Imaging in diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of stone patients.

Imaging has an essential role in the diagnosis, management, and follow-up of patients with stone disease. A variety of imaging modalities are available to the practicing urologist, including conventional radiography (KUB), intravenous urography (IVU), ultrasound (US), magnetic resonance urography, and computed tomography (CT) scans, each with its advantages and limitations. Traditionally, IVU was considered the gold standard for diagnosing renal calculi, but this modality has largely been replaced by unenhanced spiral CT scans at most centers. Renal US is recommended as the initial imaging modality for suspected renal colic in pregnant women and children, but recent literature suggests that a low-dose CT scan may be safe in pregnancy. Intraoperative imaging by fluoroscopy or US plays a large part in assisting the urologist with the surgical intervention chosen for the individual stone patient. Posttreatment imaging of stone patients is recommended to ensure complete fragmentation and stone clearance. Plain radiography is suggested for the follow-up of radiopaque stones, with ultrasound and limited IVU reserved for the follow-up of radiolucent stones to minimize cumulative radiation exposure from repeated CT scans. Patients with asymptomatic calyceal stones who prefer an observational approach should have a yearly KUB to monitor progression of stone burden. Current research has been aimed toward the development of a micro-CT scan and coherent-scatter analysis to determine stone composition in vivo. This may have a significant impact on the future clinical management of renal calculi by facilitating selection of the most appropriate surgical intervention based on stone composition at the time of presentation.

[1]  J. Newton,et al.  Serial quantitative maternal nephrosonography in pregnancy. , 1985, The British journal of radiology.

[2]  M. Diament,et al.  Ultrasound and the diagnosis of renal and ureteral calculi. , 1986, The Journal of pediatrics.

[3]  R. Clayman,et al.  Comparison of endoscopic and radiological residual fragment rate following percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. , 1991, The Journal of urology.

[4]  D. Disalvo,et al.  Distal ureteral calculi: detection with vaginal US. , 1994, Radiology.

[5]  F. Regan,et al.  MR urography using HASTE imaging in the assessment of ureteric obstruction. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  R C Smith,et al.  Diagnosis of acute flank pain: value of unenhanced helical CT. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  J. Pahira,et al.  Radiation risk to the urologist during endourologic procedures, and a new shield that reduces exposure. , 1996, Urology.

[8]  S T Cochran,et al.  Percutaneous nephrostomy: placement under CT and fluoroscopy guidance. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  M. Gulati,et al.  Percutaneous nephrostomy with real-time sonographic guidance , 1997, Acta radiologica.

[10]  M. Hicks,et al.  A review of radiologically guided percutaneous nephrostomies in 303 patients. , 1997, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[11]  R. Smith,et al.  Ureteral calculi in patients with flank pain: correlation of plain radiography with unenhanced helical CT. , 1997, Radiology.

[12]  R C Smith,et al.  The value of unenhanced helical computerized tomography in the management of acute flank pain. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[13]  M. Gulati,et al.  Ultrasound‐guided percutaneous nephrostomy in non‐dilated pelvicaliceal system , 1998, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[14]  J. L. Pinto e Silva,et al.  Dilatation of the urinary tract during pregnancy: proposal of a curve of maximal caliceal diameter by gestational age. , 1998, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[15]  S. Yilmaz,et al.  Renal colic: comparison of spiral CT, US and IVU in the detection of ureteral calculi , 1999, European Radiology.

[16]  M. Pearle,et al.  Sensitivity of noncontrast helical computerized tomography and plain film radiography compared to flexible nephroscopy for detecting residual fragments after percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. , 1999, The Journal of urology.

[17]  J. Mullins,et al.  A comparison of noncontrast computerized tomography with excretory urography in the assessment of acute flank pain. , 1999, The Journal of urology.

[18]  S. Smith,et al.  The role of the plain radiograph and renal tract ultrasound in the management of children with renal tract calculi. , 2000, Clinical radiology.

