Central overweight and obesity in British youth aged 11–16 years: cross sectional surveys of waist circumference

Abstract Objective: To compare changes over time in waist circumference (a measure of central fatness) and body mass index (a measure of overall obesity) in British youth. Design: Representative cross sectional surveys in 1977, 1987, and 1997. Setting: Great Britain. Participants: Young people aged 11–16 years surveyed in 1977 (boys) and 1987 (girls) for the British Standards Institute (n=3784) and in 1997 (both sexes) for the national diet and nutrition survey (n=776). Main outcome measures: Waist circumference, expressed as a standard deviation score using the first survey as reference, and body mass index (weight(kg)/height(m)2), expressed as a standard deviation score against the British 1990 revised reference. Overweight and obesity were defined as the measurement exceeding the 91st and 98th centile, respectively. Results: Waist circumference increased sharply over the period between surveys (mean increases for boys and girls, 6.9 and 6.2 cm, or 0.84 and 1.02 SD score units, P<0.0001). In centile terms, waist circumference increased more in girls than in boys. Increases in body mass index were smaller and similar by sex (means 1.5 and 1.6, or 0.47 and 0.53 SD score units, P<0.0001). Waist circumference in 1997 exceeded the 91st centile in 28% (n=110) of boys and 38% (n=147) of girls (against 9% for both sexes in 1977-87, P<0.0001), whereas 14% (n=54) and 17% (n=68), respectively, exceeded the 98th centile (3% in 1977-87, P<0.0001). The corresponding rates for body mass index in 1997 were 21% (n=80) of boys and 17% (n=67) of girls exceeding the 91st centile (8% and 6% in 1977-87) and 10% (n=39) and 8% (n=32) exceeding the 98th centile (3% and 2% in 1977-87). Conclusions: Trends in waist circumference during the past 10–20 years have greatly exceeded those in body mass index, particularly in girls, showing that body mass index is a poor proxy for central fatness. Body mass index has therefore systematically underestimated the prevalence of obesity in young people. What is already known on this topic The prevalence of overweight and obesity in youth based on body mass index has increased over the past 10–20 years Body mass index gives no indication of body fat distribution Waist circumference is a marker for central body fat accumulation; a large waist circumference is linked to an increased risk of metabolic complications What this study adds Waist circumference in British youth has increased over the past 10–20 years at a greater rate than body mass index, the increase being greatest in females The accumulation of central body fat has risen more steeply than whole body fatness based on height and weight Current and future morbidity in British youth may be seriously affected due to accumulation of excess central fat

[1]  H. McCarthy,et al.  The development of waist circumference percentiles in British children aged 5.0–16.9 y , 2001, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[2]  J. Wells,et al.  The contribution of fat and fat-free tissue to body mass index in contemporary children and the reference child , 2002, International Journal of Obesity.

[3]  T. Cole,et al.  Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  L. Moreno,et al.  Secular changes in body fat patterning in children and adolescents of Zaragoza (Spain), 1980–1995 , 2001, International Journal of Obesity.

[5]  W. Tamborlane,et al.  Fat distribution and cardiovascular risk factors in obese adolescent girls: importance of the intraabdominal fat depot. , 1996, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[6]  S. Daniels,et al.  Utility of different measures of body fat distribution in children and adolescents. , 2000, American journal of epidemiology.

[7]  I. Buchan,et al.  Prevalence of overweight and obese children between 1989 and 1998: population based series of cross sectional studies , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  T J Cole,et al.  Body mass index reference curves for the UK, 1990. , 1995, Archives of disease in childhood.

[9]  A. R. Frisancho Physical Status: The Use and Interpretation of Anthropometry , 1996, The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[10]  S. Chinn,et al.  Prevalence and trends in overweight and obesity in three cross sectional studies of British children, 1974-94 , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  D. Freedman,et al.  Relation of circumferences and skinfold thicknesses to lipid and insulin concentrations in children and adolescents: the Bogalusa Heart Study. , 1999, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[12]  P. Nilsson-ehle,et al.  Waist measurement correlates to a potentially atherogenic lipoprotein profile in obese 12–14–year‐old children , 1994, Acta paediatrica.

[13]  Sally Robinson,et al.  National diet and nutrition survey: young people aged 4 to 18 years , 2001 .

[14]  P. Brambilla,et al.  Peripheral and abdominal adiposity in childhood obesity. , 1994, International journal of obesity and related metabolic disorders : journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[15]  Sheila M. Williams,et al.  Evaluation of waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and the conicity index as screening tools for high trunk fat mass, as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, in children aged 3-19 y. , 2000, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[16]  L. Moreno,et al.  Fat distribution in obese and nonobese children and adolescents. , 1998, Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition.

[17]  A. Roche,et al.  Childhood body composition in relation to body mass index. , 2001, Pediatrics.

[18]  D. Kerr,et al.  Anthropometric measurement error and the assessment of nutritional status , 1999, British Journal of Nutrition.