Probability of fixation of an advantageous mutant in a viral quasispecies.

The probability that an advantageous mutant rises to fixation in a viral quasispecies is investigated in the framework of multitype branching processes. Whether fixation is possible depends on the overall growth rate of the quasispecies that will form if invasion is successful rather than on the individual fitness of the invading mutant. The exact fixation probability can be calculated only if the fitnesses of all potential members of the invading quasispecies are known. Quasispecies fixation has two important characteristics: First, a sequence with negative selection coefficient has a positive fixation probability as long as it has the potential to grow into a quasispecies with an overall growth rate that exceeds that of the established quasispecies. Second, the fixation probabilities of sequences with identical fitnesses can nevertheless vary over many orders of magnitudes. Two approximations for the probability of fixation are introduced. Both approximations require only partial knowledge about the potential members of the invading quasispecies. The performance of these two approximations is compared to the exact fixation probability on a network of RNA sequences with identical secondary structure.

[1]  S. Elena,et al.  Clonal interference and the evolution of RNA viruses. , 1999, Science.

[2]  Richard S. Varga,et al.  Matrix Iterative Analysis , 2000, The Mathematical Gazette.

[3]  E. Domingo,et al.  RNA virus mutations and fitness for survival. , 1997, Annual review of microbiology.

[4]  C. Ofria,et al.  Evolution of digital organisms at high mutation rates leads to survival of the flattest , 2001, Nature.

[5]  T. E. Harris,et al.  The Theory of Branching Processes. , 1963 .

[6]  J. Gillis,et al.  Matrix Iterative Analysis , 1961 .

[7]  C. Biebricher,et al.  Sequence analysis of RNA species synthesized by Q beta replicase without template. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[8]  E. Domingo,et al.  Quasispecies Theory in Virology , 2002, Journal of Virology.

[9]  T. Johnson,et al.  The effect of deleterious alleles on adaptation in asexual populations. , 2002, Genetics.

[10]  L. Chao,et al.  Evolvability of an RNA virus is determined by its mutational neighbourhood , 2000, Nature.

[11]  S. Elena,et al.  Diminishing Returns of Population Size in the Rate of RNA Virus Adaptation , 2000, Journal of Virology.

[12]  Y. Svirezhev,et al.  Diffusion Models of Population Genetics , 1990 .

[13]  E. Pollak.  Fixation probabilities when the population size undergoes cyclic fluctuations. , 2000, Theoretical population biology.

[14]  W. Ewens.  THE PROBABILITY OF FIXATION OF A MUTANT: THE TWO‐LOCUS CASE , 1967, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[15]  C. Wilke.  SELECTION FOR FITNESS VERSUS SELECTION FOR ROBUSTNESS IN RNA SECONDARY STRUCTURE FOLDING , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[16]  J. Holland,et al.  Extreme heterogeneity in populations of vesicular stomatitis virus , 1989, Journal of virology.

[17]  E. Bornberg-Bauer,et al.  How are model protein structures distributed in sequence space? , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[18]  M. Huynen,et al.  Neutral evolution of mutational robustness. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Claus O. Wilke,et al.  Adaptive evolution on neutral networks , 2001, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[20]  I. Roninson,et al.  Correlation between amount of virus with altered nucleotide sequence and the monkey test for acceptability of oral poliovirus vaccine. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Motoo Kimura,et al.  Some Problems of Stochastic Processes in Genetics , 1957 .

[22]  R. A. Fisher,et al.  On the dominance ratio , 1990 .

[23]  M. Kimura,et al.  The length of time required for a selectively neutral mutant to reach fixation through random frequency drift in a finite population. , 1970, Genetical research.

[24]  J. Holland,et al.  RNA virus quasispecies populations can suppress vastly superior mutant progeny , 1990, Journal of virology.

[25]  J. L. King,et al.  Fixation of a deleterious allele at one of two "duplicate" loci by mutation pressure and random drift. , 1979, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  R. Lenski,et al.  Test of synergistic interactions among deleterious mutations in bacteria , 1997, Nature.

[27]  Charles Weissmann,et al.  Nucleotide sequence heterogeneity of an RNA phage population , 1978, Cell.

[28]  J. Drake,et al.  Mutation rates among RNA viruses. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  N. Barton.  Linkage and the limits to natural selection. , 1995, Genetics.

[30]  D. Krakauer,et al.  Redundancy, antiredundancy, and the robustness of genomes , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  R. Lenski,et al.  Diminishing returns from mutation supply rate in asexual populations. , 1999, Science.

[32]  Edward C. Holmes,et al.  Is the Quasispecies Concept Relevant to RNA Viruses? , 2002, Journal of Virology.

[33]  Rory A. Fisher,et al.  XVII—The distribution of gene ratios for rare mutations , 1931 .

[34]  J. C. de la Torre,et al.  Suppression of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus--induced growth hormone deficiency syndrome by disease-negative virus variants. , 1996, Virology.

[35]  R. Lenski,et al.  The fate of competing beneficial mutations in an asexual population , 2004, Genetica.

[36]  Mandy J. Haldane,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Natural and Artificial Selection, Part V: Selection and Mutation , 1927, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[37]  P. Schuster,et al.  Stationary mutant distributions and evolutionary optimization. , 1988, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[38]  M. Huynen,et al.  Smoothness within ruggedness: the role of neutrality in adaptation. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  Motoo Kimura,et al.  Diffusion models in population genetics , 1964, Journal of Applied Probability.

[40]  E. Domingo,et al.  In vitro site-directed mutagenesis: Generation and properties of an infectious extracistronic mutant of bacteriophage Qβ , 1976 .

[41]  Josef Hofbauer,et al.  The theory of evolution and dynamical systems , 1988 .

[42]  M A Nowak,et al.  What is a quasispecies? , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[43]  J. Drake.  Rates of spontaneous mutation among RNA viruses. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  Katherine Spindler,et al.  Rapid evolution of RNA genomes. , 1982, Science.

[45]  Joachim Hermisson,et al.  Mutation-selection balance: ancestry, load, and maximum principle. , 2002, Theoretical population biology.

[46]  N. Barton,et al.  The evolution of recombination: removing the limits to natural selection. , 1997, Genetics.

[47]  E. Holmes,et al.  Evidence for the non-quasispecies evolution of RNA viruses [corrected]. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.

[48]  W. Ewens,et al.  Fixation probabilities of additive alleles in diploid populations , 1995 .

[49]  M. Eigen,et al.  The Hypercycle: A principle of natural self-organization , 2009 .

[50]  K Sigmund,et al.  Polynucleotide evolution and branching processes , 1985, Bulletin of mathematical biology.