Group Decision Support Systems and Group Communication

This study investigated a range of impacts that a computerized group decision support system (GDSS) might have on group decision-making processes. A general model posited 13 possible GDSS impacts. The research strategy was to identify which of these impacts were likely to result for the specific GDSS and for the budget allocation task employed in this study and to focus on these in data collection and analysis. The design contrasted (a) groups using a computerized GDSS with (b) groups using a manual, paper-and-pencil version of the GDSS and with (c) baseline groups given no support system. GDSS impacts were measured by interaction analysis of group decision-making processes. Results partially supported our predictions and suggested some changes in the model. Results suggested that the GDSS improved the organization of the decision-making process but that it may have led to less thorough and critical discussion.

[1]  David W. Wright,et al.  Small group communication research of the 1970's: A synthesis and critique , 1980 .

[2]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  The Effectiveness of Nominal, Delphi, and Interacting Group Decision Making Processes , 1974 .

[3]  M. S. Poole,et al.  Communication and Group Decision-Making , 1986 .

[4]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group processes in computer-mediated communication☆ , 1986 .

[5]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Using a GDSS to Facilitate Group Consensus: Some Intended and Unintended Consequences , 1988, MIS Q..

[6]  George P. Huber,et al.  Effects of size and spatial arrangements on group decision making. , 1974 .

[7]  M. E. Shaw.  Group dynamics : the psychology of small group behavior , 1971 .

[8]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[9]  Mason Haire,et al.  Modern Organization Theory. , 1960 .

[10]  J. Valacich,et al.  Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups , 1990 .

[11]  Poppy Lauretta McLeod,et al.  An Assessment of the Experimental Literature on Electronic Support of Group Work: Results of a Meta-Analysis , 1992, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[12]  R. Watson.  A study of group decision support system use in three and four-person groups for a preference alloca , 1987 .

[13]  Janet Fulk,et al.  Organizations and Communication Technology , 1990 .

[14]  E. Berscheid,et al.  Group Dynamics: The Psychology of Small Group Behavior. 3rd ed. , 1981 .

[15]  George P. Huber,et al.  Issues in the Design of Group Decision Support Systems , 1984, MIS Q..

[16]  M. S. Poole,et al.  Decision Development in Small Groups IV A Typology of Group Decision Paths , 1989 .

[17]  Marshall Scott,et al.  Microlevel Structuration in Computer-Supported Group Decision Making , 1992 .

[18]  Sarah Sanderson King,et al.  High-Speed Management: A Revolution in Organizational Communication in the 1990s , 1993 .

[19]  G. Huber.  The Nature and Design of Post-Industrial Organizations , 1984 .

[20]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  A foundation for the study of group decision support systems , 1987 .

[21]  S. R. Hiltz,et al.  Experiments in group decision making: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. , 1986 .

[22]  Michael E. Holmes,et al.  Conflict management in a computer-supported meeting in a computer supported meeting environment , 1991 .

[23]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Computer-based systems for cooperative work and group decision making , 1988, CSUR.

[24]  E. B. Kerr.  CHAPTER 3 – Acceptance and Usage of Computer-Mediated Communication Systems , 1982 .

[25]  Ernest G. Bormann,et al.  Discussion and group methods : theory and practice , 1968 .

[26]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Comprehensiveness and restrictiveness in group decision heuristics: effects of computer support on consensus decision making , 1989, ICIS '89.

[27]  K. Weick.  The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[28]  G. Homans.  The human group , 1952 .

[29]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[30]  C. Steinfield,et al.  A Social Influence Model of Technology use , 1990 .

[31]  Lorne Olfman,et al.  The user interface in group decision support systems , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..

[32]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  COMPUTER-SUPPORTED MEETINGS: BUILDING A RESEARCH ENVIRONMENT. , 1988 .

[33]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  The impact of technological support on groups: An assessment of the empirical research , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..

[34]  R. E. Miles,et al.  Organizations: New Concepts for New Forms , 1986 .

[35]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[36]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Understanding the use of Group Decision Support Systems: The Theory of Adaptive Structuration , 1990 .

[37]  Steven W. Duck,et al.  Studying Interpersonal Interaction , 1992 .