Contextual Information and Reappraisal of Negative Emotional Events

In this study the effect of the contextual-information induced reappraisal on modifying the emotional response elicited by failure has been investigated. To an academic or job setting failure (control condition) it has been added one of two types of contextual information (knowing that many other people failed the same task and knowing that it would be possible to try the failed task again) affecting three dimensions of failure appraisal: responsibility, sharing, and remediability. In an experimental condition both information were added. Four hundred and eighty undergraduates participated in this study. The experimental design was a 2 (negative emotional event) x 4 (contextual information) between-subjects design. The first variable was included in the design as covariate. We expected that generalized failure should imply a decrease of responsibility and an increase of sharing, the possibility of retrying should imply an increase in the remediability, and that the presence of both types of information should produce all the abovementioned effects. Our findings substantially corroborated the hypotheses.

[1]  James J Gross,et al.  Unpacking Cognitive Reappraisal: Goals, Tactics, and Outcomes Henderson, and Ama Thrasher for Their Help with Task Construction and Data Collection , 2022 .

[2]  J. Gross.  The Emerging Field of Emotion Regulation: An Integrative Review , 1998 .

[3]  J. Gabrieli,et al.  Gender Differences in Emotion Regulation: An fMRI Study of Cognitive Reappraisal , 2008, Group processes & intergroup relations : GPIR.

[4]  R. Levenson,et al.  Turn down the volume or change the channel? Emotional effects of detached versus positive reappraisal. , 2012, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  C. Carver,et al.  Assessing coping strategies: a theoretically based approach. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  Andrus Viidik,et al.  Age and gender differences in negative affect—Is there a role for emotion regulation? , 2005 .

[7]  Kevin N. Ochsner,et al.  For better or for worse: neural systems supporting the cognitive down- and up-regulation of negative emotion , 2004, NeuroImage.

[8]  P. Young,et al.  Emotion and personality , 1963 .

[9]  J. Gross,et al.  Explicit and implicit emotion regulation: A dual-process framework , 2011, Cognition & emotion.

[10]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  J. Gross,et al.  The Neural Bases of Emotion Regulation: Reappraisal and Suppression of Negative Emotion , 2008, Biological Psychiatry.

[12]  R. Lazarus.  Psychological stress and the coping process , 1970 .

[13]  S. Folkman,et al.  Stress, appraisal, and coping , 1974 .

[14]  O. Matarazzo,et al.  Regret, Choice, and Outcome , 2008 .

[15]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. , 2014, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[16]  R. Lazarus,et al.  SHORT-CIRCUITING OF THREAT BY EXPERIMENTALLY ALTERING COGNITIVE APPRAISAL. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[17]  R. Lazarus,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL REDUCTION OF STRESS BASED ON EGO-DEFENSE THEORY. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[18]  Craig A. Smith,et al.  Patterns of appraisal and emotion related to taking an exam. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  John A Bargh,et al.  The unconscious regulation of emotion: nonconscious reappraisal goals modulate emotional reactivity. , 2009, Emotion.

[20]  P. Gollwitzer,et al.  Effects of failure on subsequent performance: the importance of self-defining goals. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.