Optimal Filter Design for Multiple Sclerosis Lesions Segmentation from Regions of Interest in Brain MRI

In this paper, we propose an optimal filter design strategy for the purpose of detecting and segmenting MS lesions in prescribed regions of interest within brain MRI data. Reliable segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions in magnetic resonance brain imaging is important for at least three types of practical applications: pharmaceutical trials, decision making for drug treatment or surgery, and patient follow-up. Manual segmentation of the MS lesions in brain MRI by well qualified experts is usually preferred. However, manual segmentation is hard to reproduce and can be time consuming in the presence of large volumes of MRI data. On the other hand, automated segmentation methods are significantly faster and yield reproducible results. However, these methods generally produce segmentation results that agree only partially with the ground truth segmentation provided by the expert. In this work, we propose a semi-automated MS lesion detection system that combines the knowledge of the expert with the computational capacity to produce faster and more reliable MS segmentation results. In particular, the user selects coarse regions of interest (ROI's) that enclose potential MS lesions and a sufficient background of healthy white matter tissues. Having this two-class classification problem, we propose a feature extraction method based on optimal filter design that aim for producing output texture features corresponding to the MS lesions and healthy tissues background which are maximally separable. If this is achieved, the two output features may be easily separated using simple thresholding operations. The method is applied on real MRI data and the results are qualitatively compared to a ground truth, which is manually segmented by a human expert

[1]  Kenneth I. Laws,et al.  Rapid Texture Identification , 1980, Optics & Photonics.

[2]  Trygve Randen,et al.  Texture segmentation using filters with optimized energy separation , 1999, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[3]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[4]  J Chambron,et al.  Distinct patterns of active and non-active plaques using texture analysis on brain NMR images in multiple sclerosis patients: preliminary results. , 1999, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[5]  Supun Samarasekera,et al.  Multiple sclerosis lesion quantification using fuzzy-connectedness principles , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  W. L. Benedict,et al.  Multiple Sclerosis , 2007, Journal - Michigan State Medical Society.

[7]  Koenraad Van Leemput,et al.  Automated segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions by model outlier detection , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  R I Grossman,et al.  Perspectives on multiple sclerosis. , 1998, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[9]  D. Paty,et al.  Interferon beta‐1b is effective in relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis , 1993, Neurology.

[10]  R Kikinis,et al.  Automatic identification of gray matter structures from MRI to improve the segmentation of white matter lesions. , 1995, Journal of image guided surgery.

[11]  P. Tofts,et al.  Texture analysis of spinal cord pathology in multiple sclerosis , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  Trygve Randen,et al.  Filtering for Texture Classification: A Comparative Study , 1999, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[13]  D. Silberberg,et al.  New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines for research protocols , 1983, Annals of neurology.

[14]  H Azhari,et al.  Automated detection and characterization of multiple sclerosis lesions in brain MR images. , 1998, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[15]  R. Lechtenberg Multiple Sclerosis Fact Book , 1996 .