Science Teacher Educators’ Engagement with Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Scientific Inquiry in Predominantly Paper-Based Distance Learning Programs

This article focuses on the dilemmas science educators face when having to introduce Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) to science student teachers in a predominantly paper-based distance learning environment. It draws on the premise that science education is bound by the Nature of Science (NOS), and by the Nature of Scientific Inquiry (NOSI). Furthermore, science educators’ own PCK, and the limitations of a predominantly paper-based distance education (DE) model of delivery are challenges that they have to face when introducing PCK and authentic inquiry-based learning experiences. It deprives them and their students from optimal engagement in a science-oriented community of practice, and leaves little opportunity to establish flourishing communities of inquiry. This study carried out a contextual analysis of the tutorial material to assess the PCK that the student teachers had been exposed to. This comprised the ideas of a community of inquiry, a community of science, the conceptualization of PCK, scientific inquiry, and the 5E Instructional Model of the Biological Sciences Curriculum Study. The analysis confirmed that the lecturers had a good understanding of NOS, NOSI and science process skills, but found it difficult to design interventions to optimize the PCK development of students through communities of inquiry. Paper-based tutorials are ideal to share theory, policies and practices, but fail to monitor the engagement of learners in communities of inquiry. The article concludes with a number of suggestions to address the apparent lack of impact power of the paper-based mode of delivery, specifically in relation to inquiry-based teaching and learning (IBTL).

[1]  D. Bob Gowin,et al.  Science, Curriculum, and Liberal Education: Selected Essays , 1978 .

[2]  Thomas R. Koballa,et al.  Science Instruction in the Middle and Secondary Schools: Developing Fundamental Knowledge and Skills , 2005 .

[3]  L. Shulman Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching , 1986 .

[4]  L. Shulman Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform , 1987 .

[5]  J. Wellington Skills and processes in science education : a critical analysis , 1989 .

[6]  R. Slavin Research on Cooperative Learning: Consensus and Controversy. , 1990 .

[7]  Norman G. Lederman Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research , 1992 .

[8]  R. Chambers The Origins and Practice of Participatory Rural Appraisal * ROBERT CHAMBERS ? , 1994 .

[9]  R. Chambers Participatory rural appraisal (PRA): Challenges, potentials and paradigm , 1994 .

[10]  J. Tuovinen,et al.  A comparison of cognitive load associated with discovery learning and worked examples , 1999 .

[11]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. , 2000, Ergonomics.

[12]  M. Byrne,et al.  Hermeneutics as a methodology for textual analysis. , 2001, AORN journal.

[13]  Judith K. Franzak Developing a Teacher Identity: The Impact of Critical Friends Practice on the Student Teacher , 2002 .

[14]  Geoffrey Rockwell,et al.  What is Text Analysis, Really? , 2003, Lit. Linguistic Comput..

[15]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry , 2004 .

[16]  Margaret J.A. Edwards,et al.  Exemplary Online Educators: Creating a Community of Inquiry , 2005 .

[17]  Rjoè,et al.  Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work , 2005 .

[18]  Lara K. Smetana,et al.  Simplifying Inquiry Instruction: Assessing the Inquiry Level of Classroom Activities , 2005 .

[19]  Von Maltzahn,et al.  A critical reflection on participatory methods as an alternative mode of enquiry , 2006 .

[20]  David R. Thomas,et al.  A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data , 2006 .

[21]  R. Bybee,et al.  The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Origins and Effectiveness , 2006 .

[22]  Nico Verloop,et al.  The Portfolio as a Tool for Stimulating Reflection by Student Teachers. , 2007 .

[23]  Maria do Carmo Querido Avelar,et al.  [Teaching scientific investigation methods at a private university]. , 2007, Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P.

[24]  D. Garrison,et al.  Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions , 2007, Internet High. Educ..

[25]  T. Evans International Handbook of Distance Education , 2008 .

[26]  Ronél Ferreira Using Intervention Research to Facilitate Community-Based Coping with HIV&AIDS , 2008 .

[27]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  An Instrument To Assess Views Of Scientific Inquiry: The VOSI Questionnaire , 2008 .

[28]  Glenn A. Bowen Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method , 2009 .

[29]  Sombat Tayraukham,et al.  Effects of 7-E, KWL and Conventional Instruction on Analytical Thinking, Learning Achievement and Attitudes toward Chemistry Learning , 2009 .

[30]  J. Marshall,et al.  4E × 2 Instructional Model: Uniting Three Learning Constructs to Improve Praxis in Science and Mathematics Classrooms , 2009 .

[31]  Terry Poulton,et al.  The replacement of ‘paper’ cases by interactive online virtual patients in problem-based learning , 2009, Medical teacher.

[32]  Abigail Jurist Levy,et al.  Inquiry-based science instruction—what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002 , 2010 .

[33]  P. Prinsloo,et al.  Revisiting the five generations of distance education : Quo vadis? , 2010 .

[34]  Amanda Berry,et al.  Constructing CoRes—a Strategy for Building PCK in Pre-service Science Teacher Education , 2011 .

[35]  M. Pedaste,et al.  How to determine the quality of students’ reflections? , 2012 .

[36]  J. M. V. Zyl,et al.  Effect of Contact Class Attendance on the Academic Success of Open Distance Learning Students in Advanced Certificate in Education Programs , 2012 .

[37]  ‘CoRes and PaP-eRs as a strategy for helping beginning primary teachers develop their pedagogical content knowledge , 2014 .

[38]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Knowledge about Inquiry: A study in South African high schools , 2014 .

[39]  K. Taber Understanding and developing science teachers’ pedagogic content knowledge , 2014 .

[40]  S. Howie,et al.  Do prospective mathematics teachers teach who they say they are? , 2014 .

[41]  S. Elo,et al.  Qualitative Content Analysis , 2014 .

[42]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Meaningful assessment of learners' understandings about scientific inquiry—The views about scientific inquiry (VASI) questionnaire , 2014 .

[43]  Laura Czerniewicz,et al.  Position Paper: MOOCs , 2015 .

[44]  W. Fraser,et al.  STUDENT TEACHERS AS RESEARCHERS: DEVELOPING TEACHER IDENTITIES IN A COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE , 2015 .

[45]  Ademola Johnson Adewara,et al.  New Technologies and Science Teachers Education within the Context of Distance Learning: A Case Study for the University of Lagos. , 2015 .

[46]  Thomas Hülsmann,et al.  Workload and interaction: Unisa’s signature courses – a design template for transitioning to online DE? , 2016 .

[47]  B. N. Koul,et al.  Unit-7 Guided Didactic Conversation in Distance Education , 2017 .

[48]  D. Garrison ONLINE COMMUNITY OF INQUIRY REVIEW: SOCIAL, COGNITIVE, AND TEACHING PRESENCE ISSUES , 2019, Online Learning.