People recognize and condone their own morally motivated reasoning
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Corey J. Cusimano,et al. Reconciling scientific and commonsense values to improve reasoning , 2021, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[2] Corey J. Cusimano,et al. Morality justifies motivated reasoning in the folk ethics of belief , 2020, Cognition.
[3] Corey J. Cusimano,et al. People judge others to have more voluntary control over beliefs than they themselves do. , 2020, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[4] T. Lombrozo,et al. When and why people think beliefs are “debunked” by scientific explanations of their origins , 2019, Mind & Language.
[5] Rima Basu. Radical moral encroachment: The moral stakes of racist beliefs , 2019, Philosophical Issues.
[6] J. Baron,et al. False Equivalence: Are Liberals and Conservatives in the United States Equally Biased? , 2019, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[7] Joel J. van der Weele,et al. Deception and self-deception , 2019, Nature Human Behaviour.
[8] M. Banaji,et al. People Make the Same Bayesian Judgment They Criticize in Others , 2018, Psychological science.
[9] Corey J. Cusimano,et al. Lay beliefs about the controllability of everyday mental states. , 2018, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[10] Sarah Moss,et al. On Probabilistic Knowledge , 2019 .
[11] L. Ross. From the Fundamental Attribution Error to the Truly Fundamental Attribution Error and Beyond: My Research Journey , 2018, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[12] Rima Basu. The wrongs of racist beliefs , 2018, Philosophical Studies.
[13] Deena Skolnick Weisberg,et al. Non-Scientific Criteria for Belief Sustain Counter-Scientific Beliefs , 2018, Cogn. Sci..
[14] Renée Jorgensen Bolinger. The rational impermissibility of accepting (some) racial generalizations , 2018, Synthese.
[15] Georgi Gardiner. Evidentialism and Moral Encroachment , 2018 .
[16] Jane L. Risen,et al. The Empirical Case for Acquiescing to Intuition , 2017, Psychological science.
[17] D. Moore,et al. The Belief in a Favorable Future , 2014, Psychological science.
[18] M. S. Hershcovisa,et al. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 2017 .
[19] Jane L. Risen. Believing what we do not believe: Acquiescence to superstitious beliefs and other powerful intuitions. , 2016, Psychological review.
[20] Edward B. Royzman,et al. The curious tale of Julie and Mark: Unraveling the moral dumbfounding effect , 2015, Judgment and Decision Making.
[21] Elizabeth R. Tenney,et al. (Too) optimistic about optimism: the belief that optimism improves performance. , 2015, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[22] Charles Kemp,et al. Belief polarization is not always irrational. , 2014, Psychological review.
[23] Alexander Todorov,et al. People Claim Objectivity After Knowingly Using Biased Strategies , 2014, Personality & social psychology bulletin.
[24] Geoffrey P. Goodwin,et al. Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation. , 2014, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[25] K. Stanovich,et al. Cognitive sophistication does not attenuate the bias blind spot. , 2012, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[26] A. D. de Vries,et al. Puberty Suppression in Adolescents With Gender Identity Disorder: A Prospective Follow-Up Study: Puberty Suppression in Adolescents With GID , 2010 .
[27] R. Trivers,et al. The evolution and psychology of self-deception. , 2011, The Behavioral and brain sciences.
[28] Katherine L. Milkman,et al. How Can Decision Making Be Improved? , 2009, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[29] E. Pronin,et al. When Disagreement Gets Ugly: Perceptions of Bias and the Escalation of Conflict , 2008, Personality & social psychology bulletin.
[30] J. Baron. Thinking and deciding, 4th ed. , 2008 .
[31] Adam Kowol. The theory of cognitive dissonance By , 2008 .
[32] E. Pronin,et al. Perception and misperception of bias in human judgment , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[33] C. Frantz,et al. I AM Being Fair: The Bias Blind Spot as a Stumbling Block to Seeing Both Sides , 2006 .
[34] Michael J. A. Wohl,et al. On Attributing Negative Motives to Others Who Disagree With Our Opinions , 2005, Personality & social psychology bulletin.
[35] G. Carlo,et al. Identity as a Source of Moral Motivation , 2005, Human Development.
[36] Thomas Gilovich,et al. Peering Into the Bias Blind Spot: People’s Assessments of Bias in Themselves and Others , 2005, Personality & social psychology bulletin.
[37] L. Ross,et al. Objectivity in the eye of the beholder: divergent perceptions of bias in self versus others. , 2004, Psychological review.
[38] P. Tetlock,et al. Social functionalist frameworks for judgment and choice: intuitive politicians, theologians, and prosecutors. , 2002, Psychological review.
[39] L. Ross,et al. The Bias Blind Spot: Perceptions of Bias in Self Versus Others , 2002 .
[40] P. Tetlock,et al. The psychology of the unthinkable: taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[41] C. Mok,et al. A study of factors affecting tip size in restaurants. , 1999 .
[42] Jonathan Baron,et al. Regular ArticleProtected Values , 1997 .
[43] Edward E. Smith,et al. A disconfirmation bias in the evaluation of arguments. , 1996 .
[44] Michael Lynn,et al. Tipping: an Incentive/Reward for Service? , 1996 .
[45] A. Kruglanski. Motivated social cognition: Principles of the interface. , 1996 .
[46] Yaacov Trope,et al. Social hypothesis testing: Cognitive and motivational mechanisms. , 1996 .
[47] L. Ross,et al. Naive realism in everyday life: Implications for social conflict and misunderstanding. , 1996 .
[48] L. Ross,et al. Actual versus assumed differences in construal: 'naive realism' in intergroup perception and conflict , 1995 .
[49] Roy F. Baumeister,et al. Self-Regulation of Cognitive Inference and Decision Processes , 1994 .
[50] J. Koehler. The Influence of Prior Beliefs on Scientific Judgments of Evidence Quality , 1993 .
[51] Peter H. Ditto,et al. Motivated Skepticism: Use of Differential Decision Criteria for Preferred and Nonpreferred Conclusions , 1992 .
[52] T. Gilovich,et al. How We Know What Isn't So: The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life , 1991 .
[53] Z. Kunda,et al. The case for motivated reasoning. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.
[54] J. Greenberg,et al. Toward an integration of cognitive and motivational perspectives on social inference: A biased hypothesis-testing model , 1987 .
[55] Anthony Appiah. The Uncompleted Argument: Du Bois and the Illusion of Race , 1985, Critical Inquiry.
[56] A. Blasi,et al. Bridging Moral Cognition and Moral Action: A Critical Review of the Literature. , 1980 .
[57] L. Ross,et al. Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence , 1979 .
[58] Kathleen C. Gerbasi,et al. Short, homogeneous versions of the Marlow‐Crowne Social Desirability Scale , 1972 .