Adults’ Self-Regulatory Behaviour Profiles in Blended Learning Environments and Their Implications for Design

Blended forms of learning have become increasingly popular. However, it remains unclear under what circumstances blended learning environments are successful. Studies suggest that blended learning challenges learners’ self-regulation. Yet little is known about what self-regulatory behaviour learners exhibit in such environments. This limited understanding is problematic since this insight is needed for effective designs. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify learners’ self-regulatory behaviour profiles in blended learning environments and to relate them to designs of blended learning environments. Learners’ (n = 120) self-regulatory behaviour in six ecologically valid blended learning courses was captured. Log files were analysed in a learning analytics fashion for frequency, diversity, and sequence of events. Three main user profiles were identified. The designs were described using a descriptive framework containing attributes that support self-regulation in blended learning environments. Results indicate fewer mis-regulators when more self-regulatory design features are integrated. These finding highlights the value of integrating features that support self-regulation in blended learning environments.

[1]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Self-regulated learning : from teaching to self-reflective practice , 1998 .

[2]  A. Cattell The Adult Learner – The Definitive Classic in Adult Education and Human Resource Development , 2005 .

[3]  Shalin Hai-Jew,et al.  Washington Online Virtual Campus: Infusing culture in dispersed Web-based higher education , 2004 .

[4]  A. Tough Major Learning Efforts: Recent Research and Future Directions , 1978 .

[5]  Stephen B. Dunbar,et al.  Complex, Performance-Based Assessment: Expectations and Validation Criteria , 1991 .

[6]  S. Gray Towards a Theory of Cultural Influence on the Development of Accounting Systems Internationally , 1988 .

[7]  Christine B. McCormick,et al.  Metacognition and Learning , 2003 .

[8]  M. Lepper,et al.  Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. , 1996 .

[9]  L. Taylor,et al.  Human Agency in Social Cognitive Theory , 1989 .

[10]  P. Winne,et al.  Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis , 1995 .

[11]  Daniel C. A. Hillman,et al.  Learner-Interface Interaction in Distance Education: An Extension of Contemporary Models and Strategies for Practitioners , 1994 .

[12]  Martin Oliver,et al.  Can ‘Blended Learning’ Be Redeemed? , 2005 .

[13]  Dirk Ifenthaler,et al.  Determining the effectiveness of prompts for self-regulated learning in problem-solving scenarios , 2012, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[14]  Beau Jones,et al.  Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction , 1990 .

[15]  M. Strandh,et al.  Second chance education matters! Income trajectories of poorly educated non-Nordics in Sweden , 2015 .

[16]  Dale H. Schunk,et al.  Teaching elementary students to self-regulate practice of mathematical skills with modeling. , 1998 .

[17]  Li Cao,et al.  The effect of distributed monitoring exercises and feedback on performance, monitoring accuracy, and self-efficacy , 2006 .

[18]  Philip H. Winne,et al.  Minimizing the black box problem to enhance the validity of theories about instructional effects , 1982 .

[19]  B. Hout-Wolters,et al.  Metacognition and learning: conceptual and methodological considerations , 2006 .

[20]  H. Lee Swanson,et al.  A Selective Synthesis of the Experimental Literature on Dynamic Assessment , 2001 .

[21]  Brian J. Reiser,et al.  Scaffolding Complex Learning: The Mechanisms of Structuring and Problematizing Student Work , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[22]  Philip H. Winne,et al.  Learning from Learning Kits: gStudy Traces of Students’ Self-Regulated Engagements with Computerized Content , 2006 .

[23]  Lynna J. Ausburn Course design elements most valued by adult learners in blended online education environments: an American perspective , 2004 .

[24]  Philip H. Winne,et al.  Measuring Self-Regulated Learning , 2000 .

[25]  Lisa Frankes,et al.  Teachers and Teaching: From Classroom to Reflection , 1993 .

[26]  Roger Hiemstra,et al.  Three underdeveloped models for adult learning , 1993 .

[27]  Philip H. Winne,et al.  Examining trace data to explore self-regulated learning , 2007 .

[28]  David J. Therriault,et al.  Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. , 2003 .

