Student Achievement, Behavior, Perceptions, and Other Factors Affecting ACT Scores. ACT Research Report Series, 2006-1.

In this study, we investigated factors related to students’ performance on the ACT. We examined how students’ background characteristics, academic achievement in high school, education-related accomplishments and activities, and perceptions of self and others affect their ACT scores. Of particular interest were the direct and indirect effects of students’ background characteristics, given their other characteristics. To study this issue, we estimated a multi-group, multi-level structural model. We found that among both African American and Caucasian American students, ACT Composite score was directly influenced only by academic achievement in high school. Family income, parents’ level of education, and number of negative situations in the home were related to ACT Composite score only indirectly, through education-related accomplishments and activities, perceptions of self and others, and academic achievement. Moreover, education-related accomplishments and activities and perceptions of self and others had only indirect effects through academic achievement. These findings showed that, regardless of their race/ethnicity, students can increase their chances of doing well on the ACT, and thus increase their chances o f enrolling and succeeding in

[1]  Tom Haladyna,et al.  A Causal Analysis of Attitude toward Mathematics. , 1983 .

[2]  B. Weiner An attributional theory of motivation and emotion , 1986 .

[3]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  Elizabeth E. Graham,et al.  A longitudinal study of college students’ communication competence , 1990 .

[5]  S. Harter A new self-report scale of intrinsic versus extrinsic orientation in the classroom: Motivational and informational components. , 1981 .

[6]  B. Muthén,et al.  Multilevel Covariance Structure Analysis , 1994 .

[7]  B. Zimmerman A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. , 1989 .

[8]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[9]  James B. Schreiber,et al.  After-School Pursuits, Ethnicity, and Achievement for 8th- and 10th-Grade Students , 2002 .

[10]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. , 1977 .

[11]  G. Musoba,et al.  Merit-Aware Admissions in Public Universities. , 2002 .

[12]  D. Schunk Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective , 1991 .

[13]  Alex Casillas,et al.  Motivational and Skills, Social, and Self-Management Predictors of College Outcomes: Constructing the Student Readiness Inventory , 2005 .

[14]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  Communication apprehension and self‐perceived communication competence of at‐risk students , 1992 .

[15]  J. Beane,et al.  Self-concept, self-esteem, and the curriculum , 1984 .

[16]  B. Muthén Latent variable modeling in heterogeneous populations , 1989 .

[17]  Thomas Bliesener,et al.  Some High-risk Adolescents do not Develop Conduct Problems: A Study of Protective Factors , 1994 .

[18]  D. Hamachek Self-Concept and School Achievement: Interaction Dynamics and a Tool for Assessing the Self-Concept Component. , 1995 .

[19]  T. Cross,et al.  Why the End of Affirmative Action Would Exclude All But a Very Few Blacks from America's Leading Universities and Graduate Schools. , 1997 .

[20]  Ilene S. Cooper How the Boys Are , 2005 .

[21]  R. Sawyer Accuracy of Self-Reported High School Courses and Grades of College-Bound Students. , 1988 .

[22]  Bengt Muthén,et al.  Multilevel latent variable modeling in multiple populations , 1997 .

[23]  B. Byrne,et al.  On the Structure of Adolescent Self-Concept. , 1986 .

[24]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications , 1988 .

[25]  Albert Satorra,et al.  A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis , 1999 .

[26]  Deborah J. Stipek,et al.  Motivation to Learn: From Theory to Practice , 1992 .

[27]  J. Noble,et al.  Relationships between the Noncognitive Characteristics, High School Course Work and Grades, and Test Scores of ACT-Tested Students. ACT Research Report 99-4. , 1999 .

[28]  Charles Rooney,et al.  Test Scores Do Not Equal Merit: Enhancing Equity & Excellence in College Admissions by Deemphasizing SAT and ACT Results. , 1998 .

[29]  J L Schafer,et al.  Multiple Imputation for Multivariate Missing-Data Problems: A Data Analyst's Perspective. , 1998, Multivariate behavioral research.

[30]  Julie IMoble,et al.  Differential Coursework and Grades in High School: Implications for Performance on the ACT Assessment , 1989 .

[31]  G. Wehlage,et al.  School Reform for At‐Risk Students , 1991 .

[32]  Gene V. Glass,et al.  Politics, Markets, and America's Schools , 1990 .

[33]  L. J. Stricker,et al.  SEX DIFFERENCES IN SAT® PREDICTIONS OF COLLEGE GRADES , 1991 .