Unmanned aerial vehicle acquisition of three-dimensional digital image correlation measurements for structural health monitoring of bridges

Civil engineering structures such as bridges, buildings, and tunnels continue to be used despite aging and deterioration well past their design life. In 2013, the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) rated the state of the U.S. bridges as mediocre, despite the $12.8 billion USD annually invested. Traditional inspection and monitoring techniques may produce inconsistent results, are labor intensive and too time-consuming to be considered effective for large-scale monitoring. Therefore, new structural health monitoring systems must be developed that are automated, highly accurate, minimally invasive, and cost effective. Three-dimensional (3D) digital image correlation (DIC) systems possess the capability of extracting full-field strain, displacement, and geometry profiles. Furthermore, as this measurement technique is implemented within an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) the capability to expedite the optical-based measurement process is increased as well as the infrastructure downtime being reduced. These resulting integrity maps of the structure of interest can be easily interpreted by trained personal. Within this paper, the feasibility of performing DIC measurements using a pair of cameras installed on a UAV is shown. Performance is validated with in-flight measurements. Also, full-field displacement monitoring, 3D measurement stitching, and 3D point-tracking techniques are employed in conjunction with 3D mapping and data management software. The results of these experiments show that the combination of autonomous flight with 3D DIC and other non-contact measurement systems provides a highly valuable and effective civil inspection platform.

[1]  C. Niezrecki,et al.  Monitoring the Dynamics of a Helicopter Main Rotor With High-Speed Stereophotogrammetry , 2016, Experimental Techniques.

[2]  Alessandro Sabato,et al.  Feasibility of digital image correlation for railroad tie inspection and ballast support assessment , 2017 .

[3]  Thomas W. Ryan,et al.  Bridge Inspector's Reference Manual: Volume 1 and Volume 2 , 2002 .

[4]  J. Théau,et al.  Recent applications of unmanned aerial imagery in natural resource management , 2014 .

[5]  Ivan Bartoli,et al.  Bridge related damage quantification using unmanned aerial vehicle imagery , 2016 .

[6]  Duzgun Agdas,et al.  Comparison of visual inspection and structural-health monitoring as bridge condition assessment methods , 2016 .

[7]  Peter Avitabile,et al.  Large-area photogrammetry based testing of wind turbine blades , 2017 .

[8]  Guido Morgenthal,et al.  Visual inspection strategies for large bridges using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) , 2014 .

[9]  Gonzalo Pajares,et al.  Overview and Current Status of Remote Sensing Applications Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) , 2015 .

[10]  Norman HALLERMANN,et al.  Unmanned Aerial Systems ( UAS ) – Case Studies of Vision Based Monitoring of Ageing Structures , 2015 .

[11]  Peter Avitabile,et al.  Photogrammetry and optical methods in structural dynamics – A review , 2017 .

[12]  Satish B Mohan,et al.  Status of Bridge Failures in the United States (1800-2009) , 2011 .

[13]  Lawrence L. Sutter,et al.  An Evaluation of Commercially Available Remote Sensors for Assessing Highway Bridge Condition , 2010 .

[14]  X. W. Ye,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring of Civil Infrastructure Using Optical Fiber Sensing Technology : A Comprehensive Review , 2015 .

[15]  Michael Forde,et al.  Application of infrared thermography to the non-destructive testing of concrete and masonry bridges , 2003 .

[16]  Benjamin A. Graybeal,et al.  RELIABILITY OF VISUAL INSPECTION FOR HIGHWAY BRIDGES, VOLUME I: FINAL REPORT , 2001 .

[17]  Fu-Kuo Chang,et al.  Ultrasonic guided wave active sensing for monitoring of split failures in reinforced concrete , 2015 .

[18]  Tzuyang Yu,et al.  Sizing and ranging criteria for SAR images of steel and wood specimens , 2016, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[19]  Hubert W. Schreier,et al.  Image Correlation for Shape, Motion and Deformation Measurements: Basic Concepts,Theory and Applications , 2009 .

[20]  Zhu Mao,et al.  Probabilistic uncertainty quantification of wavelet-transform-based structural health monitoring features , 2016, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[21]  Raja Sengupta,et al.  Vision-Based Monitoring of Locally Linear Structures Using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle , 2008 .

[22]  Oral Büyüköztürk Imaging of concrete structures , 1998 .

[23]  Zhu Mao,et al.  Statistical Modeling of Wavelet-Transform-Based Features in Structural Health Monitoring , 2016 .

[24]  Nathaniel J. C. Libatique,et al.  UAV aerial imaging applications for post-disaster assessment, environmental management and infrastructure development , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS).

[25]  Asce,et al.  2013 report card for America’s infrastructure , 2017 .

[26]  David A. Nix,et al.  Vibration–based structural damage identification , 2001, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[27]  Alessandro Sabato,et al.  Wireless MEMS-Based Accelerometer Sensor Boards for Structural Vibration Monitoring: A Review , 2017, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[28]  Peter Avitabile,et al.  Similitude Analysis of the Strain Field for Loaded Composite I-Beams Emulating Wind Turbine Blades , 2016 .