[29]  J. Vermunt,et al.  Patterns in Student Learning: Relationships Between Learning Strategies, Conceptions of Learning, and Learning Orientations , 2004 .

[30]  Adnan Boyacı Authentic Learning Environments in Higher Education , 2006 .

[31]  Jae-Won Moon Reflection in Learning and Professional Development: Theory and Practice , 2005 .

[32]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Knowing and Interacting: A Study of Culture, Practices, and Resources in a Grade 8 Open-Inquiry Science Classroom Guided by a Cognitive Apprenticeship Metaphor , 1995 .

[33]  P. Winne Steps toward Promoting Cognitive Achievements , 1985, The Elementary School Journal.

[34]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  Addressing the Challenges of Inquiry-Based Learning Through Technology and Curriculum Design , 1999 .

[35]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  Adaptive Human Scaffolding Facilitates Adolescents’ Self-regulated Learning with Hypermedia , 2005 .

[36]  Thomas C. Reeves,et al.  Meaningful interaction in web-based learning: A social constructivist interpretation , 2007, Internet High. Educ..

[37]  J. Dewey Experience and Nature , 1960 .

[38]  Phil Benson,et al.  Teaching and Researching: Autonomy in Language Learning , 2001 .

[39]  Basharat Hussain Dictionary of Probation and Offender Management , 2008 .

[40]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  Constructivism in the Collaboratory , 1995 .

[41]  Simon Hooper,et al.  Cooperative learning and computer-based instruction , 1992 .

[42]  R. Azevedo,et al.  Scaffolding Self-regulated Learning and Metacognition – Implications for the Design of Computer-based Scaffolds , 2005 .

[43]  John Hedberg,et al.  Dimensions of Learner Control A Reappraisal for Interactive Multimedia Instruction , 1995 .

[44]  Yen M. To,et al.  Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments , 2009, Internet High. Educ..

[45]  P. Kirschner,et al.  Three worlds of instructional design: State of the art and future directions , 2001 .

[46]  Cecily Heiner,et al.  Self-regulation of motivation when learning online: the importance of who, why and how , 2011 .

[47]  R. Azevedo,et al.  A Theoretical Review of Winne and Hadwin’s Model of Self-Regulated Learning: New Perspectives and Directions , 2007 .

[48]  Walter W. Wager,et al.  Authentic Activity as a Model for Appropriate Learning Activity: Implications for Design of Computer-Based Simulations , 1994 .

[49]  Susanne P. Lajoie Extending the Scaffolding Metaphor , 2005 .

[50]  Jason M. Harley,et al.  A multi-componential analysis of emotions during complex learning with an intelligent multi-agent system , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[51]  Linda Bol,et al.  Challenges in supporting self-regulation in distance education environments , 2011, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[52]  Allyson F. Hadwin,et al.  nStudy: Tracing and Supporting Self-Regulated Learning in the Internet , 2013 .

[53]  Dietrich Albert,et al.  Iterative augmentation of a medical training simulator: Effects of affective metacognitive scaffolding , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[54]  Jan Elen,et al.  In search of attributes that support self-regulation in blended learning environments , 2017, Education and Information Technologies.

[55]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (Mslq) , 1993 .

[56]  R. Azevedo Using Hypermedia as a Metacognitive Tool for Enhancing Student Learning? The Role of Self-Regulated Learning , 2005 .

[57]  W. Milheim,et al.  Theoretical bases for the use of learner control: Three different perspectives. , 1991 .

[58]  Sanna Järvelä,et al.  How elementary school students' motivation is connected to self-regulation , 2012 .

[59]  Tammy Schellens,et al.  Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[60]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Priciples and Guidlines , 2007 .

[61]  Jennifer A. Moon Reflection in learning and professional development , 1999 .

[62]  Barry J. Zimmerman,et al.  Self-Regulated Learning , 2001 .

[63]  Philip H. Winne,et al.  Studying as self-regulated learning. , 1998 .

[64]  Michael F. Young,et al.  Instructional design for situated learning , 1993 .

[65]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Self-Regulation and E-Learning , 2007, ECIS.

[66]  G. Wiggins Assessing student performance : exploring the purpose and limits of testing , 1993 .

[67]  S. Brookfield Understanding and Facilitating Adult Learning: A Comprehensive Analysis of Principles and Effective Practices , 1986 .

