An immobilization system for claustrophobic patients in head-and-neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

PURPOSE To evaluate the effectiveness of an immobilization treatment system used for claustrophobic patients in head-and-neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS Instead of the thermoplastic facemask, the Vac Fix (S & S Par Scientific, Odense, Denmark) mold is used for immobilization of claustrophobic patients at the University of Florida in head-and-neck IMRT. The immobilization procedure combines the use of commercial stereotactic infrared (IR) ExacTrac camera system (BrainLAB, Inc., Westchester, IL) for patient setup and monitoring. The Vac Fix mold is placed on the headrest and folded up as needed to provide support before the mold is hardened. For the camera system, a frame referred to as a "tattoo-free immobilization accessory" is fabricated, on which the IR markers can be placed. A patient-specific dental impression is made with the bite tray. The movement of the markers, connected through the dental impression of the patient, accurately represents the overall patient motion. Patient movement is continuously monitored and repositioning is performed whenever patient movement exceeds the predefined tolerance limit. Monitored patient movements are recorded at a certain frequency. Recorded data are analyzed and compared with those of patients immobilized with the thermoplastic facemask plus the camera system that is the standard immobilization system in our clinic. RESULTS For three patients treated with the Vac Fix mold plus the camera system, on average, the histogram-based uncertainties, U(95)(5), U(95)(20), and mean displacement, R(mean) (mm) were 1.03, 1.08, and 0.60, respectively. These values are close to those obtained with the mask plus the camera system. The Vac Fix mold plus the camera system often requires more beam interruptions because of repositioning than the mask plus the camera system (on average, the Vac Fix mold plus the camera system required repositioning 7.7 times and the mask plus the camera system required repositioning 1.8 times during 20 treatments). CONCLUSION The Vac Fix mold immobilization procedure plus the camera monitoring system has been set up for patients who are claustrophobic or cannot tolerate a mask during head-and-neck IMRT. Although this system causes more frequent beam delivery interruptions, it is as effective as the mask plus the camera system in immobilizing patients within the tolerance limit.

[1]  Jatinder R Palta,et al.  Evaluation of intrafraction patient movement for CNS and head & neck IMRT. , 2004, Medical physics.

[2]  J. Tsai,et al.  Dosimetric verification of the dynamic intensity-modulated radiation therapy of 92 patients. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  Steve Webb,et al.  Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  Shinichi Shimizu,et al.  Three-dimensional intrafractional movement of prostate measured during real-time tumor-tracking radiotherapy in supine and prone treatment positions. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  A L Boyer,et al.  Dosimetric effects of patient displacement and collimator and gantry angle misalignment on intensity modulated radiation therapy. , 2000, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[6]  S L Meeks,et al.  Preliminary experience with frameless stereotactic radiotherapy. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  G T Chen,et al.  Initial clinical experience with a video-based patient positioning system. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  Shinichi Shimizu,et al.  Tumor location, cirrhosis, and surgical history contribute to tumor movement in the liver, as measured during stereotactic irradiation using a real-time tumor-tracking radiotherapy system. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  D Yan,et al.  The use of on-line image verification to estimate the variation in radiation therapy dose delivery. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  A new non-invasive and relocatable immobilization frame for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. , 1998, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[11]  P. M. Len,et al.  111 Clinical experience of breathing synchronized radiotherapy procedure at the University of California Davis Cancer Center , 1999 .

[12]  R Bale,et al.  Repositioning accuracy: comparison of a noninvasive head holder with thermoplastic mask for fractionated radiotherapy and a case report. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  M. V. van Herk,et al.  Precise and real-time measurement of 3D tumor motion in lung due to breathing and heartbeat, measured during radiotherapy. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  R Mohan,et al.  The effect of setup uncertainty on normal tissue sparing with IMRT for head-and-neck cancer. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  H D Kubo,et al.  Accuracy of a photogrammetry-based patient positioning and monitoring system for radiation therapy. , 1999, Medical physics.

[16]  C. Enke,et al.  Immobilization devices for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). , 2001, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[17]  Dirk Verellen,et al.  Quality assurance of a system for improved target localization and patient set-up that combines real-time infrared tracking and stereoscopic X-ray imaging. , 2003, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[18]  S L Meeks,et al.  Image localization for frameless stereotactic radiotherapy. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  J Szanto,et al.  A prospective comparison of three systems of patient immobilization for prostate radiotherapy. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  Mark P. Carol,et al.  Peacock™: A system for planning and rotational delivery of intensity‐modulated fields , 1995, Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol..

[21]  J. Buatti,et al.  The University of Florida frameless high-precision stereotactic radiotherapy system. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  J. Tsai,et al.  A non-invasive immobilization system and related quality assurance for dynamic intensity modulated radiation therapy of intracranial and head and neck disease. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  D. Brizel,et al.  Comparison of two head and neck immobilization systems. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  S L Meeks,et al.  A high-precision system for conformal intracranial radiotherapy. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.