An integrated framework for distributed diagnosis of process and sensor faults

Complex engineering systems require efficient online fault diagnosis methodologies to improve safety and reduce maintenance costs. In complex systems, faults may occur in the process itself but also in the sensors monitoring the system, which makes the fault diagnosis task difficult, because the signals from which diagnostic reasoning takes place may be corrupted by faulty sensors. As such, many diagnosis solutions focus on either process or sensor faults, but not both. When considering both types of faults, additional diagnostic information is needed because of the additional ambiguity introduced by potentially faulted sensors. As such, traditional centralized diagnosis approaches, which already do not scale well, scale even worse. To address these issues, this paper presents a distributed diagnosis framework for physical systems applied to diagnosis of both sensor and process faults. Using a structural model decomposition method, we develop a distributed diagnoser design algorithm to build local fault diagnosers. These diagnosers are constructed based on global diagnosability analysis of the system, determining the minimal number of residuals required to have the maximum possible diagnosability in the system. We evaluate the design approach on a diagnostic benchmark system that is functionally representative of a spacecraft electrical power distribution system. Results demonstrate that the proposed distributed approach scales significantly better than a centralized approach.

[1]  X. Koutsoukos,et al.  Evaluation, Selection, and Application of Model-Based Diagnosis Tools and Approaches , 2007 .

[2]  Gautam Biswas,et al.  Designing Distributed Diagnosers for Complex Continuous Systems , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[3]  Matthew Daigle,et al.  A Qualitative Event-based Approach to Fault Diagnosis of Hybrid Systems , 2008 .

[4]  Gautam Biswas,et al.  An event-based distributed diagnosis framework using structural model decomposition , 2014, Artif. Intell..

[5]  Gautam Biswas,et al.  A Qualitative Event-Based Approach to Continuous Systems Diagnosis , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[6]  Stéphane Lafortune,et al.  On an Optimization Problem in Sensor Selection* , 2002, Discret. Event Dyn. Syst..

[7]  Gautam Biswas,et al.  Distributed Diagnosis in Formations of Mobile Robots , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[8]  Fu Xiao,et al.  AHU sensor fault diagnosis using principal component analysis method , 2004 .

[9]  Dingli Yu,et al.  Sensor fault diagnosis in a chemical process via RBF neural networks , 1999 .

[10]  Janos Gertler,et al.  Fault detection and diagnosis in engineering systems , 1998 .

[11]  Gautam Biswas,et al.  Improving Multiple Fault Diagnosability using Possible Conflicts , 2012 .

[12]  Raja Sengupta,et al.  Diagnosability of discrete-event systems , 1995, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[13]  Matthew Daigle,et al.  Diagnosability-Based Sensor Placement through Structural Model Decomposition , 2014 .

[14]  Rui Abreu,et al.  Third International Diagnostic Competition – DXC ’ 11 , 2011 .

[15]  Belkacem Ould Bouamama,et al.  Model-based Process Supervision: A Bond Graph Approach , 2008 .

[16]  Alexander Feldman,et al.  First International Diagnosis Competition - DXC'09 , 2009 .

[17]  A. Benveniste,et al.  Optimal sensor location for detecting changes in dynamical behavior , 1986, 1986 25th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[18]  Peter Struss,et al.  The Consistency-based Approach to Automated Diagnosis of Devices , 1996, KR 1996.

[19]  Rui Abreu,et al.  3rd International Diagnostics Competition– DXC’11 , 2011 .

[20]  Matthew Daigle,et al.  Qualitative Event-based Diagnosis with Possible Conflicts : Case Study on the Third International Diagnostic Competition , 2011 .

[21]  R. Rosenberg,et al.  System Dynamics: Modeling and Simulation of Mechatronic Systems , 2006 .

[22]  Daniel W. C. Ho,et al.  State/noise estimator for descriptor systems with application to sensor fault diagnosis , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[23]  Riti Singh,et al.  Gas Turbine Engine and Sensor Fault Diagnosis Using Optimization Techniques , 2002 .

[24]  Pieter J. Mosterman,et al.  Diagnosis of continuous valued systems in transient operating regions , 1999, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[25]  Indranil Roychoudhury,et al.  A structural model decomposition framework for systems health management , 2013, 2013 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[26]  Qing Zhao,et al.  LMI-based sensor fault diagnosis for nonlinear Lipschitz systems , 2007, Autom..