[19]  S. Cox,et al.  Symptomatic Nephrolithiasis Complicating Pregnancy , 2000, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[20]  N. Buchholz,et al.  Three-Dimensional CT Scan Stone Reconstruction for the Planning of Percutaneous Surgery in a Morbidly Obese Patient , 2000, Urologia Internationalis.

[21]  D. Brenner,et al.  Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  O. Catalano,et al.  Suspected ureteral colic: primary helical CT versus selective helical CT after unenhanced radiography and sonography. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  F. Wawroschek,et al.  Low dose unenhanced helical computerized tomography for the evaluation of acute flank pain. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[24]  Keir A B Fowler,et al.  US for detecting renal calculi with nonenhanced CT as a reference standard. , 2002, Radiology.

[25]  T. Ripollés,et al.  Ureteral colic: US versus CT , 2004, Abdominal Imaging.

[26]  Cheng‐Yen Chang,et al.  Diagnostic Value of Unenhanced Computerized Tomography Urography in the Evaluation of Acute Renal Colic , 2003, The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences.

[27]  S. Gómez-Abril,et al.  The role of ultrasound in the diagnosis, management and evolutive prognosis of acute left-sided colonic diverticulitis: a review of 208 patients , 2003, European Radiology.

[28]  D. Assimos,et al.  Computerized tomography guided access for percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[29]  A. Oto,et al.  Comparison of spiral CT and US in the evaluation of pediatric urolithiasis. , 2004, JBR-BTR : organe de la Societe royale belge de radiologie (SRBR) = orgaan van de Koninklijke Belgische Vereniging voor Radiologie.

[30]  M. Gaeta,et al.  Combined magnetic resonance urography and targeted helical CT in patients with renal colic: A new approach to reduce delivered dose , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[31]  L. Khoo,et al.  Success and short-term complication rates of percutaneous nephrostomy during pregnancy. , 2004, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[32]  M. Weston,et al.  Percutaneous nephrostomy insertion: outcome data from a prospective multi-operator study at a UK training centre. , 2004, Clinical radiology.

[33]  K. Loughlin,et al.  Nephrolithiasis and pregnancy , 2004, Current opinion in urology.

[34]  James E Lingeman,et al.  Helical computed tomography accurately reports urinary stone composition using attenuation values: in vitro verification using high-resolution micro-computed tomography calibrated to fourier transform infrared microspectroscopy. , 2004, Urology.

[35]  J. Teichman Acute Renal Colic from Ureteral Calculus , 2004 .

[36]  S. Hosseini,et al.  Totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. , 2004, Journal of endourology.

[37]  T. Ripollés,et al.  Suspected ureteral colic: plain film and sonography vs unenhanced helical CT. A prospective study in 66 patients , 2004, European Radiology.

[38]  K. Ghani,et al.  Size matters: a survey of how urinary-tract stones are measured in the UK. , 2005, Journal of endourology.

[39]  D. Tolley,et al.  Contemporary Imaging for the Management of Urinary Stones , 2005 .

[40]  Patrik Rogalla,et al.  Does Ultra-Low-Dose CT With a Radiation Dose Equivalent to That of KUB Suffice to Detect Renal and Ureteral Calculi? , 2006, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[41]  Urinary stone disease: comparison of standard-dose and low-dose with 4D MDCT tube current modulation. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[42]  F. Klein,et al.  Low-dose computed tomography for the evaluation of flank pain in the pregnant population. , 2007, Journal of endourology.

[43]  J. Lysack,et al.  Correlation of CT scan versus plain radiography for measuring urinary stone dimensions. , 2007, The Canadian journal of urology.

[44]  J. Teichman,et al.  Shock wave lithotripsy correlates with stone density on preoperative computerized tomography. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[45]  Natalie N. Braun,et al.  Radiation exposure and pregnancy: when should we be concerned? , 2007, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[46]  C. Iselin,et al.  Low-dose versus standard-dose CT protocol in patients with clinically suspected renal colic. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[47]  I. Cunningham,et al.  POD-02.06: Coherent-scatter computed tomography of urinary calculi: a novel technique to identify mineral composition at stone core , 2007 .

[48]  T. Crook,et al.  Totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. , 2008, Journal of endourology.