How well do we know northern land cover? Comparison of four global vegetation and wetland products with a new ground‐truth database for West Siberia

[1] An unprecedented collection of 2161 geolocated, irregularly spaced field observations of land cover spanning ∼106 km2 throughout West Siberia suggests that currently available land cover classification products are remarkably poor indicators of vegetation type and water body extent in this northern wetland environment. The ground-truth data are compared with (1) the Global Land Cover Characteristics database derived from Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer data (GLCC.AVHRR), (2) the Global Land Cover Classification derived from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer data (GLCC.MODIS), (3) the Global Lakes and Wetlands Database (GLWD), and (4) the West Siberian Lowland Peatland Database (WSLPD) using: (1) all land cover categories and (2) permanent wetland and water body categories only. Overall agreement with ground observations of land cover is only 21% for the GLCC.AVHRR database and 11% for the GLCC.MODIS database. However, at a much broader scale (one degree of latitude) there is improved qualitative agreement between vegetation classes, with some notable exceptions: (1) at low latitudes (∼54°N–58°N), both the GLCC.AVHRR and GLCC.MODIS databases underestimate woody savannas in favor of croplands; (2) at midlatitudes (∼58°N–64°N), the GLCC.AVHRR database underestimates evergreen needleleaf forest in favor of mixed forest; and (3) at high latitudes (∼64°N–68°N), both the GLCC.AVHRR and GLCC.MODIS databases underestimate deciduous needleleaf forest in favor of woody savannas or open shrublands, respectively. It is clear that all four data databases significantly underestimate permanent wetlands and water bodies, although those specifically developed for this purpose (GLWD and WSPLD) perform better than the more widely used, multiclass land cover products. For permanent wetlands, agreement with our ground data is only 2% for GLCC.MODIS, 23% for GLCC.AVHRR, 45% for GLWD and 56% for WSLPD. Agreement with open water bodies is even poorer (0–5%). These results raise into question the efficacy of incorporating currently available land cover products into terrestrial ecosystem models in northern wetland environments.

[1]  F. Chapin,et al.  Global Warming and Terrestrial Ecosystems: A Conceptual Framework for Analysis , 2000 .

[2]  L. Smith,et al.  Peatlands of the Western Siberian lowlands: current knowledge on zonation, carbon content and Late Quaternary history , 2003 .

[3]  N. Panikov,et al.  Fluxes of CO2 and CH4 in high latitude wetlands: measuring, modelling and predicting response to climate change , 1999 .

[4]  A A Velichko,et al.  Siberian Peatlands a Net Carbon Sink and Global Methane Source Since the Early Holocene , 2004, Science.

[5]  F. Chapin,et al.  Role of Land-Surface Changes in Arctic Summer Warming , 2005, Science.

[6]  D. Elliott-Fisk.  The boreal forest , 1988 .

[7]  Paul J. Curran,et al.  Forest ecosystem simulation modelling: the role of remote sensing , 1999 .

[8]  Walter C. Oechel,et al.  Recent change of Arctic tundra ecosystems from a net carbon dioxide sink to a source , 1993, Nature.

[9]  P. Martikainen,et al.  Effect of water-level drawdown on global climatic warming: northern peatlands , 1996 .

[10]  G. Kling,et al.  Arctic Lakes and Streams as Gas Conduits to the Atmosphere: Implications for Tundra Carbon Budgets , 1991, Science.

[11]  Alan H. Strahler,et al.  Global land cover mapping from MODIS: algorithms and early results , 2002 .

[12]  P. Döll,et al.  Development and validation of a global database of lakes, reservoirs and wetlands , 2004 .

[13]  K. E. Freyb,et al.  Peatlands of the Western Siberian lowlands : current knowledge on zonation , carbon content and Late Quaternary history , 2003 .

[14]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  A dynamic global vegetation model for studies of the coupled atmosphere‐biosphere system , 2005 .

[15]  L. Smith,et al.  Recent temperature and precipitation increases in West Siberia and their association with the Arctic Oscillation , 2003 .

[16]  Ramakrishna R. Nemani,et al.  Implementation of a hierarchical global vegetation classification in ecosystem function models , 1996 .

[17]  E. Gorham.  The future of research in canadian peatlands: A brief survey with particular reference to global change , 1994, Wetlands.

[18]  B. DeAngelo,et al.  TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEM FEEDBACKS TO GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE , 1997 .

[19]  D. Tufford,et al.  Wetlands In Danger : a World Conservation Atlas , 1996 .

[20]  Thomas R. Loveland,et al.  The IGBP-DIS global 1 km land cover data set , 1997 .

[21]  Durham Dh,et al.  Environmental variation, vegetation distribution, carbon dynamics and water/energy exchange at high latitudes , 2002 .

[22]  R. Betts,et al.  Amazonian forest dieback under climate-carbon cycle projections for the 21st century , 2004 .

[23]  R. Neilson,et al.  Estimated migration rates under scenarios of global climate change , 2002 .

[24]  Y. Sheng,et al.  A high‐resolution GIS‐based inventory of the west Siberian peat carbon pool , 2004 .

[25]  Glen A MacDonald,et al.  U.S.‐Russia venture probes Siberian peatlands' sensitivity to climate , 2000 .

[26]  P. Lafleur,et al.  Northern fens: methane flux and climatic change , 1992 .

[27]  John R. Jensen,et al.  Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective , 1986 .

[28]  Stephen Sitch,et al.  Methane flux from northern wetlands and tundra : An ecosystem source modelling approach , 1996 .

[29]  Tim R. Moore,et al.  Uncertainty in Predicting the Effect of Climatic Change on the Carbon Cycling of Canadian Peatlands , 1998 .

[30]  Limin Yang,et al.  Development of a global land cover characteristics database and IGBP DISCover from 1 km AVHRR data , 2000 .

[31]  F. Chapin,et al.  Evidence and Implications of Recent Climate Change in Northern Alaska and Other Arctic Regions , 2004 .

[32]  W M Davis,et al.  A GRADUATE SCHOOL OF GEOGRAPHY. , 2010, Science.

[33]  J. Holden,et al.  The storage and aging of continental runoff in large reservoir systems of the world , 1997 .

[34]  C. Markon,et al.  The utility of estimating net primary productivity over Alaska using baseline AVHRR data , 2002 .

[35]  L. D. Hinzman,et al.  Disappearing Arctic Lakes , 2005, Science.

[36]  Fritz H. Schweingruber,et al.  Large‐scale treeline changes recorded in Siberia , 2004 .

[37]  J. Smol,et al.  Rapid response of treeline vegetation and lakes to past climate warming , 1993, Nature.

[38]  E. Gorham.  Northern Peatlands: Role in the Carbon Cycle and Probable Responses to Climatic Warming. , 1991, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[39]  Ian M. Mason,et al.  A New Global Lakes Database for a Remote Sensing Program Studying Climatically Sensitive Large Lakes , 1995 .

[40]  Timothy G. F. Kittel,et al.  Global and regional modelling of Arctic–boreal vegetation distribution and its sensitivity to altered forcing , 2000, Global change biology.

[41]  R. Aravena,et al.  Holocene Treeline History and Climate Change Across Northern Eurasia , 2000, Quaternary Research.

[42]  M. Sturm,et al.  Climate change: Increasing shrub abundance in the Arctic , 2001, Nature.