[68]  Robert C. Calfee,et al.  Handbook of educational psychology , 2013 .

[69]  Ramakrishnan Srikant,et al.  Mining sequential patterns , 1995, Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Data Engineering.

[70]  Tashfeen Ahmad Knowledge Management for Development: Domains, Strategies and Technologies for Developing Countries: Volume 35 of Integrated Series in Information Systems , 2017 .

[71]  Lyn Corno Comments on Winne: Analytic and systemic research are both needed , 1995 .

[72]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications. , 1994 .

[73]  J. Petraglia Reality by Design: The Rhetoric and Technology of Authenticity in Education , 1998 .

[74]  T. Jong,et al.  Software scaffolds to promote regulation during scientific inquiry learning , 2007 .

[75]  D. Garrison,et al.  Methodological Issues in the Content Analysis of Computer Conference Transcripts , 2007 .

[76]  P. Winne,et al.  Handbook of educational psychology , 2015 .

[77]  Charles M. Reigeluth,et al.  Instructional-Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory , 1999 .

[78]  M. Moore Editorial: Three types of interaction , 1989 .

[79]  M. Dembo,et al.  The Relationship Between Self-Regulation and Online Learning in a Blended Learning Context , 2004 .

[80]  N. Hatton,et al.  Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation , 1995 .

[81]  Tom Russell,et al.  Frames of Reflection: An Introduction , 2004 .

[82]  Leslie G. Valiant,et al.  Knowledge Infusion , 2006, AAAI.

[83]  P. Winne,et al.  Computing technologies as sites for developing self-regulated learning. , 1998 .

[84]  Deborah L. Butler,et al.  The Strategic Content Learning approach to promoting self-regulated learning : A report of three studies , 1998 .

[85]  L. Resnick,et al.  Knowing, Learning, and Instruction , 2018 .

[86]  A. Kitsantas,et al.  Supporting Self-Regulation in Student-Centered Web-Based Learning Environments , 2002 .

[87]  Gilbert Ritschard,et al.  Analyzing and Visualizing State Sequences in R with TraMineR , 2011 .

[88]  M. David Merrill,et al.  First principles of instruction , 2012 .

[89]  Eileen Wood,et al.  Cognitive strategy instruction for middle and high schools , 1995 .

[90]  Joachim Wirth Promoting Self-Regulated Learning Through Prompts , 2009 .

[91]  Binshan Lin,et al.  Web-based teaching and learner control: a research review , 2001, Comput. Educ..

[92]  Charles M. Reigeluth,et al.  What Is Instructional-Design Theory and How Is It Changing? , 1999 .

[93]  Philip H. Winne,et al.  Inherent details in self-regulated learning , 1995 .

[94]  Michael D. Williams,et al.  A Comprehensive Review of Learner-Control: The Role of Learner Characteristics. , 1993 .

[95]  J. Young "Hybrid" Teaching Seeks To End the Divide between Traditional and Online Instruction. , 2002 .

[96]  Chris Procter,et al.  Blended Learning in Practice , 2003 .

[97]  Vive Kumar,et al.  Supporting Self-Regulated Learning with gStudy Software: The Learning Kit Project ** , 2006 .

[98]  B. Wilson Constructivist Learning Environments: Case Studies in Instructional Design , 1995 .

[99]  E. Murphy,et al.  Second Chance Learners, Supporting Adults Learning Computer Programming , 2007 .

[100]  P. Pintrich A Conceptual Framework for Assessing Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning in College Students , 2004 .

[101]  Betty Collis,et al.  Course redesign for blended learning: modern optics for technical professionals , 2003 .

[102]  Gyeong Mi Heo A systematic review of technology to support adult learning in communities of practice , 2002 .

[103]  Walter W. Wager,et al.  Authentic Activity as a Model for Appropriate Learning Activity: Implications for Emerging Instructional Technologies , 1994 .

[104]  Anthony R. Artino,et al.  Think, feel, act: motivational and emotional influences on military students’ online academic success , 2009, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[105]  Candice Burkett,et al.  Self-regulated Learning with MetaTutor: Advancing the Science of Learning with MetaCognitive Tools , 2010 .

