Rationality, Cognitive Bias, and Artificial Intelligence: A Structural Perspective on Quantum Cognitive Science

Human beings are not completely rational; there is some irrationality, as well as bounded rationality, involved in the nature of human thinking. It has been shown through recent advances in quantum cognitive science that certain aspects of human irrationality, such as cognitive biases in the Kahneman-Tversky tradition, can be explained via mathematical models borrowed from quantum physics. It has also been shown in quantum cognitive science that human rationality exhibits a special sort of non-classical phenomenon as observed in quantum physics as well, namely the phenomenon of contextuality, which extends the notion of non-locality, what Einstein called “spooky action at a distance”. In the present paper we elucidate and articulate the nature of human rationality and irrationality as observed in cognitive bias experiments and cognitive contextuality experiments. And we address the question whether non-human agents, such as animals and robots, can exhibit the same sort of cognitive biases and cognitive contextuality. Technically, we shed new light on these (quantum) cognitive experiments from the viewpoint of logic and category theory. We argue, inter alia, that the logic of cognition is substructural or monoidal, rather than Cartesian (which encompasses classical, intuitionistic, etc.), just as the logic of quantum mechanics and information is substructural or monoidal. The logic of reality is thus intertwined with the logic of cognition; the logical link between physical reality and the conscious mind would possibly allow us to go beyond the Cartesian dualism separating matter and mind as intrinsically different entities.

[1]  Mark W. Altom,et al.  Given versus induced category representations: use of prototype and exemplar information in classification. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  Yoshihiro Maruyama The Frame Problem, Gödelian Incompleteness, and the Lucas-Penrose Argument: A Structural Analysis of Arguments About Limits of AI, and Its Physical and Metaphysical Consequences , 2017, PT-AI.

[3]  Richard M. Shiffrin,et al.  Context effects produced by question orders reveal quantum nature of human judgments , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Samson Abramsky,et al.  Logical Bell Inequalities , 2012, ArXiv.

[5]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choice under Conflict: The Dynamics of Deferred Decision , 1992 .

[6]  Samson Abramsky,et al.  The sheaf-theoretic structure of non-locality and contextuality , 2011, 1102.0264.

[7]  H. Simon Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning , 1991 .

[8]  Yoshihiro Maruyama Contextuality Across the Sciences: Bell-Type Theorems in Physics and Cognitive Science , 2019, CONTEXT.

[9]  Yoshihiro Maruyama,et al.  AI, Quantum Information, and External Semantic Realism: Searle's Observer-Relativity and Chinese Room, Revisited , 2013, PT-AI.

[10]  A. Sen,et al.  Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory , 1977 .

[11]  Samson Abramsky,et al.  A categorical semantics of quantum protocols , 2004, LICS 2004.

[12]  David W. Moore Measuring New Types of Question-Order Effects: Additive and Subtractive , 2002 .

[13]  J. Busemeyer,et al.  A quantum probability explanation for violations of ‘rational’ decision theory , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  Matt Jones,et al.  On contextuality in behavioural data , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[15]  Yoshihiro Maruyama,et al.  Compositionality and Contextuality: The Symbolic and Statistical Theories of Meaning , 2019, CONTEXT.

[16]  A. Kitaoka,et al.  Illusory Motion Reproduced by Deep Neural Networks Trained for Prediction , 2018, Front. Psychol..

[17]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  Snow Queen Is Evil and Beautiful: Experimental Evidence for Probabilistic Contextuality in Human Choices , 2017, Decision.

[18]  Arvind Narayanan,et al.  Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases , 2016, Science.

[19]  Yoshihiro Maruyama Quantum Pancomputationalism and Statistical Data Science: From Symbolic to Statistical AI, and to Quantum AI , 2017, PT-AI.

[20]  Peter Jipsen,et al.  Residuated lattices: An algebraic glimpse at sub-structural logics , 2007 .

[21]  A. Tversky,et al.  Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness , 1972 .

[22]  D. Chalmers The conscious mind: in search of a fundamental theory , 1996 .

[23]  Stephen Clark,et al.  Mathematical Foundations for a Compositional Distributional Model of Meaning , 2010, ArXiv.

[24]  Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh,et al.  Experimental Support for a Categorical Compositional Distributional Model of Meaning , 2011, EMNLP.

[25]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision , 2012 .