Statistical database analysis of the role of loop dynamics for protein‐protein complex formation and allostery

Motivation: Protein loops show rich conformational dynamics properties on a wide range of timescales as they play an essential role for many cellular functions during protein‐protein interactions and recognition processes. However, little is known about the detail behavior of loops upon protein binding including allostery. Results: We report the loop motions and their dominant timescales for a library of 230 proteins that form protein‐protein complexes using the ToeLoop predictor of loop dynamics. We applied the analysis to proteins in both their complex and free state and relate specific loop properties to their role in protein recognition. We observe a strong tendency of loops that move on relatively slow timescales of tens of ns to sub‐&mgr;s to be directly involved in binding and recognition processes. Complex formation leads to a significant reduction in loop flexibility at the binding interface, but in a number of cases it can also trigger increased flexibility in distal loops in response to allosteric conformational changes. The importance of loop dynamics and allostery is highlighted by a case study of an antibody‐antigen complex. Furthermore, we explored the relationship between loop dynamics and experimental binding affinities and found that a prevalence of high loop rigidity at the binding interface is an indicator of increased binding strength. Availability and Implementation: http://spin.ccic.ohio‐state.edu/index.php/toeloopppi Contact: bruschweiler.1@osu.edu Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

[1]  E. Querol,et al.  Identification of function-associated loop motifs and application to protein function prediction , 2006, Bioinform..

[2]  Joshua A. Kritzer,et al.  Comprehensive Analysis of Loops at Protein-Protein Interfaces for Macrocycle Design , 2014, Nature chemical biology.

[3]  Baldomero Oliva,et al.  ArchDB 2014: structural classification of loops in proteins , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[4]  R. Nussinov,et al.  The Role of Protein Loops and Linkers in Conformational Dynamics and Allostery. , 2016, Chemical reviews.

[5]  Rafael Najmanovich,et al.  Side-chain rotamer changes upon ligand binding: common, crucial, correlate with entropy and rearrange hydrogen bonding , 2012, Bioinform..

[6]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Antibody Multispecificity Mediated by Conformational Diversity , 2003, Science.

[7]  Raphael A. G. Chaleil,et al.  Updates to the Integrated Protein-Protein Interaction Benchmarks: Docking Benchmark Version 5 and Affinity Benchmark Version 2. , 2015, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  Ioannis Xenarios,et al.  DIP, the Database of Interacting Proteins: a research tool for studying cellular networks of protein interactions , 2002, Nucleic Acids Res..

[9]  L. Gold,et al.  Let's get specific: the relationship between specificity and affinity. , 1995, Chemistry & biology.

[10]  M. Grütter,et al.  The crystal structure of TGF‐β3 and comparison to TGF‐β2: Implications for receptor binding , 1996, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[11]  G. Melacini,et al.  Advances in NMR Methods To Map Allosteric Sites: From Models to Translation. , 2016, Chemical reviews.

[12]  Tom L. Blundell,et al.  Flexibility and small pockets at protein–protein interfaces: New insights into druggability , 2015, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[13]  Y. Zhang,et al.  IntAct—open source resource for molecular interaction data , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[14]  Joshua A. Kritzer,et al.  Analysis of Loops that Mediate Protein-Protein Interactions and Translation into Submicromolar Inhibitors. , 2016, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[15]  M. Grütter,et al.  A cytokine-neutralizing antibody as a structural mimetic of 2 receptor interactions , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Rafael Brüschweiler,et al.  Decoding the Mobility and Time Scales of Protein Loops. , 2015, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[17]  Gabriele Ausiello,et al.  MINT: the Molecular INTeraction database , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..