Use of the CRISPR/Cas9 System to Produce Genetically Engineered Pigs from In Vitro-Derived Oocytes and Embryos1

ABSTRACT Targeted modification of the pig genome can be challenging. Recent applications of the CRISPR/Cas9 system hold promise for improving the efficacy of genome editing. When a designed CRISPR/Cas9 system targeting CD163 or CD1D was introduced into somatic cells, it was highly efficient in inducing mutations. When these mutated cells were used with somatic cell nuclear transfer, offspring with these modifications were created. When the CRISPR/Cas9 system was delivered into in vitro produced presumptive porcine zygotes, the system was effective in creating mutations in eGFP, CD163, and CD1D (100% targeting efficiency in blastocyst stage embryos); however, it also presented some embryo toxicity. We could also induce deletions in CD163 or CD1D by introducing two types of CRISPRs with Cas9. The system could also disrupt two genes, CD163 and eGFP, simultaneously when two CRISPRs targeting two genes with Cas9 were delivered into zygotes. Direct injection of CRISPR/Cas9 targeting CD163 or CD1D into zygotes resulted in piglets that have mutations on both alleles with only one CD1D pig having a mosaic genotype. We show here that the CRISPR/Cas9 system can be used by two methods. The system can be used to modify somatic cells followed by somatic cell nuclear transfer. System components can also be used in in vitro produced zygotes to generate pigs with specific genetic modifications.

[1]  Wei Li,et al.  One-step generation of knockout pigs by zygote injection of CRISPR/Cas system , 2014, Cell Research.

[2]  B. N. Day,et al.  Complete activation of porcine oocytes induced by the sulfhydryl reagent, thimerosal. , 1997, Biology of reproduction.

[3]  R. Palmiter,et al.  Production of transgenic rabbits, sheep and pigs by microinjection , 1985, Nature.

[4]  Rongfeng Li,et al.  Activation method does not alter abnormal placental gene expression and development in cloned pigs , 2010, Molecular reproduction and development.

[5]  Rongfeng Li,et al.  Method of oocyte activation affects cloning efficiency in pigs , 2009, Molecular reproduction and development.

[6]  Rongfeng Li,et al.  Scriptaid corrects gene expression of a few aberrantly reprogrammed transcripts in nuclear transfer pig blastocyst stage embryos. , 2011, Cellular reprogramming.

[7]  Yongxiang Zhao,et al.  Heritable gene targeting in the mouse and rat using a CRISPR-Cas system , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[8]  C. Murphy,et al.  An Intact Sialoadhesin (Sn/SIGLEC1/CD169) Is Not Required for Attachment/Internalization of the Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus , 2013, Journal of Virology.

[9]  K. Yoshioka,et al.  Birth of Piglets Derived from Porcine Zygotes Cultured in a Chemically Defined Medium1 , 2002, Biology of reproduction.

[10]  R. Prather,et al.  Creating genetically modified pigs by using nuclear transfer , 2003, Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E.

[11]  D. B. Carter,et al.  Phenotyping of transgenic cloned piglets. , 2002, Cloning and stem cells.

[12]  W H Lamers,et al.  Electroporation in 'intracellular' buffer increases cell survival. , 1992, Nucleic acids research.

[13]  R. Prather,et al.  Production of cloned pigs by using somatic cells as donors. , 2003, Cloning and stem cells.

[14]  L. Spate,et al.  Piglets produced from cloned blastocysts cultured in vitro with GM‐CSF , 2013, Molecular reproduction and development.

[15]  R. Prather,et al.  Advancing swine models for human health and diseases. , 2013, Missouri medicine.

[16]  Wei Li,et al.  Generation of PPARγ mono-allelic knockout pigs via zinc-finger nucleases and nuclear transfer cloning , 2011, Cell Research.

[17]  K. Wells,et al.  Compound Transgenics: Recombinase-Mediated Gene Stacking , 2014 .

[18]  Colin D. Johnson,et al.  Assessment of the economic impact of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome on swine production in the United States. , 2005, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[19]  J. Doudna,et al.  RNA-guided genetic silencing systems in bacteria and archaea , 2012, Nature.

[20]  Le Cong,et al.  Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems , 2013, Science.

[21]  L. Spate,et al.  1 ARGININE SUPPLEMENTATION IN VITRO INCREASES PORCINE EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT AND AFFECTS mRNA TRANSCRIPT EXPRESSION , 2011 .

[22]  R. Prather,et al.  Genetic modifications of pigs for medicine and agriculture , 2011, Molecular reproduction and development.

[23]  Yolanda Santiago,et al.  Efficient generation of a biallelic knockout in pigs using zinc-finger nucleases , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Rudolf Jaenisch,et al.  One-Step Generation of Mice Carrying Mutations in Multiple Genes by CRISPR/Cas-Mediated Genome Engineering , 2013, Cell.

[25]  Yifan Dai,et al.  Targeted disruption of the α1,3-galactosyltransferase gene in cloned pigs , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[26]  Kwang-Wook Park,et al.  Production of α-1,3-Galactosyltransferase Knockout Pigs by Nuclear Transfer Cloning , 2002, Science.

[27]  Natalie A. Borg,et al.  CD1d–lipid-antigen recognition by the semi-invariant NKT T-cell receptor , 2007, Nature.

[28]  R. Prather,et al.  Gene targeting with zinc finger nucleases to produce cloned eGFP knockout pigs , 2011, Molecular reproduction and development.

[29]  L. Spate,et al.  Significant Improvement in Cloning Efficiency of an Inbred Miniature Pig by Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor Treatment after Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer1 , 2009, Biology of reproduction.

[30]  R. Prather,et al.  Optimization of square-wave electroporation for transfection of porcine fetal fibroblasts , 2010, Transgenic Research.

[31]  H. Nauwynck,et al.  Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus entry into the porcine macrophage. , 2010, The Journal of general virology.

[32]  T. Marshall,et al.  Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2010: an update. , 2011, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[33]  Mamoru Ito,et al.  Abnormalities in cloned mice are not transmitted to the progeny , 2002, Genesis.

[34]  Lei Wang,et al.  Generation of Gene-Modified Cynomolgus Monkey via Cas9/RNA-Mediated Gene Targeting in One-Cell Embryos , 2014, Cell.

[35]  L. Spate,et al.  Histone deacetylase inhibitors improve in vitro and in vivo developmental competence of somatic cell nuclear transfer porcine embryos. , 2010, Cellular reprogramming.

[36]  R. Palmiter,et al.  Factors affecting the efficiency of introducing foreign DNA into mice by microinjecting eggs. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  R. Terns,et al.  CRISPR-based adaptive immune systems. , 2011, Current opinion in microbiology.

[38]  C. Murphy,et al.  Production of biallelic CMP-Neu5Ac hydroxylase knock-out pigs , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[39]  C. Barbas,et al.  ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering. , 2013, Trends in biotechnology.

[40]  R. Roberts,et al.  Engraftment of human iPS cells and allogeneic porcine cells into pigs with inactivated RAG2 and accompanying severe combined immunodeficiency , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  B. Whitelaw,et al.  Live pigs produced from genome edited zygotes , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[42]  Jeffry D. Sander,et al.  Efficient In Vivo Genome Editing Using RNA-Guided Nucleases , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.