Look, no hands: A perceptual task shows that number magnitude induces shifts of attention
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Takeshi Hatta,et al. Spatial structure of quantitative representation of numbers: Evidence from the SNARC effect , 2004, Memory & cognition.
[2] C. Spence,et al. Tactile-Visual Links in Exogenous Spatial Attention under Different Postures: Convergent Evidence from Psychophysics and ERPs , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[3] K. Heilman,et al. Pseudoneglect: Effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task , 1980, Neuropsychologia.
[4] W. Schwarz,et al. Psychophysiological evidence that the SNARC effect has its functional locus in a response selection stage. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[5] S. Dehaene,et al. The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .
[6] Yves Rossetti,et al. Interference between number processing and line bisection: a methodology , 2005, Neuropsychologia.
[7] Giovanni Galfano,et al. Number magnitude orients attention, but not against one’s will , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[8] Marco Zorzi,et al. Temporal order judgment reveals how number magnitude affects visuospatial attention , 2007, Cognition.
[9] G. Aschersleben,et al. The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework of perception and action , 2001 .
[10] M. Nicholls,et al. Free-viewing perceptual asymmetries for the judgement of brightness, numerosity and size , 1999, Neuropsychologia.
[11] M. Nicholls,et al. The greyscales task: a perceptual measure of attentional bias following unilateral hemispheric damage , 2004, Neuropsychologia.
[12] Daniela Mapelli,et al. The SNARC effect: an instance of the Simon effect? , 2003, Cognition.
[13] M. McCourt. Performance consistency of normal observers in forced-choice tachistoscopic visual line bisection , 2001, Neuropsychologia.
[14] W. Schwarz,et al. Searching for the functional locus of the SNARC effect: Evidence for a response-related origin , 2005, Memory & cognition.
[15] M. McCourt,et al. Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks , 2000, Neuropsychologia.
[16] Yang Seok Cho,et al. Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.
[17] Mark E. McCourt,et al. Visuospatial attention in line bisection: stimulusmodulation of pseudoneglect , 1999, Neuropsychologia.
[18] Wim Fias,et al. The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized , 2003, Cognition.
[19] Jeff Miller,et al. Stimulus-Response Compatibility and the Motor System , 1982, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[20] Wim Fias,et al. Automatic response activation of implicit spatial information: Evidence from the SNARC effect. , 2006, Acta psychologica.
[21] A. Kingstone,et al. The number line effect reflects top-down control , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[22] M. H. Fischer,et al. Number processing induces spatial performance biases , 2001, Neurology.
[23] Michael D. Dodd,et al. Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.
[24] R. C. Oldfield. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.
[25] Marco Zorzi,et al. Visuospatial priming of the mental number line , 2008, Cognition.
[26] Wolf Schwarz,et al. Moving the eyes along the mental number line: Comparing SNARC effects with saccadic and manual responses , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.