polarisation and adsorption effects in cross-flow ultrafiltration of proteins , 1990 .

[7]  P. Prádanos,et al.  Electrokinetic characterisation of ultrafiltration membranes by streaming potential, electroviscous effect, and salt retention , 2000 .

[8]  A. Pihlajamäki,et al.  Characterization of ultrafiltration membranes by simultaneous streaming potential and flux measurements , 1994 .

[9]  P. Prádanos,et al.  Fouling, structure and charges of a composite inorganic microfiltration membrane. , 1998 .

[10]  R. Field,et al.  Transmission of bovine albumin under controlled flux ultrafiltration , 1999 .

[11]  J. Pellegrino,et al.  Determination of osmotic pressure and fouling resistance and their effects of performance of ultrafiltration membranes , 1992 .

[12]  G. Belfort,et al.  Molecular interactions between proteins and synthetic membrane polymer films , 1995 .

[13]  Anthony G. Fane,et al.  The effect of ph and ionic environment on the ultrafiltration of protein solutions with retentive membranes , 1983 .

[14]  Sean P. Palecek,et al.  Intermolecular Electrostatic Interactions and Their Effect on Flux and Protein Deposition during Protein Filtration , 1994, Biotechnology progress.

[15]  E. Matthiasson.  The role of macromolecular adsorption in fouling of ultrafiltration membranes , 1983 .

[16]  A. Fane,et al.  Ultrafiltration of protein solutions through partially permeable membranes — the effect of adsorption and solution environment , 1983 .

[17]  Andrew L. Zydney,et al.  High-performance tangential flow filtration using charged membranes , 1999 .

[18]  Kenneth M. Persson,et al.  Contact angles of ultrafiltration membranes and their possible correlation to membrane performance , 1992 .

[19]  G. Belfort,et al.  Do Denatured Proteins Behave Like Polymers , 1994 .

[20]  P. Prádanos,et al.  Contact angles and external protein adsorption onto UF membranes , 1999 .

[21]  G. Belfort,et al.  Intermolecular forces between proteins and polymer films with relevance to filtration , 1997 .