Fracture toughness characterization of nanoreinforced carbon-fiber composite materials for damage mitigation

Continuous polyacrylonitrile (PAN) nanofibers fabricated via the electrospinning process and commercially available silica nanoparticles were investigated and compared for their impact mitigating effects when incorporated into composite materials. The nanofibers were introduced at ply interfaces using two different approaches while the nanoparticles were mixed into the matrix material. Behavior was experimentally characterized by determining the fracture toughness of flat carbon-fiber composite coupons using the double cantilever beam (DCB) test according to ASTM D5528. The nanofibers were introduced to the composite coupons by directly electrospinning the fibers onto the ply surfaces or transferring the fibers from an interim substrate, or "nanomat", while the nanosilica particles were mixed into the resin system during vacuum bagging hand layup. Testing facilitated the calculation of Mode I strain energy release rates. Preliminary results show that when compared to a baseline coupon without nanoreinforcement, there is a 54.5%, 43.1%, and 26.9% reduction in Gavg for the nanomat, nanosilica, and directly deposited nanomaterial coupons, respectively. Directly deposited nanofibers outperformed the nanosilica reinforcement by 16.2% and the nanomat approach by 27.6%. Basic materials (carbon-fiber ply material and matrix system) and incomplete composite consolidation were cited as contributors to poor test coupon quality and detrimental to Mode I performance.

[1]  Kent L. Lawrence,et al.  Design analysis of composite angle clips , 1990 .

[2]  Nicholas J. Pagano,et al.  Interlaminar response of composite materials , 1989 .

[3]  Charles E. Bakis,et al.  Damage Tolerance of Layer-Wise Hybrid Laminates Consisting of Glass Reinforced Flexible and Rigid Epoxy Resins , 2008 .

[4]  G. Zhou,et al.  Investigation on the Reduction of In-Plane Compressive Strength in Thick Preconditioned Composite Panels , 2006 .

[5]  Brian L. Wardle,et al.  Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of a Woven Advanced Composite Reinforced with Aligned Carbon Nanotubes , 2009 .

[6]  Satoshi Kobayashi,et al.  Evaluation of burst strength of FW-FRP composite pipes after impact using pitch-based low-modulus carbon fiber , 2006 .

[7]  E. S. Reddy,et al.  A Criterion for Mixed-Mode Matrix Cracking in Graphite-Epoxy Composites , 1990 .

[8]  Charles E. Bakis,et al.  Matrix toughness, long-term behavior, and damage tolerance of notched graphite fiber-reinforced composite materials , 1990 .

[9]  James C. Seferis,et al.  Interlayer toughened unidirectional carbon prepreg systems: effect of preformed particle morphology , 2003 .

[10]  John Morton,et al.  Post-impact fatigue performance of carbon fibre laminates with non-woven and mixed-woven layers , 1983 .

[11]  Hiroshi Noguchi,et al.  Residual Compressive Failure Characteristics of Hybrid Composites with Nonwoven Carbon Tissue after Indentation Damage , 2004 .

[12]  G. Zhou,et al.  Effect of impact damage on residual compressive strength of glass-fibre reinforced polyester (GFRP) laminates , 1996 .

[13]  Erian A. Armanios,et al.  Understanding and Predicting Sublaminate Damage Mechanisms in Composite Structures , 1990 .

[14]  Jang-Kyo Kim,et al.  Impact and delamination failure of woven-fabric composites , 2000 .

[15]  Lawrence W. Rehfield,et al.  A theory for stress analysis of composite laminates , 1985 .

[16]  Dahsin Liu,et al.  Delamination Resistance in Stitched and Unstitched Composite Plates Subjected to Impact Loading , 1990 .

[17]  S. J. Harris,et al.  Strategic reinforcement of hybrid carbon fibre-reinforced polymer composites , 1977 .

[18]  Yongkui Wen,et al.  Continuous Carbon Nanofibers For Nanofiber Composites , 2001 .

[19]  Levon Minnetyan,et al.  Progressive fracture of polymer matrix composite structures: A new approach , 1992 .

[20]  Y. Dzenis,et al.  Spinning Continuous Fibers for Nanotechnology , 2004, Science.

[21]  Jang-Kyo Kim,et al.  Drop-weight impact damage tolerance of CFRP with rubber-modified epoxy matrix , 1993 .

[22]  Anthony J. Kinloch,et al.  The effect of silica nano particles and rubber particles on the toughness of multiphase thermosetting epoxy polymers , 2005 .

[23]  Nicole E. Zander Epoxy Nano-Reinforced Composite Systems , 2008 .

[24]  John A. Nairn,et al.  Microcracking, microcrack-induced delamination, and longitudinal splitting of advanced composite structures , 1992 .

[25]  Anthony J. Kinloch,et al.  Toughening mechanisms of nanoparticle-modified epoxy polymers , 2007 .

[26]  Thomas K. Tsotsis,et al.  Interlayer toughening of composite materials , 2009 .

[27]  L. C. Russell,et al.  Polymer Nanofabric Interleaved Composite Laminates , 2009 .

[28]  Joseph H. Koo,et al.  Nanocomposites for Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites , 2005 .

[29]  John E. Masters,et al.  Improved Impact and Delamination Resistance through Interleafing , 1991 .

[30]  Mf Hibbs,et al.  Correlations Between Micromechanical Failure Processes and the Delamination Toughness of Graphite/Epoxy Systems , 1987 .

[31]  Lawrence W. Rehfield,et al.  A new ply model for interlaminar stress analysis , 1985 .

[32]  Alkiviadis S. Paipetis,et al.  Impact and after-impact properties of carbon fibre reinforced composites enhanced with multi-wall carbon nanotubes , 2010 .

[33]  X.-S. Yi,et al.  Effect of interleaf sequence on impact damage and residual strength in a graphite/epoxy laminate , 2004 .

[34]  Yi Li,et al.  Dynamic mechanical analysis of nano-SiO2 /bismaleimide composite , 2008, 2008 3rd IEEE International Conference on Nano/Micro Engineered and Molecular Systems.

[35]  Chad T. Peterson,et al.  Hybrid Nanomanufacturing Process for High-Rate Polymer Nanofiber Production , 2010 .

[36]  Daniel DeSchepper,et al.  Nanosilica Modification of Elastomer-Modified VARTM Epoxy Resins for Improved Resin and Composite Toughness , 2007 .

[37]  Carl T. Herakovich,et al.  On the Relationship between Engineering Properties and Delamination of Composite Materials , 1981 .