A fuzzy logic based algorithm for defining and extracting pore network structure from tomography images of rocks

Abstract X-ray tomography has opened a window into the invisible world of pore structure in rocks. Using tomography images as input, pore network models try to use a simple geometric representation to acquire a detailed description of the pore volume. Algorithms developed so far to extract the pore network from tomography images are primarily focused on calculating petrophysical properties of the rock sample. The present study is concerned with extracting a pore network that enables us to elicit information about structural properties and features of the rock sample. However, there is no quantifiable definition of what a pore is and deciding how to divide the pore volume into discrete pores is vague and arbitrary. Fuzzy logic is an extension of classical logic that can accommodate situations where the nature of problem itself is vague. We have developed an algorithm to extract the pore structure and quantify the pore properties from tomography images of rocks. In the algorithm a fuzzy logic based inference engine is used to assess the quality of pores extracted by watershed segmentation and modify them if needed. We have also designed a fingerprinting plot based on the information content of the network, to quantify performance of the algorithm. Results show that the algorithm is able to link the overall structure of the porous space to the final network and produce reliable results for rocks with a variety of pore structures.

[1]  L. Sander,et al.  Diffusion-limited aggregation, a kinetic critical phenomenon , 1981 .

[2]  Pejman Tahmasebi,et al.  Stochastic shale permeability matching: Three-dimensional characterization and modeling , 2016 .

[3]  Derek R. Wilson,et al.  Matching region adjacency graphs , 1991 .

[4]  John F. Canny,et al.  A Computational Approach to Edge Detection , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[5]  H. Suhonen,et al.  Resolution dependence of petrophysical parameters derived from X-ray tomography of chalk , 2014 .

[6]  B. Kosko Fuzziness vs. probability , 1990 .

[7]  Arash Rabbani,et al.  An automated simple algorithm for realistic pore network extraction from micro-tomography images , 2014 .

[8]  Feifei Yang,et al.  Extraction of pore-morphology and capillary pressure curves of porous media from synchrotron-based tomography data , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[9]  M. Blunt,et al.  Pore-scale imaging and modelling , 2013 .

[10]  Jeff Gelb,et al.  Multi-scale method of Nano(Micro)-CT study on microscopic pore structure of tight sandstone of Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin , 2013 .

[11]  David J. C. MacKay,et al.  Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[12]  Xiaoli Yang,et al.  Watershed segmentation for binary images with different distance transforms , 2004, Proceedings. Second International Conference on Creating, Connecting and Collaborating through Computing.

[13]  Siegfried Gottwald An early approach toward graded identity and graded membership in set theory , 2010, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[14]  Ioannis Chatzis,et al.  Permeability and electrical conductivity of porous media from 3D stochastic replicas of the microstructure , 2000 .

[15]  Rieke,et al.  Chapter 5 Performance and classification of carbonate reservoirs , 1996 .

[16]  A. Hunt,et al.  Porous Media Primer for Physicists , 2014 .

[17]  Jianqiang Wang,et al.  Characterization of typical 3D pore networks of Jiulaodong formation shale using nano-transmission X-ray microscopy , 2016 .

[18]  Veerle Cnudde,et al.  High-resolution X-ray computed tomography in geosciences: A review of the current technology and applications , 2013 .

[19]  A. Safekordi,et al.  A multiple-point statistics algorithm for 3D pore space reconstruction from 2D images , 2011 .

[20]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  Sequential Operations in Digital Picture Processing , 1966, JACM.

[21]  Ebrahim H. Mamdani,et al.  An Experiment in Linguistic Synthesis with a Fuzzy Logic Controller , 1999, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[22]  Henning Osholm Sørensen,et al.  Improved segmentation of X-ray tomography data from porous rocks using a dual filtering approach , 2012, Comput. Geosci..

[23]  J. Muller,et al.  Mean field calculation of effective permeability based on fractal pore space , 1992 .

[24]  Martin J Blunt,et al.  Pore-network extraction from micro-computerized-tomography images. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[25]  Jos B. T. M. Roerdink,et al.  The Watershed Transform: Definitions, Algorithms and Parallelization Strategies , 2000, Fundam. Informaticae.

[26]  C. L. Lin,et al.  Improved 3D image segmentation for X-ray tomographic analysis of packed particle beds , 2015 .

[27]  B. K. Mishra,et al.  Measurement of pore size distributions from capillary pressure curves , 1988 .

[28]  C. Tsakiroglou,et al.  Pore-Wall Roughness as a Fractal Surface and Theoretical Simulation of Mercury Intrusion/Retraction in Porous Media , 1993 .

[29]  Stig Bakke,et al.  Reconstruction of Berea sandstone and pore-scale modelling of wettability effects , 2003 .

[30]  Amir Raoof,et al.  A New Method for Generating Pore-Network Models of Porous Media , 2010 .

[31]  Riyaz Kharrat,et al.  Estimation of 3-D pore network coordination number of rocks from watershed segmentation of a single 2-D image , 2016 .

[32]  David W. Paglieroni,et al.  Distance transforms: Properties and machine vision applications , 1992, CVGIP Graph. Model. Image Process..

[33]  Roland Zengerle,et al.  On the importance of FIB-SEM specific segmentation algorithms for porous media , 2014 .

[34]  H. Wadell,et al.  Volume, Shape, and Roundness of Quartz Particles , 1935, The Journal of Geology.

[35]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[36]  S. Bakke,et al.  3-D Pore-Scale Modelling of Sandstones and Flow Simulations in the Pore Networks , 1997 .

[37]  Ioannidis,et al.  On the Geometry and Topology of 3D Stochastic Porous Media. , 2000, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[38]  Pejman Tahmasebi,et al.  Conditional reconstruction: An alternative strategy in digital rock physics , 2016 .

[39]  Pejman Tahmasebi,et al.  Reconstruction of nonstationary disordered materials and media: Watershed transform and cross-correlation function. , 2015, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[40]  M. M. Mohan Kumar,et al.  Upscaling of nanoparticle transport in porous media under unfavorable conditions: Pore scale to Darcy scale. , 2017, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[41]  M. Blunt,et al.  Pore space reconstruction using multiple-point statistics , 2005 .

[42]  S. Stipp,et al.  Effect of tomography resolution on the calculated microscopic properties of porous materials: Comparison of sandstone and carbonate rocks , 2016 .

[43]  Calvin R. Maurer,et al.  A Linear Time Algorithm for Computing Exact Euclidean Distance Transforms of Binary Images in Arbitrary Dimensions , 2003, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[44]  Effects of pore size distribution and coordination number on the prediction of filtration coefficients for straining from percolation theory , 2015 .

[45]  Gregoire Mariethoz,et al.  Using bivariate multiple-point statistics and proximal soil sensor data to map fossil ice-wedge polygons , 2011 .

[46]  N. Otsu A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .

[47]  T. Patzek,et al.  Pore space morphology analysis using maximal inscribed spheres , 2006 .

[48]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..