Agromyces ramosus occurs in high numbers in many soils. It also is a known predator of various gram-positive and gram-negative soil bacteria, including Azotobacter vinelandii. Based on this, it would seem that, in natural soil, A. ramosus should control the population sizes of these soil bacteria. As a partial test of this assumption, we examined the possibility that soil might contain other bacterial predators that could hold A. ramosus in check. Three gram-negative bacterial predators of A. ramosus were isolated from soil. When one of these predators, strain N-1, was added to natural soil, it exhibited an attack – counter attack phenomenon in its interactions with A. ramosus. The indigenous A. ramosus cells in soil, or added A. ramosus cells, produced mycelium that approached, then lysed, approximately one-third of the N-1 cells. The surviving N-1 cells, however, then proceeded to lyse the A. ramosus mycelium, but not the rod-form cells that had fragmented from the mycelium. Strain N-1 then multiplied. ...
[1]
M. Alexander,et al.
Minimum bacterial density for bacteriophage replication: implications for significance of bacteriophages in natural ecosystems
,
1985,
Applied and environmental microbiology.
[2]
J. Germida,et al.
Ensifer adhaerens Predatory Activity Against Other Bacteria in Soil, as Monitored by Indirect Phage Analysis
,
1983,
Applied and environmental microbiology.
[3]
Casida Le.
Bacterial Predators of Micrococcus luteus in Soil.
,
1980
.
[4]
W. E. Gledhill,et al.
Predominant Catalase-negative Soil Bacteria. III. Agromyces, gen. n., Microorganisms Intermediary to Actinomyces and Nocardia.
,
1969,
Applied microbiology.
[5]
A. Lochhead.
Soil bacteria and growth-promoting substances.
,
1958,
Bacteriological reviews.
[6]
M. Alexander.
Why microbial predators and parasites do not eliminate their prey and hosts.
,
1981,
Annual review of microbiology.