Look, no hands: A perceptual task shows that number magnitude induces shifts of attention

The mental representation of numbers along a line oriented left to right affects spatial cognition, facilitating responses in the ipsilateral hemispace (the spatial-numerical association of response codes [SNARC] effect). We investigated whether the number/space association is the result of an attentional shift or response selection. Previous research has often introduced covert left/right response cues by presenting targets to the left or the right. The present study avoided left/right cues by requiring forced choice upper/lower luminance discriminations to two mirror-reversed luminance gradients (the grayscale task). The grayscale stimuli were overlaid with strings of (1) low numbers, (2) high numbers, and (3) nonnumerical characters. In Experiment 1, 20 dextrals judged the number’s magnitude and then indicated whether the upper/lower grayscale was darker. Results showed leftward and rightward attentional biases for low and high numbers, respectively. Demands to process numbers along a left/right line were made less explicit in Experiment 2 (N=8 dextrals), using (1) a parity judgment and (2) arbitrary linguistic labels for top/bottom. Once again, a spatial congruency effect was observed. Because the response (up/down) was orthogonal to the dimension of interest (left/right), the effect of number cannot be attributed to late-stage response congruencies. This study required unspeeded responses to stimuli presented in free vision, whereas other experiments have used speeded responses. Understanding the time course of number-space effects may, therefore, be important to the debate associated with response selection.

[1]  Takeshi Hatta,et al.  Spatial structure of quantitative representation of numbers: Evidence from the SNARC effect , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[2]  C. Spence,et al.  Tactile-Visual Links in Exogenous Spatial Attention under Different Postures: Convergent Evidence from Psychophysics and ERPs , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  K. Heilman,et al.  Pseudoneglect: Effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task , 1980, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  W. Schwarz,et al.  Psychophysiological evidence that the SNARC effect has its functional locus in a response selection stage. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[5]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[6]  Yves Rossetti,et al.  Interference between number processing and line bisection: a methodology , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  Giovanni Galfano,et al.  Number magnitude orients attention, but not against one’s will , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Temporal order judgment reveals how number magnitude affects visuospatial attention , 2007, Cognition.

[9]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework of perception and action , 2001 .

[10]  M. Nicholls,et al.  Free-viewing perceptual asymmetries for the judgement of brightness, numerosity and size , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  M. Nicholls,et al.  The greyscales task: a perceptual measure of attentional bias following unilateral hemispheric damage , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  Daniela Mapelli,et al.  The SNARC effect: an instance of the Simon effect? , 2003, Cognition.

[13]  M. McCourt Performance consistency of normal observers in forced-choice tachistoscopic visual line bisection , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  W. Schwarz,et al.  Searching for the functional locus of the SNARC effect: Evidence for a response-related origin , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[15]  M. McCourt,et al.  Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  Yang Seok Cho,et al.  Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  Mark E. McCourt,et al.  Visuospatial attention in line bisection: stimulusmodulation of pseudoneglect , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  Wim Fias,et al.  The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized , 2003, Cognition.

[19]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Stimulus-Response Compatibility and the Motor System , 1982, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[20]  Wim Fias,et al.  Automatic response activation of implicit spatial information: Evidence from the SNARC effect. , 2006, Acta psychologica.

[21]  A. Kingstone,et al.  The number line effect reflects top-down control , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[22]  M. H. Fischer,et al.  Number processing induces spatial performance biases , 2001, Neurology.

[23]  Michael D. Dodd,et al.  Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Visuospatial priming of the mental number line , 2008, Cognition.

[26]  Wolf Schwarz,et al.  Moving the eyes along the mental number line: Comparing SNARC effects with saccadic and manual responses , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.