Genomic imputation and evaluation using high-density Holstein genotypes.

Genomic evaluations for 161,341 Holsteins were computed by using 311,725 of 777,962 markers on the Illumina BovineHD Genotyping BeadChip (HD). Initial edits with 1,741 HD genotypes from 5 breeds revealed that 636,967 markers were usable but that half were redundant. Holstein genotypes were from 1,510 animals with HD markers, 82,358 animals with 45,187 (50K) markers, 1,797 animals with 8,031 (8K) markers, 20,177 animals with 6,836 (6K) markers, 52,270 animals with 2,683 (3K) markers, and 3,229 nongenotyped dams (0K) with >90% of haplotypes imputable because they had 4 or more genotyped progeny. The Holstein HD genotypes were from 1,142 US, Canadian, British, and Italian sires, 196 other sires, 138 cows in a US Department of Agriculture research herd (Beltsville, MD), and 34 other females. Percentages of correctly imputed genotypes were tested by applying the programs findhap and FImpute to a simulated chromosome for an earlier population that had only 1,112 animals with HD genotypes and none with 8K genotypes. For each chip, 1% of the genotypes were missing and 0.02% were incorrect initially. After imputation of missing markers with findhap, percentages of genotypes correct were 99.9% from HD, 99.0% from 50K, 94.6% from 6K, 90.5% from 3K, and 93.5% from 0K. With FImpute, 99.96% were correct from HD, 99.3% from 50K, 94.7% from 6K, 91.1% from 3K, and 95.1% from 0K genotypes. Accuracy for the 3K and 6K genotypes further improved by approximately 2 percentage points if imputed first to 50K and then to HD instead of imputing all genotypes directly to HD. Evaluations were tested by using imputed actual genotypes and August 2008 phenotypes to predict deregressed evaluations of US bulls proven after August 2008. For 28 traits tested, the estimated genomic reliability averaged 61.1% when using 311,725 markers vs. 60.7% when using 45,187 markers vs. 29.6% from the traditional parent average. Squared correlations with future data were slightly greater for 16 traits and slightly less for 12 with HD than with 50K evaluations. The observed 0.4 percentage point average increase in reliability was less favorable than the 0.9 expected from simulation but was similar to actual gains from other HD studies. The largest HD and 50K marker effects were often located at very similar positions. The single-breed evaluation tested here and previous single-breed or multibreed evaluations have not produced large gains. Increasing the number of HD genotypes used for imputation above 1,074 did not improve the reliability of Holstein genomic evaluations.

[1]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[2]  P. Ma,et al.  Comparison of genomic predictions using medium-density (∼54,000) and high-density (∼777,000) single nucleotide polymorphism marker panels in Nordic Holstein and Red Dairy Cattle populations. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[3]  B. Harris,et al.  The Impact of High Density SNP chips on Genomic Evaluation in Dairy Cattle , 2010 .

[4]  M Erbe,et al.  Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[5]  Tad S. Sonstegard,et al.  Design of a Bovine Low-Density SNP Array Optimized for Imputation , 2012, PloS one.

[6]  David Reich,et al.  Phasing of many thousands of genotyped samples. , 2012, American journal of human genetics.

[7]  M. Goddard,et al.  Accurate Prediction of Genetic Values for Complex Traits by Whole-Genome Resequencing , 2010, Genetics.

[8]  T. Meuwissen,et al.  Genomic predictions for production - and Functional Traits in Norwegian Red from BLUP analyses of imputed 54K and 777K SNP data , 2011 .

[9]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Use of the Illumina Bovine3K BeadChip in dairy genomic evaluation. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[10]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Distribution and location of genetic effects for dairy traits. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[11]  G. Kistemaker,et al.  Comparison of different imputation methods , 2011 .

[12]  Alison L. Van Eenennaam,et al.  Hot topic: performance of bovine high-density genotyping platforms in Holsteins and Jerseys. , 2011, Journal of dairy science.

[13]  J. Hickey,et al.  Different models of genetic variation and their effect on genomic evaluation , 2011, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[14]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Genomic evaluations with many more genotypes , 2011, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[15]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Invited review: reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[16]  B. Harris,et al.  Experiences with the Illumina high density bovine BeadChip , 2011 .