Validation of short term recall of mobile phone use for the Interphone study

Aim: To validate short term recall of mobile phone use within Interphone, an international collaborative case control study of tumours of the brain, acoustic nerve, and salivary glands related to mobile telephone use. Methods: Mobile phone use of 672 volunteers in 11 countries was recorded by operators or through the use of software modified phones, and compared to use recalled six months later using the Interphone study questionnaire. Agreement between recalled and actual phone use was analysed using both categorical and continuous measures of number and duration of phone calls. Results: Correlations between recalled and actual phone use were moderate to high (ranging from 0.5 to 0.8 across countries) and of the same order for number and duration of calls. The kappa statistic demonstrated fair to moderate agreement for both number and duration of calls (weighted kappa ranging from 0.20 to 0.60 across countries). On average, subjects underestimated the number of calls per month (geometric mean ratio of recalled to actual = 0.92, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.99), whereas duration of calls was overestimated (geometric mean ratio = 1.42, 95% CI 1.29 to 1.56). The ratio of recalled to actual use increased with level of use, showing underestimation in light users and overestimation in heavy users. There was substantial heterogeneity in this ratio between countries. Inter-individual variation was also large, and increased with level of use. Conclusions: Volunteer subjects recalled their recent phone use with moderate systematic error and substantial random error. This large random error can be expected to reduce the power of the Interphone study to detect an increase in risk of brain, acoustic nerve, and parotid gland tumours with increasing mobile phone use, if one exists.

[1]  E Cardis,et al.  Mobile phone use and risk of acoustic neuroma: results of the Interphone case–control study in five North European countries , 2005, British Journal of Cancer.

[2]  Monique F. Kilkenny,et al.  International case-control study of adult brain, head and neck tumours : Results of the feasibility study , 1999 .

[3]  D. Altman,et al.  Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading , 1995, The Lancet.

[4]  Joseph K. McLaughlin,et al.  Epidemiologic studies of cellular telephones and cancer risk: a review , 2002 .

[5]  B Hocking,et al.  Mobile phone use and risk of acoustic neuroma , 2006, British Journal of Cancer.

[6]  M Dosemeci,et al.  Does nondifferential misclassification of exposure always bias a true effect toward the null value? , 1990, American journal of epidemiology.

[7]  N. Dreyer,et al.  Utility of telephone company records for epidemiologic studies of cellular telephones. , 1996, Epidemiology.

[8]  S J Hepworth,et al.  Recall of past use of mobile phone handsets. , 2003, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[9]  B G Armstrong,et al.  Effect of measurement error on epidemiological studies of environmental and occupational exposures. , 1998, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[10]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies , 1999, Statistical methods in medical research.

[11]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[12]  D. Krewski,et al.  Health risks of electromagnetic fields. Part II: Evaluation and assessment of radio frequency radiation. , 2003, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[13]  Per Hall,et al.  Mobile Phone Use and the Risk of Acoustic Neuroma , 2004, Epidemiology.

[14]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Practical statistics for medical research , 1990 .

[15]  J Schüz,et al.  Cellular telephones and risk for brain tumors , 2005, Neurology.

[16]  N. Birkett,et al.  Effect of nondifferential misclassification on estimates of odds ratios with multiple levels of exposure. , 1992, American journal of epidemiology.

[17]  Maria Blettner,et al.  Assessment of radiofrequency exposure from cellular telephone daily use in an epidemiological study: German Validation study of the international case–control study of cancers of the brain—INTERPHONE-Study , 2005, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[18]  Maria Blettner,et al.  Validation of self-reported cellular phone use , 2004, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[19]  Mustafa Dosemeci,et al.  RE: “DOES NONDIFFERENTIAL MISCLASSIFICATION OF EXPOSURE ALWAYS BIAS A TRUE EFFECT TOWARD THE NULL VALUE?” , 1991 .

[20]  Joachim Schüz,et al.  Cellular telephone use and risk of acoustic neuroma. , 2004, American journal of epidemiology.

[21]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[22]  Per Hall,et al.  Long-term mobile phone use and brain tumor risk. , 2005, American journal of epidemiology.