An index based on silvicultural knowledge for tree stability assessment and improved ecological function in urban ecosystems

Trees in the city not only have an ornamental function but also a role in improving the ecological function in urban ecosystems that has been substantially disturbed by human activities such as environmental pollution. Today the ecological role of urban greenery is clearer than ever and is included in the new scientific field of ecological engineering, which is the design of sustainable ecosystems that integrate human society with its natural environment for the benefit of both. Trees in an urban environment show many difficulties in surviving in it because the ecological conditions that exist in the cities are worse than these of the nature. One of these seems to be the heavy wind loads. But even though rough surfaces slow down the wind speed, tall buildings can cause wind tunnel effects that stress a tree as much or even more than if it was positioned in an exposed, unprotected site. An urban tree must be able to endure all the damages and loads from the wind throughout its life. The ability of a tree to withstand wind loads of gale forces depends on its shape and its dimensions. The objective of this paper is the evaluation of tree stability based on the aboveground silvicultural characteristics in order to create an empirical index which can correlate tree stability with these features. Silvicultural characteristics that play the greatest role on tree stability are crown ratio (CR), crown asymmetry index (CAI), and tree height (H). Consequently, tree stability index (TSI) is formed by them. According to TSI values, tree stability was classified in three categories (classes): high, moderate and crucial stability. The limits of the transition from one class to another, as the classes themselves are depended on the number of variables that represent silvicultural characteristics.

[1]  S. Mitchell,et al.  Windthrow handbook for British Columbia forests. Research program working paper No. 9401 , 1994 .

[2]  F. Gómez,et al.  Vegetation and climatic changes in a city , 1998 .

[3]  William J. Mitsch,et al.  Ecological engineering—the 7-year itch , 1998 .

[4]  J. Gibbs,et al.  SURVEY OF PARKLAND TREES AFTER THE GREAT STORM OF OCTOBER 16, 1987 , 1990 .

[5]  Scott Cullen,et al.  Trees and Wind: Wind Scales and Speeds , 2002, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[6]  Brian Kane,et al.  Tree failure following a windstorm in Brewster, Massachusetts, USA , 2008 .

[7]  B. Gardiner,et al.  Wind and Trees: The interactions of wind and tree movement in forest canopies , 1995 .

[8]  A. Rosemond,et al.  Engineering role models: do non-human species have the answers? , 2003 .

[9]  Jianguo Wu,et al.  Ecology, planning, and management of urban forests: international perspectives. , 2008 .

[10]  G. R. Johnson,et al.  Urban Tree Risk Management:A Community Guide to Program Design and Implementation , 2003 .

[11]  Reginald Storms,et al.  Wind environmental conditions in passages between buildings , 1986 .

[12]  Ing.,et al.  THE EFFECT OF WIND ON TREES , 1936 .

[13]  John L. Monteith,et al.  Plant Response to Wind. , 1979 .

[14]  Douglas A. Maguire,et al.  Natural sway frequencies and damping ratios of trees: influence of crown structure , 2005, Trees.

[15]  J. Grace,et al.  Wind and Trees: Tree physiological responses , 1995 .

[16]  John R. Moore.  Differences in maximum resistive bending moments of Pinus radiata trees grown on a range of soil types. , 2000 .

[17]  R. Littell,et al.  Hurricanes and the Urban Forest: I. Effects on Southeastern United States Coastal Plain Tree Species , 2007 .

[18]  David R. Foster,et al.  Disturbance history, community organization and vegetation dynamics of the old-growth pisgah forest, South-Western New Hampshire, U.S.A , 1988 .

[19]  H. Peltola,et al.  Mechanical stability of Scots pine, Norway spruce and birch: an analysis of tree-pulling experiments in Finland , 2000 .

[20]  Peter Sterken,et al.  A Guide For Tree-Stability Analysis , 2005 .

[21]  J. Petty,et al.  Stability of Coniferous Tree Stems in Relation to Damage by Snow , 1981 .

[22]  Douglas A. Maguire,et al.  Natural sway frequencies and damping ratios of trees: concepts, review and synthesis of previous studies , 2004, Trees.

[23]  James L. Fridley,et al.  Design principles for ecological engineering , 2001 .

[24]  J. A. Petty,et al.  Factors influencing stem breakage of conifers in high winds , 1985 .

[25]  T. Tsitsoni,et al.  Research on urban greenery of representative types in the avenues of a big city , 2007 .

[26]  Steven C. McCutcheon,et al.  The emergence of ecological engineering as a discipline , 2003 .

[27]  Barry Gardiner,et al.  A mathematical model to describe the dynamic response of a spruce tree to the wind , 1998, Trees.

[28]  L. Bondesson,et al.  Assessing the Risk of Snow and Wind Damage from Tree Physical Characteristics , 1993 .

[29]  N. Haritos,et al.  Mechanical stability of trees under dynamic loads. , 2006, American journal of botany.

[30]  Brian Kane,et al.  The Effects Of Pruning Type On Wind Loading Of Acer Rubrum , 2006, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[31]  A. Miyawaki.  Restoration of urban green environments based on the theories of vegetation ecology 1 Paper presente , 1998 .