Help or Hinder? When Recommendation Signage Expands Consideration Sets and Heightens Decision Difficulty

This research examines whether recommendation signage helps or hinders the consumer when faced with choosing from large product assortments. In spite of frequent usage and retailer intuition suggesting that providing recommendation signs (e.g., “Best Seller,” “Award Winner”) should help consumers in the choice process, we propose that signs can hinder choice for consumers with more developed preferences by adding to the complexity and difficulty of the decision process. In three experiments using horizontally differentiated products in multiple categories, we provide evidence that recommendation signs create preference conflict for consumers with more developed preferences, leading these consumers to form larger consideration sets and ultimately experience more difficulty from the decision-making process. In addition, we show that these effects are mitigated for consumers with less developed preferences and when the choice is from a small assortment. The results suggest that recommendation signage may not be an effective tool for aiding choice from large assortments; instead signage can exacerbate the difficulties associated with having too many choices, with implications on purchase quantity.

[1]  L. McAlister A dynamic attribute satiation model of variety seeking behavior , 2011 .

[2]  U. Böckenholt,et al.  Commentary on Scheibehenne, Greifeneder, and Todd Choice Overload: Is There Anything to It? , 2010 .

[3]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Leveraging Missing Ratings to Improve Online Recommendation Systems , 2006 .

[4]  G. McClelland,et al.  Misleading Heuristics and Moderated Multiple Regression Models , 2001 .

[5]  Rebecca K. Ratner,et al.  Choosing less-preferred experiences for the sake of variety. , 1999 .

[6]  A. Chernev When More Is Less and Less Is More: the Role of Ideal Point Availability and Assortment in Consumer Choice This Research Argues That Choices from Different Size Assort- Ments Are a Function of the Degree to Which Consumers Have , 2022 .

[7]  Gary H. McClelland,et al.  Nasty data: Unruly, ill-mannered observations can ruin your analysis. , 2000 .

[8]  Rebecca K. Ratner,et al.  How subjective grouping of options influences choice and allocation: diversification bias and the phenomenon of partition dependence. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[9]  Kristin Diehl,et al.  When Two Rights Make a Wrong: Searching Too Much in Ordered Environments , 2005 .

[10]  Simona Botti,et al.  Power and Choice , 2011, Psychological science.

[11]  D. Moore,et al.  Effects of Task Difficulty on Use of Advice , 2007 .

[12]  K. Diehl,et al.  Great Expectations?! Assortment Size, Expectations, and Satisfaction , 2008 .

[13]  S. Bonaccio,et al.  Advice taking and decision-making: An integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciences , 2006 .

[14]  Susan M. Broniarczyk,et al.  Integrating Multiple Opinions: The Role of Aspiration Level on Consumer Response to Critic Consensus , 1998 .

[15]  Donna L. Hoffman,et al.  The Revolution Will Not Be Televised: Introduction to the Special Issue on Marketing Science and the Internet , 2000 .

[16]  Marcel Zeelenberg,et al.  Option Attachment: When Deliberating Makes Choosing Feel Like Losing. , 2003 .

[17]  Selin A. Malkoc,et al.  Choosing Here and Now vs. There and Later: The Moderating Role of Psychological Distance on Assortment Size Preferences , 2012 .

[18]  Andrew D. Gershoff,et al.  Recommendation or Evaluation? Task Sensitivity in Information Source Selection , 2001 .

[19]  On Amir,et al.  Choice Construction versus Preference Construction: The Instability of Preferences Learned in Context , 2007 .

[20]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives , 1986 .

[21]  John W. Payne,et al.  Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis☆ , 1976 .

[22]  Yaniv,et al.  Advice Taking in Decision Making: Egocentric Discounting and Reputation Formation. , 2000, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[23]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Reactance to Recommendations: When Unsolicited Advice Yields Contrary Responses , 2004 .

[24]  A. Sela,et al.  Variety, Vice, and Virtue: How Assortment Size Influences Option Choice , 2008 .

[25]  J. Brehm,et al.  Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control , 1981 .

[26]  M. Lepper,et al.  The Construction of Preference: When Choice Is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing? , 2006 .

[27]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[28]  Rebecca Walker Reczek,et al.  Seeing Ourselves in Others: Reviewer Ambiguity, Egocentric Anchoring, and Persuasion , 2011 .

[29]  S. Iyengar,et al.  The Mere Categorization Effect: How the Presence of Categories Increases Choosers' Perceptions of Assortment Variety and Outcome Satisfaction , 2008 .

[30]  Valerie J. Trifts,et al.  Consumer Decision Making in Online Shopping Environments: The Effects of Interactive Decision Aids , 2000 .

[31]  D. Rubin,et al.  Contrasts and Effect Sizes in Behavioral Research: A Correlational Approach , 1999 .

[32]  Wayne D. Hoyer,et al.  Consumers’ Perceptions of the Assortment Offered in a Grocery Category: The Impact of Item Reduction , 1998 .

[33]  D. Rubin,et al.  Contrasts and Effect Sizes in Behavioral Research , 1999 .

[34]  Dan Ariely,et al.  Path dependent preferences: The role of early experience and biased search in preference development , 2006 .

[35]  A. A. Mitchell,et al.  The Assessment of Alternative Measures of Consumer Expertise , 1996 .

[36]  Steven M. Shugan The Cost Of Thinking , 1980 .

[37]  I. Simonson,et al.  The Influence of Product Variety on Brand Perception and Choice , 2006 .

[38]  S. Iyengar,et al.  The Dark Side of Choice: When Choice Impairs Social Welfare , 2006 .

[39]  J. Payne,et al.  Product category familiarity and preference construction , 1998 .

[40]  A. Chernev Product Assortment and Individual Decision Processes , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[41]  T. Oum,et al.  Determinant Attributes in Retail Patronage: Seasonal, Temporal, Regional, and International Comparisons , 1983 .

[42]  B. Schwartz The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less , 2004 .

[43]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choice under Conflict: The Dynamics of Deferred Decision , 1992 .

[44]  A. Chernev Decision Focus and Consumer Choice Among Assortments , 2006 .

[45]  I. Simonson The Effect of Purchase Quantity and Timing on Variety-Seeking Behavior , 1990 .

[46]  P. Todd,et al.  Can There Ever Be Too Many Options? A Meta-Analytic Review of Choice Overload , 2010 .

[47]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The adaptive decision maker , 1993 .

[48]  D. Ariely,et al.  Constructing Stable Preferences: A Look Into Dimensions of Experience and Their Impact on Preference Stability , 1999 .

[49]  J. Redden,et al.  Reducing Satiation: The Role of Categorization Level , 2008 .

[50]  J. Edward Russo,et al.  Binary choice under instructions to select versus reject , 2004 .

[51]  B. Kahn,et al.  Variety for sale: Mass customization or mass confusion? , 1998 .

[52]  C. Anderson The Psychology of Doing Nothing: Forms of Decision Avoidance Result from Reason and Emotion , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[53]  B. Kahn,et al.  Modeling choice among assortments. , 1991 .