[106]  D. Garrison,et al.  Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education , 2004, Internet High. Educ..

[107]  Steve Graham,et al.  Writing and self-regulation: Cases from the self-regulated strategy development model. , 1998 .

[108]  S. Fagerhaugh,et al.  Participant Observation , 1979 .

[109]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Self-regulated learning and academic achievement : theoretical perspectives , 2001 .

[110]  Katherine S. Cennamo,et al.  Evolution of a Web-Enhanced Course: Incorporating Strategies for Self-Regulation , 2002 .

[111]  K. Mann,et al.  Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: a systematic review , 2009, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[112]  Kent J. Crippen,et al.  Promoting Self-Regulation in Science Education: Metacognition as Part of a Broader Perspective on Learning , 2006 .

[113]  Daniëlle Verstegen,et al.  The promised land of blended learning: Quizzes as a moderator , 2015 .

[114]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Delaying students' metacognitive monitoring improves their accuracy in predicting their recognition performance. , 1994 .

[115]  Mieke Brekelmans,et al.  Measuring students’ self-regulated learning in professional education: bridging the gap between event and aptitude measurements , 2015, Quality & Quantity.

[116]  D. Cicchetti Guidelines, Criteria, and Rules of Thumb for Evaluating Normed and Standardized Assessment Instruments in Psychology. , 1994 .

[117]  Diana Laurillard,et al.  Computers and the emancipation of students: giving control to the learner , 1987 .

[118]  L. Sutton The Principle of Vicarious Interaction in Computer-Mediated Communications , 2001 .

[119]  S. Puntambekar,et al.  Tools for Scaffolding Students in a Complex Learning Environment: What Have We Gained and What Have We Missed? , 2005 .

[120]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs , 2005 .

[121]  K. Scheiter,et al.  Learner Control in Hypermedia Environments , 2007 .

[122]  Philip H. Winne What is the state of the art in self-, co- and socially shared regulation in CSCL? , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[123]  Donatella Persico,et al.  Self-Regulated Learning , 2011 .

[124]  R. Garza,et al.  Latino and White High School Students' Perceptions of Caring Behaviors , 2009 .

[125]  Glenn Gordon Smith,et al.  Front-Stage and Back-Stage in Hybrid E-Learning Face-to-Face Courses , 2007 .

[126]  Mark William Johnson,et al.  Personal Learning Environments: Challenging the Dominant Design of Educational Systems , 2006, EC-TEL Workshops.

[127]  Allison Rossett The ASTD e-Learning Handbook: Best Practices, Strategies and Case Studies for an Emerging Field , 2001 .

[128]  Bram De Wever,et al.  Blended learning in adult education: towards a definition of blended learning , 2015 .

[129]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[130]  J. Keller Motivational Design for Learning and Performance , 2010 .

[131]  Kathryn Ley,et al.  Instructional principles for self-regulation , 2001 .

[132]  D. Boud,et al.  Reflection, turning experience into learning , 1985 .

[133]  B. Zimmerman Investigating Self-Regulation and Motivation: Historical Background, Methodological Developments, and Future Prospects , 2008, American Educational Research Journal.

[134]  Peter C. Honebein,et al.  Constructivism and the Design of Learning Environments: Context and Authentic Activities for Learning , 1993 .

[135]  Susan E. Newman,et al.  Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Craft of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics. Technical Report No. 403. , 1987 .

[136]  Mohammed J. Zaki,et al.  SPADE: An Efficient Algorithm for Mining Frequent Sequences , 2004, Machine Learning.

[137]  Philip H. Winne,et al.  A METACOGNITIVE VIEW OF INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN SELF-REGULATED LEARNING , 1996 .

[138]  Claire E. Weinstein,et al.  ASSESSING LEARNING STRATEGIES: THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE LASSI , 1988 .

[139]  M. Boekaerts,et al.  Self-Regulation in the Classroom: A Perspective on Assessment and Intervention , 2005 .

[140]  Donald A. Schön Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions , 1987 .

[141]  Thomas C. Reeves,et al.  Patterns of engagement in authentic online learning environments , 2003, ASCILITE.

[142]  Barry Harper,et al.  Designing real life cases to support authentic design activities , 2002 .