Impacts of human and spatial factors on user satisfaction in office environments

Abstract Post Occupancy Evaluation (POE), as an architectural design decision tool, utilizes data concerning multiple users' satisfaction in conjunction with indoor environmental components to develop a better quality of human life. However, one of the limitations of POE that is frequently pointed out is its excessive reliance on surveys and general solutions, without a full understanding of the occupants' physiological characteristics and pertinent environmental performance/conditions. This lack of awareness may lead to irrelevant modifications and the occupants' dissatisfaction with indoor environmental quality (IEQ). Therefore, this study suggested an integrated POE, that combined a quantifiable environmental dataset to indicate each individual occupant's satisfaction with each IEQ element. At 411 workstations in modern offices located in Southern California of the U.S., on-site IEQ measurements and user satisfaction surveys were conducted. Statistical analyses of the collected data were also conducted within specific categories of building types, spatial attributes, and human factors. These analyses revealed significant relationships that exist between human factors and IEQ satisfaction, as well as environmental conditions, including gender, age, workstation location, etc. These relationships could be ranked in accordance with the impact that sensitivities of individual IEQ elements using a decision tree algorithm, have on human physiological conditions. These findings suggested a hierarchical approach as an optimal design solution to maximize the occupants' well-being in their workplace environments. Therefore, these results reinforced the necessity for an integrated POE with consideration of human and environmental factors in order to provide enhanced/optimal IEQ design solutions for specifically-targeted population and spatial conditions.

[1]  Jihyun Park,et al.  Are Humans Good Sensors? Using Occupants as Sensors for Indoor Environmental Quality Assessment and for Developing Thresholds that Matter , 2015 .

[2]  Isaac A. Meir,et al.  Post-Occupancy Evaluation: An Inevitable Step Toward Sustainability , 2009 .

[3]  Lusi Morhayim,et al.  Survey of an office and laboratory university building - An unhealthy building case study , 2008 .

[4]  John G. Bartzis,et al.  Perceived Indoor Environment and Occupants’ Comfort in European “Modern” Office Buildings: The OFFICAIR Study , 2016, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[5]  Vivian Loftness,et al.  The value of post-occupancy evaluation for building occupants and facility managers , 2009 .

[6]  Leah Zagreus,et al.  Occupant satisfaction with indoor environmental quality in green buildings , 2006 .

[7]  William J. Fisk,et al.  Ventilation rates and health , 2002 .

[8]  H. D. Einhom.  Unified glare rating (UGR): Merits and application to multiple sources , 1998 .

[9]  Richard de Dear,et al.  Nonlinear relationships between individual IEQ factors and overall workspace satisfaction , 2012 .

[10]  Chris Watson,et al.  Review of Building Quality Using Post Occupancy Evaluation , 2003 .

[11]  Chi-ming Lai,et al.  A methodology to assess the indoor environment in care centers for senior citizens , 2001 .

[12]  Han-Hsi Liang,et al.  Satisfaction of occupants toward indoor environment quality of certified green office buildings in Taiwan , 2014 .

[13]  Standard Ashrae.  Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy , 1992 .

[14]  N. Kano,et al.  Attractive Quality and Must-Be Quality , 1984 .

[15]  Edward Arens,et al.  Gender differences in office occupant perception of indoor environmental quality (IEQ) , 2013 .

[16]  M Frontczak,et al.  Quantitative relationships between occupant satisfaction and satisfaction aspects of indoor environmental quality and building design. , 2012, Indoor air.

[17]  William J. Fisk,et al.  How IEQ affects health, productivity , 2002 .

[18]  Jeffrey A. Lackney,et al.  Post-Occupancy Evaluation of Public Libraries: Lessons Learned from Three Case Studies , 2005 .

[19]  Joon-Ho Choi,et al.  Post-occupancy evaluation of 20 office buildings as basis for future IEQ standards and guidelines , 2012 .

[20]  Risto Kosonen,et al.  Perceived IEQ Conditions: Why the Actual Percentage of Dissatisfied Persons is Higher than Standards Indicate? , 2011 .

[21]  Andreas Wagner,et al.  Thermal comfort and workplace occupant satisfaction—Results of field studies in German low energy office buildings , 2007 .

[22]  Wolfgang F. E. Preiser,et al.  Post‐occupancy evaluation: how to make buildings work better , 1995 .

[23]  Ahsen Özsoy,et al.  Spatial adaptability and flexibility as parameters of user satisfaction for quality housing , 1998 .

[24]  Seymour Geisser,et al.  8. Predictive Inference: An Introduction , 1995 .

[25]  Vivian Loftness,et al.  Investigation on the impacts of different genders and ages on satisfaction with thermal environments in office buildings , 2010 .

[26]  Adrian Leaman,et al.  Assessing building performance in use 1: the Probe process , 2001 .