People recognize and condone their own morally motivated reasoning

[1]  Corey J. Cusimano,et al.  Reconciling scientific and commonsense values to improve reasoning , 2021, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  Corey J. Cusimano,et al.  Morality justifies motivated reasoning in the folk ethics of belief , 2020, Cognition.

[3]  Corey J. Cusimano,et al.  People judge others to have more voluntary control over beliefs than they themselves do. , 2020, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  T. Lombrozo,et al.  When and why people think beliefs are “debunked” by scientific explanations of their origins , 2019, Mind & Language.

[5]  Rima Basu Radical moral encroachment: The moral stakes of racist beliefs , 2019, Philosophical Issues.

[6]  J. Baron,et al.  False Equivalence: Are Liberals and Conservatives in the United States Equally Biased? , 2019, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[7]  Joel J. van der Weele,et al.  Deception and self-deception , 2019, Nature Human Behaviour.

[8]  M. Banaji,et al.  People Make the Same Bayesian Judgment They Criticize in Others , 2018, Psychological science.

[9]  Corey J. Cusimano,et al.  Lay beliefs about the controllability of everyday mental states. , 2018, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[10]  Sarah Moss,et al.  On Probabilistic Knowledge , 2019 .

[11]  L. Ross From the Fundamental Attribution Error to the Truly Fundamental Attribution Error and Beyond: My Research Journey , 2018, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[12]  Rima Basu The wrongs of racist beliefs , 2018, Philosophical Studies.

[13]  Deena Skolnick Weisberg,et al.  Non-Scientific Criteria for Belief Sustain Counter-Scientific Beliefs , 2018, Cogn. Sci..

[14]  Renée Jorgensen Bolinger The rational impermissibility of accepting (some) racial generalizations , 2018, Synthese.

[15]  Georgi Gardiner Evidentialism and Moral Encroachment , 2018 .

[16]  Jane L. Risen,et al.  The Empirical Case for Acquiescing to Intuition , 2017, Psychological science.

[17]  D. Moore,et al.  The Belief in a Favorable Future , 2014, Psychological science.

[18]  M. S. Hershcovisa,et al.  Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 2017 .

[19]  Jane L. Risen Believing what we do not believe: Acquiescence to superstitious beliefs and other powerful intuitions. , 2016, Psychological review.

[20]  Edward B. Royzman,et al.  The curious tale of Julie and Mark: Unraveling the moral dumbfounding effect , 2015, Judgment and Decision Making.

[21]  Elizabeth R. Tenney,et al.  (Too) optimistic about optimism: the belief that optimism improves performance. , 2015, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  Charles Kemp,et al.  Belief polarization is not always irrational. , 2014, Psychological review.

[23]  Alexander Todorov,et al.  People Claim Objectivity After Knowingly Using Biased Strategies , 2014, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[24]  Geoffrey P. Goodwin,et al.  Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation. , 2014, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Cognitive sophistication does not attenuate the bias blind spot. , 2012, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  A. D. de Vries,et al.  Puberty Suppression in Adolescents With Gender Identity Disorder: A Prospective Follow-Up Study: Puberty Suppression in Adolescents With GID , 2010 .

[27]  R. Trivers,et al.  The evolution and psychology of self-deception. , 2011, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[28]  Katherine L. Milkman,et al.  How Can Decision Making Be Improved? , 2009, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[29]  E. Pronin,et al.  When Disagreement Gets Ugly: Perceptions of Bias and the Escalation of Conflict , 2008, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[30]  J. Baron Thinking and deciding, 4th ed. , 2008 .

[31]  Adam Kowol The theory of cognitive dissonance By , 2008 .

[32]  E. Pronin,et al.  Perception and misperception of bias in human judgment , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[33]  C. Frantz,et al.  I AM Being Fair: The Bias Blind Spot as a Stumbling Block to Seeing Both Sides , 2006 .

[34]  Michael J. A. Wohl,et al.  On Attributing Negative Motives to Others Who Disagree With Our Opinions , 2005, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[35]  G. Carlo,et al.  Identity as a Source of Moral Motivation , 2005, Human Development.

[36]  Thomas Gilovich,et al.  Peering Into the Bias Blind Spot: People’s Assessments of Bias in Themselves and Others , 2005, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[37]  L. Ross,et al.  Objectivity in the eye of the beholder: divergent perceptions of bias in self versus others. , 2004, Psychological review.

[38]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Social functionalist frameworks for judgment and choice: intuitive politicians, theologians, and prosecutors. , 2002, Psychological review.

[39]  L. Ross,et al.  The Bias Blind Spot: Perceptions of Bias in Self Versus Others , 2002 .

[40]  P. Tetlock,et al.  The psychology of the unthinkable: taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[41]  C. Mok,et al.  A study of factors affecting tip size in restaurants. , 1999 .

[42]  Jonathan Baron,et al.  Regular ArticleProtected Values , 1997 .

[43]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  A disconfirmation bias in the evaluation of arguments. , 1996 .

[44]  Michael Lynn,et al.  Tipping: an Incentive/Reward for Service? , 1996 .

[45]  A. Kruglanski Motivated social cognition: Principles of the interface. , 1996 .

[46]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Social hypothesis testing: Cognitive and motivational mechanisms. , 1996 .

[47]  L. Ross,et al.  Naive realism in everyday life: Implications for social conflict and misunderstanding. , 1996 .

[48]  L. Ross,et al.  Actual versus assumed differences in construal: 'naive realism' in intergroup perception and conflict , 1995 .

[49]  Roy F. Baumeister,et al.  Self-Regulation of Cognitive Inference and Decision Processes , 1994 .

[50]  J. Koehler The Influence of Prior Beliefs on Scientific Judgments of Evidence Quality , 1993 .

[51]  Peter H. Ditto,et al.  Motivated Skepticism: Use of Differential Decision Criteria for Preferred and Nonpreferred Conclusions , 1992 .

[52]  T. Gilovich,et al.  How We Know What Isn't So: The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life , 1991 .

[53]  Z. Kunda,et al.  The case for motivated reasoning. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[54]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Toward an integration of cognitive and motivational perspectives on social inference: A biased hypothesis-testing model , 1987 .

[55]  Anthony Appiah The Uncompleted Argument: Du Bois and the Illusion of Race , 1985, Critical Inquiry.

[56]  A. Blasi,et al.  Bridging Moral Cognition and Moral Action: A Critical Review of the Literature. , 1980 .

[57]  L. Ross,et al.  Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence , 1979 .

[58]  Kathleen C. Gerbasi,et al.  Short, homogeneous versions of the Marlow‐Crowne Social Desirability Scale , 1972 .