Transit Costs and Cost Efficiency: Bootstrapping Non-Parametric Frontiers

This paper explores a selection of recently proposed bootstrapping techniques to estimate non-parametric convex (DEA) cost frontiers and efficiency scores for transit firms. Using a sample of Norwegian bus operators, the key results can be summarized as follows: (i) the bias implied by uncorrected cost efficiency measures is numerically important (close to 25%), (ii) the bootstrapped-based test rejects the constant returns to scale hypothesis, and (iii) explaining patterns of efficiency scores using a two-stage bootstrapping approach detects only one significant covariate, in contrast to earlier results highlighting, e.g., the positive impact of high-powered contract types. Finally, comparing the average inefficiency obtained for the Norwegian data set with an analogous estimate for a smaller French sample illustrates how the estimated differences in average efficiency almost disappear once sample size differences are accounted for.(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

[1]  Attah K. Boame.  THE TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY OF CANADIAN URBAN TRANSIT SYSTEMS , 2004 .

[2]  Torben Holvad,et al.  Measuring inefficiency in the Norwegian bus industry using multi-directional efficiency analysis , 2004 .

[3]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes , 2007 .

[4]  W. Seitz.  Productive Efficiency in the Steam-Electric Generating Industry , 1971, Journal of Political Economy.

[5]  A. Charnes,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis Theory, Methodology and Applications , 1995 .

[6]  Rjm Jaraort.  THE ESTIMATION OF TRANSPORT COST FUNCTIONS: A METHODOLOGICAL REVIEW , 1982 .

[7]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Handbook of Transport Modelling , 2000 .

[8]  S. Grosskopf.  Statistical inference and nonparametric efficiency: A selective survey , 1996 .

[9]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Notes on some inequalities in economics , 2000 .

[10]  Anne Yvrande-Billon,et al.  Ownership, Contractual Practices and Technical Efficiency: The Case of Urban Public Transport in France , 2007 .

[11]  K. Obeng,et al.  RE-EXAMINATION OF INEFFICIENCIES IN URBAN TRANSIT SYSTEMS: A STOCHASTIC FRONTIER APPROACH , 1995 .

[12]  R. Färe,et al.  The measurement of efficiency of production , 1985 .

[13]  Anna Matas,et al.  Technical characteristics and efficiency of urban bus companies: The case of Spain , 1998 .

[14]  F Pedraja-Chaparro,et al.  On the quality of the data envelopment analysis model , 1999, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[15]  Robin C. Sickles,et al.  Panel estimators and the identification of firm-specific efficiency levels in parametric, semiparametric and nonparametric settings , 2005 .

[16]  J. Nolan,et al.  Identifying and measuring public policy goals: ISTEA and the US bus transit industry , 2002 .

[17]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Nonparametric Efficiency EstimationIn Stochastic Environments , 2002, Oper. Res..

[18]  Pål Andreas Pedersen,et al.  Estimating the inefficiency in the Norwegian bus industry from stochastic cost frontier models , 1997 .

[19]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Efficiency of urban public transit: A meta analysis , 2005 .

[20]  Kristiaan Kerstens,et al.  Public transit performance: What does one learn from frontier studies? , 2002 .

[21]  James Odeck,et al.  Evaluating efficiency in the Norwegian bus industry using data envelopment analysis , 2001 .

[22]  R. Färe,et al.  Profit, Directional Distance Functions, and Nerlovian Efficiency , 1998 .

[23]  B. Park,et al.  A NOTE ON THE CONVERGENCE OF NONPARAMETRIC DEA ESTIMATORS FOR PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY SCORES , 1998, Econometric Theory.

[24]  G. Battese,et al.  A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data , 1995 .

[25]  Jonathan Cowie,et al.  Organisation form, scale effects and efficiency in the British bus industry , 1999 .

[26]  Léopold Simar,et al.  Non-parametric tests of returns to scale , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[27]  R. Bartels,et al.  The Effect of Sample Size on the Mean Efficiency in DEA with an Application to Electricity Distribution in Australia, Sweden and New Zealand , 1998 .

[28]  R. Färe,et al.  The Structure of Technical Efficiency , 1983 .

[29]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Cost functions in transport , 2007 .

[30]  K. Kerstens.  Technical efficiency measurement and explanation of French urban transit companies , 1996 .

[31]  Marc Ivaldi,et al.  Incentive Regulatory Policies: The Case of Public Transit Systems in France , 2002 .

[32]  B. Starr McMullen,et al.  Accounting for emissions in the measurement of transit agency efficiency: A directional distance function approach , 2007 .

[33]  R. Spady,et al.  Hedonic Cost Functions for the Regulated Trucking Industry , 1978 .

[34]  Chris D. Orme,et al.  The Potential for Endogeneity Bias in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1996 .

[35]  Marc Ivaldi,et al.  Stochastic Frontiers and Asymmetric Information Models , 2002 .

[36]  K. Small,et al.  The economics of urban transportation , 2007 .

[37]  C. D. Kemp,et al.  Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis , 1987 .

[38]  K. Kerstens,et al.  The Performance of Bus Transit Operators , 2000 .

[39]  R. Färe,et al.  Productivity Developments in Swedish Hospitals: A Malmquist Output Index Approach , 1994 .

[40]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of Efficiency Scores: How to Bootstrap in Nonparametric Frontier Models , 1998 .

[41]  Léopold Simar,et al.  Advanced Robust and Nonparametric Methods in Efficiency Analysis: Methodology and Applications , 2007 .

[42]  Sergio R. Jara-Díaz,et al.  Calculation of Economies of Spatial Scope from Transport Cost Functions with Aggregate Output with an Application to the Airline Industry , 2005 .

[43]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Comparing mean efficiency and productivity scores from small samples: A bootstrap methodology , 1995 .

[44]  James Odeck,et al.  Congestion, ownership, region of operation, and scale: Their impact on bus operator performance in Norway , 2006 .

[45]  E. Mammen,et al.  On estimation of monotone and concave frontier functions , 1999 .

[46]  Dag Morten Dalen,et al.  Yardsticks on the road: Regulatory contracts and cost efficiency in the Norwegian bus industry , 2003 .

[47]  Harold O. Fried,et al.  The Measurement of Productive Efficiency and Productivity Growth , 2008 .

[48]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Statistical Inference in Nonparametric Frontier Models: The State of the Art , 1999 .

[49]  D. Primont,et al.  Multi-Output Production and Duality: Theory and Applications , 1994 .

[50]  Kofi Obeng,et al.  Sources of productivity change: a Malmquist total factor productivity approach , 2005 .

[51]  S. J. Díaz,et al.  The estimation of transport cost functions: a methodological review , 1982 .

[52]  Gisle Solvoll,et al.  THE COSTS OF BUS OPERATIONS IN NORWAY. , 1995 .

[53]  Léopold Simar,et al.  A general framework for frontier estimation with panel data , 1996 .

[54]  Rolf Färe,et al.  A Nonparametric Approach to Expenditure-Constrained Profit Maximization , 1990 .

[55]  Thierry Post,et al.  Erim Report Series Research in Management Methodological Advances in Dea: a Survey and an Application for the Dutch Electricity Sector Bibliographic Data and Classifications , 2022 .

[56]  M. Farrell.  The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[57]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Productivity and Undesirable Outputs: A Directional Distance Function Approach , 1995 .

[58]  Bruce W. Lamar,et al.  MEASURING TRANSIT PERFORMANCE USING DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS , 1992 .