Influence of background/surrounding area on accuracy of visual color matching

IntroductionVisual shade selection is subjective and influenced by factors that might be operator-dependent or not. The objective was to evaluate influence of observer nonrelated factors (background/surrounding area, and light) and observer-related factors (gender and color competence) on shade-matching quality and to identify the most often mismatched shades in correlation with the background.MethodsTen observers with average or superior color discrimination competence according to ISO TR 28642:2011 were asked to match 48 shade tabs of three VITA Classical shade guides, in a viewing booth under two light sources: D65 and D50. Gray, white, black, red, and light blue background/surrounding area simulated various clinical situations. The results were statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U test. Post hoc power analyses and sample size calculations were also conducted.ResultsThe matching scores ranged between 72.7 % (using blue background) and 85.9 % (using white and black backgrounds). There was a statistically significant difference between matching scores on the five backgrounds (χ2(4) = 12.67, p = 0.01). When neutral gray was used as reference, Mann-Whitney U value was statistically significant only for the blue background (U = 107.00, Z = −2.52, p = 0.01). The influence of gender and lighting condition was also assessed, no statistically significance being found, but in both cases, the effect size and the achieved power were small. However, color discrimination competence did influence the results (p < 0.01). Background influenced shade matching results for tabs A3, B3, B4, and D4.ConclusionsWithin the limitations of this study, it was concluded that1.When it comes to the influence of the background/surround area on quality of color matching, no difference among achromatic backgrounds was recorded. Significantly worse results were recorded when the blue background was used.2.Observers with superior color matching competence performed significantly better than the ones with average competence3.The most frequently mismatched shade tabs were A3.5, B3, B4, and D4.

[1]  Esam Tashkandi,et al.  Evaluation of self shade matching ability of dental students using visual and instrumental means. , 2012, Journal of dentistry.

[2]  William M Johnston,et al.  Variation in color between intended matched shade and fabricated shade of dental porcelain. , 2002, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[3]  Salma A Bahannan,et al.  Shade matching quality among dental students using visual and instrumental methods. , 2014, Journal of dentistry.

[4]  Rade D Paravina,et al.  New shade guide for tooth whitening monitoring: visual assessment. , 2008, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[5]  Rade D Paravina,et al.  Critical appraisal. Color in dentistry: improving the odds of correct shade selection. , 2009, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].

[6]  Rade D Paravina,et al.  Colour discrimination of dental professionals and colour deficient laypersons. , 2011, Journal of dentistry.

[7]  Allyson A Barrett,et al.  Visual and instrumental agreement in dental shade selection: three distinct observer populations and shade matching protocols. , 2009, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[8]  W. Johnston,et al.  Minimum color differences for discriminating mismatch between composite and tooth color. , 2001, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].

[9]  Y-K Lee,et al.  Effects of colour measuring mode and light source on the colour of shade guides. , 2002, Journal of Oral Rehabilitation.

[10]  P. Rammelsberg,et al.  Evaluation of two different approaches to learning shade matching in dentistry , 2012, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[11]  William M Johnston,et al.  Coverage error of three conceptually different shade guide systems to vital unrestored dentition. , 2007, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[12]  William M Johnston,et al.  Color measurement in dentistry. , 2009, Journal of dentistry.

[13]  A. Braun,et al.  Spectrophotometric evaluation of a novel aesthetic composite resin with respect to different backgrounds in vitro , 2011, Odontology.

[14]  J. Preston,et al.  Color science and dental art : a self-teaching program , 1980 .

[15]  C. Groh,et al.  A New, Small-color-difference Equation for Dental Shades , 1990, Journal of dental research.

[16]  Gerwin Arnetzl,et al.  Does gender and experience influence shade matching quality? , 2009, Journal of dentistry.

[17]  Rade D Paravina,et al.  Performance assessment of dental shade guides. , 2009, Journal of dentistry.

[18]  S. P. Davison,et al.  Shade selection by color vision-defective dental personnel. , 1990, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[19]  R. J. Goodkind,et al.  Interdependence of the hue, value, and chroma in the middle site of anterior human teeth. , 1994, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[20]  Stephen J Chu,et al.  Dental color matching instruments and systems. Review of clinical and research aspects. , 2010, Journal of dentistry.

[21]  R J Goodkind,et al.  Three-dimensional color coordinates of natural teeth compared with three shade guides. , 1990, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[22]  R. Paravina,et al.  Development of a Model Shade Guide for Primary Teeth , 2008, European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry.

[23]  Q. Li,et al.  In vivo spectroradiometric evaluation of colour matching errors among five shade guides. , 2009, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[24]  M. Balkaya,et al.  Visual and instrumental evaluation of color match ability of 2 shade guides on a ceramic system. , 2012, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[25]  Yong-Keun Lee,et al.  Influence of illuminants on the color distribution of shade guides. , 2006, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[26]  A. Yoshida,et al.  Spectrophotometric analysis of tooth color reproduction on anterior all-ceramic crowns: Part 1: analysis and interpretation of tooth color. , 2010, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].

[27]  L. Sharpe,et al.  Sex-related differences in chromatic sensitivity , 2008, Visual Neuroscience.

[28]  Mark D Fairchild,et al.  Color appearance models and complex visual stimuli. , 2010, Journal of dentistry.

[29]  E. Klemetti,et al.  Shade selection performed by novice dental professionals and colorimeter. , 2006, Journal of Oral Rehabilitation.

[30]  Avishai Sadan,et al.  Comparison of the shade matching ability of dental students using two light sources. , 2006, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[31]  R. Paravina Evaluation of a newly developed visual shade-matching apparatus. , 2002, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[32]  W K Tam,et al.  Dental shade matching using a digital camera. , 2012, Journal of dentistry.

[33]  Paul Feuerstein,et al.  Shade matching. , 2003, Journal of the Massachusetts Dental Society.

[34]  Avishai Sadan,et al.  Shade-matching abilities of dental laboratory technicians using a commercial light source. , 2009, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[35]  John D. Mollon,et al.  Color discrimination in carriers of color deficiency , 2004, Vision Research.

[36]  Holger A Jakstat,et al.  Toothguide Trainer tests with color vision deficiency simulation monitor. , 2010, Journal of dentistry.

[37]  D Byrne,et al.  The influence of some different factors on the accuracy of shade selection. , 2004, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[38]  Ihab A Hammad,et al.  Intrarater repeatability of shade selections with two shade guides. , 2003, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.