Short Note Buildings as a Seismic Source: Analysis of a Release Test at Bagnoli, Italy

Taking advantage of a large displacement-release experiment on a two- story reinforced concrete building located in Bagnoli (Naples, Italy), we performed free-field measurements using 3D seismometers, accelerometers, and a 100-m-long vertical array. The ground motion was noticeable: near the building, the acceleration exceeded 5% g. At each measurement point, it was possible to recognize two source terms, due to the tested building and to the reaction structure. The two sources gen- erated different wave trains. High-frequency accelerations propagated as Rayleigh waves, whereas 1-2 Hz waves carrying most of the displacement propagated only as body waves. The experiment lends further support to the hypothesis that buildings are able to modify substantially the free-field ground motion in their proximity: the peak ground acceleration we observed is the 20% of the ground acceleration required to produce a displacement on the building equal to the one imposed during the release test. We recognize, however, the difficulty of a realistic modeling of wave propa- gation in the topmost layer of a densely urbanized area.

[1]  D. L. Anderson,et al.  Seismic excitation by the space shuttle Columbia , 1991, Nature.

[2]  Maria Rosaria Gallipoli,et al.  Structure, soil-structure response and effects of damage based on observations of horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratios of microtremors , 2004 .

[3]  Dennis Gabor,et al.  Theory of communication , 1946 .

[4]  Maria Rosaria Gallipoli,et al.  An Empirical Method to Assess the Seismic Vulnerability of Existing Buildings Using the HVSR Technique , 2001 .

[5]  Felice Carlo Ponzo,et al.  Seismic waves generated by oscillating buildings: analysis of a release test , 2003 .

[6]  P. Guéguen,et al.  Site-City Seismic Interaction in Mexico City–Like Environments: An Analytical Study , 2002 .

[7]  Donatello Cardone,et al.  Experimental static and dynamic response of a real r/c frame upgraded with SMA re-centering and dissipating braces , 2004 .

[8]  Gian Michele Calvi,et al.  A DISPLACEMENT-BASED APPROACH FOR VULNERABILITY EVALUATION OF CLASSES OF BUILDINGS , 1999 .

[9]  Pierre-Yves Bard,et al.  Experimental and Numerical Analysis of Soil Motions Caused by Free Vibrations of a Building Model , 2000 .

[10]  Francisco J. Chávez-García,et al.  The contribution of the built environment to the ‘free-field’ ground motion in Mexico City , 2002 .

[11]  Pierre-Yves Bard,et al.  Effects of buildings on the duration and amplitude of ground motion in Mexico City , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[12]  P. Guéguen,et al.  SOIL-STRUCTURE AND SOIL-STRUCTURE-SOIL INTERACTION: EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE AT THE VOLVI TEST SITE , 2005 .

[13]  Giovanna Cultrera,et al.  Effect of Local Geology on Ground Motion in the City of Palermo, Italy, as Inferred from Aftershocks of the 6 September 2002 Mw 5.9 Earthquake , 2005 .

[14]  Cécile Cornou,et al.  Ambient noise energy bursts observation and modeling: Trapping of harmonic structure-soil induced–waves in a topmost sedimentary layer , 2004 .

[15]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  Two-dimensional, antiplane, building-soil-building interaction for two or more buildings and for incident planet SH waves , 1975 .

[16]  M. R. Gallipolia,et al.  Structure , soil – structure response and effects of damage based on observations of horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratios of microtremors , 2004 .

[17]  P. C. Jennings.  Distant motions from a building vibration test , 1970, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.