Strength prediction of triaxially loaded composites using a progressive damage model based on micromechanics of failure

The research presented in this article is a continuation of the authors’ work in Part A of the second world-wide failure exercise (WWFE-II). In Part A, a constituent damage model based on micromechanics of failure was employed in order to predict the failure envelopes and stress–strain curves for unidirectional and laminated composites under multi-axial loadings. In this study, original predictions were compared with experimental data, supplied in Part B of the second world-wide failure exercise. Three modifications were made to the previous model: (a) a quadratic fiber failure criterion was proposed to replace the maximum longitudinal stress failure criterion used for fibers in the original model; (b) a three-dimensional kinking model was introduced so as to take into account the influence of the formation of kinking bands on micro stresses in the matrix, when a ply is under longitudinal compression; and (c) in-plane shear terms in stress amplification factors were averaged to avoid overestimation of local stress concentration for regions within the matrix and in the vicinity of the fiber–matrix interface. Questions regarding the discrepancies between the idealized and actual tests were also raised and are discussed in this study.

[1]  P. Soden,et al.  Recommendations for designers and researchers resulting from the world-wide failure exercise , 2003 .

[2]  D. C. Freeman,et al.  The Effects of Through-thickness Compression on the Interlaminar Shear Response of Laminated Fiber Composites , 2004 .

[3]  Sung Kyu Ha,et al.  Micro-Mechanics of Failure (MMF) for Continuous Fiber Reinforced Composites: , 2008 .

[4]  Yi Zhao TORQUE LIMIT FOR BOLTED JOINT FOR COMPOSITES PART A TTTC PROPERTIES OF LAMINATED COMPOSITES , 2003 .

[5]  P. D. Soden,et al.  A COMPARISON OF THE PREDICTIVE CAPABILITIES OF CURRENT FAILURE THEORIES FOR COMPOSITE LAMINATES, JUDGED AGAINST EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE , 2002 .

[6]  P. D. Soden,et al.  A further assessment of the predictive capabilities of current failure theories for composite laminates: comparison with experimental evidence , 2004 .

[7]  P. D. Soden,et al.  A comparison of the predictive capabilities of current failure theories for composite laminates: additional contributions , 2004 .

[8]  R. S. Raghava,et al.  The macroscopic yield behaviour of polymers , 1973 .

[9]  K. Jin,et al.  Distribution of Micro Stresses and Interfacial Tractions in Unidirectional Composites , 2008 .

[10]  Lei Xu,et al.  Prediction of three-dimensional composite laminate response using micromechanics of failure , 2012 .

[11]  Ferdinando Stassi-D'Alia,et al.  Flow and fracture of materials according to a new limiting condition of yelding , 1967 .

[12]  As Kaddour,et al.  Triaxial test results for fibre-reinforced composites: The Second World-Wide Failure Exercise benchmark data , 2013 .

[13]  Nobuo Takeda,et al.  Effect of interfacial adhesion and statistical fiber strength on tensile strength of unidirectional glass fiber/epoxy composites. Part I: experiment results , 2000 .

[14]  Lorenzo Iannucci,et al.  Physically-based failure models and criteria for laminated fibre-reinforced composites with emphasis on fibre kinking: Part I: Development , 2006 .

[15]  As Kaddour,et al.  Maturity of 3D failure criteria for fibre-reinforced composites: Comparison between theories and experiments: Part B of WWFE-II , 2013 .

[16]  Anthony M. Waas,et al.  Compressive failure of composites, part I: Testing and micromechanical theories , 1996 .

[17]  As Kaddour,et al.  Input data for test cases used in benchmarking triaxial failure theories of composites , 2012 .