International standards for PMU and tests for compliance: the synchrophasor standard

Phasor measurement unit (PMU) devices, and the standards to govern PMUs, have progressed since the first standard appeared in 1995. The early standards contained significant ambiguities in the definition of the phasor time - tagging, and no independent verification facilities existed to test compliance with the standards. The latest standards, as a result of significant effort on the part of the IEEE working group, contain extremely detailed test descriptions and requirements. The standards are also supported by a number of facilities/companies which are capable of independently verifying compliance, using traceable amplitude and time/phase measurement chains. This provides a high level of confidence in a basic interoperability of PMU devices during "normal" operation. However, as the power network evolves in the future, with dynamic events becoming more commonplace, and imperfect power quality becoming perhaps the "norm", care still needs to be exercised since the actual PMU outputs during dynamic and imperfect network conditions are still specific to the actual device hardware, algorithm/filter, and configuration/settings.

[1]  Zhenyu Huang,et al.  Performance evaluation of phasor measurement systems , 2008, 2008 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting - Conversion and Delivery of Electrical Energy in the 21st Century.

[2]  G. Brunello,et al.  An overview of the IEEE Standard C37.118.2 — Synchrophasor Data Transfer for Power Systems , 2014 .

[3]  James S. Thorp,et al.  IEEE Standard for Synchrophasors for Power Systems , 1998 .

[4]  Andrew J. Roscoe Frequency tracking, C37.118.1a compliant, P and M class PMU (Phasor Measurement Unit) algorithm examples for MATLAB Simulink , 2014 .

[5]  Mladen Kezunovic Verifying interoperability and application performance of PMUs and PMU-enabled IEDs at the device and system level , 2012, 2012 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies (ISGT).

[6]  Jean-Pierre Braun,et al.  Calibration of PMUs with a reference grade calibrator , 2014, 29th Conference on Precision Electromagnetic Measurements (CPEM 2014).

[7]  Kenneth E. Martin,et al.  Synchrophasor Measurements Under the IEEE Standard C37.118.1-2011 With Amendment C37.118.1a , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[8]  Javier Oscar Fernandez The Virginia Tech Calibration System , 2011 .

[9]  Z.A. Styczynski,et al.  Practical Experience with PMU System Testing and Calibration Requirements , 2008, 2008 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting - Conversion and Delivery of Electrical Energy in the 21st Century.

[10]  G. M. Burt,et al.  P and M Class Phasor Measurement Unit Algorithms Using Adaptive Cascaded Filters , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[11]  Richard Pirret Testing and Calibration of Phasor Measurement Units , 2012 .

[12]  Andrew J. Roscoe,et al.  Filter Design Masks for C37.118.1a-Compliant Frequency-Tracking and Fixed-Filter M-Class Phasor Measurement Units , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[13]  Vahid Madani,et al.  An overview of the new IEC 61850 synchrophasor publish-subscribe profile , 2013, 2013 66th Annual Conference for Protective Relay Engineers.

[14]  L. Nordstrom,et al.  Modeling Security of Power Communication Systems Using Defense Graphs and Influence Diagrams , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[15]  Andrew J. Roscoe,et al.  Exploring the Relative Performance of Frequency-Tracking and Fixed-Filter Phasor Measurement Unit Algorithms Under C37.118 Test Procedures, the Effects of Interharmonics, and Initial Attempts at Merging P-Class Response With M-Class Filtering , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.