Study of the thrust–drag balance with a swimming robotic fish

A robotic fish is used to test the validity of a simplification made in the context of fish locomotion. With this artificial aquatic swimmer, we verify that the momentum equation results from a simple balance between a thrust and a drag that can be treated independently in the small amplitude regime. The thrust produced by the flexible robot is proportional to A2f2, where A and f are the respective tail-beat amplitude and oscillation frequency, irrespective of whether or not f coincides with the resonant frequency of the fish. The drag is proportional to U02, where U0 is the swimming velocity. These three physical quantities set the value of the Strouhal number in this regime. For larger amplitudes, we found that the drag coefficient is not constant but increases quadratically with the fin amplitude. As a consequence, the achieved locomotion velocity decreases, or the Strouhal number increases, as a function of the fin amplitude.A robotic fish is used to test the validity of a simplification made in the context of fish locomotion. With this artificial aquatic swimmer, we verify that the momentum equation results from a simple balance between a thrust and a drag that can be treated independently in the small amplitude regime. The thrust produced by the flexible robot is proportional to A2f2, where A and f are the respective tail-beat amplitude and oscillation frequency, irrespective of whether or not f coincides with the resonant frequency of the fish. The drag is proportional to U02, where U0 is the swimming velocity. These three physical quantities set the value of the Strouhal number in this regime. For larger amplitudes, we found that the drag coefficient is not constant but increases quadratically with the fin amplitude. As a consequence, the achieved locomotion velocity decreases, or the Strouhal number increases, as a function of the fin amplitude.

[1]  I. E. Garrick Propulsion of a flapping and oscillating airfoil , 1936 .

[2]  M. Triantafyllou,et al.  Oscillating foils of high propulsive efficiency , 1998, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[3]  Auke Jan Ijspeert,et al.  Salamandra Robotica II: An Amphibious Robot to Study Salamander-Like Swimming and Walking Gaits , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[4]  Ramiro Godoy-Diana,et al.  Behind the performance of flapping flyers , 2010 .

[5]  Maurizio Porfiri,et al.  Swimming Robots Have Scaling Laws, Too , 2016, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[6]  M. Lighthill Hydromechanics of Aquatic Animal Propulsion , 1969 .

[7]  Michael S. Triantafyllou,et al.  Forces on oscillating foils for propulsion and maneuvering , 2003 .

[8]  L. Mahadevan,et al.  Scaling macroscopic aquatic locomotion , 2014, Nature Physics.

[9]  T. Kambe,et al.  Hydromechanics of lunate-tail swimming propulsion. Part 2 , 1977, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[10]  R. Mittal,et al.  Wake topology and hydrodynamic performance of low-aspect-ratio flapping foils , 2006, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[11]  Geoffrey Spedding,et al.  Lunate-tail swimming propulsion. Part 2. Performance analysis , 1990, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[12]  A. Smits,et al.  Scaling the propulsive performance of heaving flexible panels , 2013, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[13]  August G. Domel,et al.  On the rules for aquatic locomotion , 2017 .

[14]  H. Sung,et al.  Hydrodynamics of a self-propelled flexible fin near the ground , 2017 .

[15]  Florine Paraz,et al.  Thrust generation by a heaving flexible foil: Resonance, nonlinearities, and optimality , 2016 .

[16]  R. Bainbridge,et al.  The Speed of Swimming of Fish as Related to Size and to the Frequency and Amplitude of the Tail Beat , 1958 .

[17]  Paolo Dario,et al.  A compliant bioinspired swimming robot with neuro-inspired control and autonomous behavior , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[18]  Alexander J Smits,et al.  The wake structure and thrust performance of a rigid low-aspect-ratio pitching panel , 2008, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[19]  Maarja Kruusmaa,et al.  A bio-inspired compliant robotic fish: Design and experiments , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[20]  Peter A. Dewey,et al.  Scaling laws for the thrust production of flexible pitching panels , 2013, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[21]  Mattia Gazzola,et al.  Gait and speed selection in slender inertial swimmers , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  A. Smits,et al.  Flow speed has little impact on propulsive characteristics of oscillating foils , 2017, 1707.05608.

[23]  R. Godoy-Diana,et al.  Modelling of an actuated elastic swimmer , 2017, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[24]  P. Oshkai,et al.  Effect of the stiffness, inertia and oscillation kinematics on the thrust generation and efficiency of an oscillating-foil propulsion system , 2015 .

[25]  Melissa A. Green,et al.  Effects of three-dimensionality on thrust production by a pitching panel , 2008, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[26]  G. K. Batchelor,et al.  An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics: Contents , 2000 .

[27]  Christopher J. Esposito,et al.  A robotic fish caudal fin: effects of stiffness and motor program on locomotor performance , 2012, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[28]  G. Lauder,et al.  Dynamics of freely swimming flexible foils , 2011 .

[29]  M. Triantafyllou,et al.  An Efficient Swimming Machine , 1995 .

[30]  M. Lighthill Note on the swimming of slender fish , 1960, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[31]  T. Theodorsen General Theory of Aerodynamic Instability and the Mechanism of Flutter , 1934 .

[32]  E. de Langre,et al.  Reconfiguration of elastic blades in oscillatory flow , 2018, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[33]  Adrian L. R. Thomas,et al.  Flying and swimming animals cruise at a Strouhal number tuned for high power efficiency , 2003, Nature.

[34]  M. Triantafyllou,et al.  Wake mechanics for thrust generation in oscillating foils , 1991 .

[35]  A. Smits,et al.  Scaling the propulsive performance of heaving and pitching foils , 2017, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[36]  Florine Paraz,et al.  Experimental study of the response of a flexible plate to a harmonic forcing in a flow , 2014 .

[37]  J. Wesfreid,et al.  Stabilizing effect of flexibility in the wake of a flapping foil , 2012, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[38]  M. Triantafyllou,et al.  Hydrodynamics of Fishlike Swimming , 2000 .

[39]  F. Fish,et al.  Strouhal numbers and optimization of swimming by odontocete cetaceans , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[40]  M. Lighthill Aquatic animal propulsion of high hydromechanical efficiency , 1970, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[41]  M. Triantafyllou,et al.  Optimal Thrust Development in Oscillating Foils with Application to Fish Propulsion , 1993 .

[42]  Peter A. Dewey,et al.  Hydrodynamic wake resonance as an underlying principle of efficient unsteady propulsion , 2011, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[43]  F. Bianchi,et al.  Wind turbine control systems , 2006 .

[44]  Michael S. Triantafyllou,et al.  Performance of flapping foil propulsion , 2005 .