Trace but not delay fear conditioning requires attention and the anterior cingulate cortex

Higher cognitive functions such as attention have been difficult to model in genetically tractable organisms. In humans, attention-distracting stimuli interfere with trace but not delay conditioning, two forms of associative learning. Attention has also been correlated with activation of anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), but its functional significance is unclear. Here we show that a visual distractor interferes selectively with trace but not delay auditory fear conditioning in mice. Trace conditioning is associated with increased neuronal activity in ACC, as assayed by relative levels of c-fos expression, and is selectively impaired by lesions of this structure. The effects of the ACC lesions are unlikely to be caused by indirect impairment of the hippocampus, which is required for mnemonic aspects of trace conditioning. These data suggest that trace conditioning may be useful for studying neural substrates of attention in mice, and implicate the ACC as one such substrate.

[1]  David J. Anderson,et al.  Neural Correlates of Competing Fear Behaviors Evoked by an Innately Aversive Stimulus , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  Joel L. Davis,et al.  Visual attention and cortical circuits , 2001 .

[3]  G. Paxinos The Rat nervous system , 1985 .

[4]  R. Radcliffe,et al.  Contextual and cued fear conditioning in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice: context discrimination and the effects of retention interval. , 2002, Behavioral neuroscience.

[5]  R. Clark,et al.  Classical conditioning, awareness, and brain systems , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  M. Fanselow,et al.  Post‐training excitotoxic lesions of the dorsal hippocampus attenuate forward trace, backward trace, and delay fear conditioning in a temporally specific manner , 2002, Hippocampus.

[7]  J. Dostrovsky,et al.  Human anterior cingulate cortex neurons modulated by attention-demanding tasks. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Hippocampus and trace conditioning of the rabbit's classically conditioned nictitating membrane response. , 1986, Behavioral neuroscience.

[9]  C. Koch,et al.  Working memory and fear conditioning , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  J. Muir,et al.  The cerebral cortex of the rat and visual attentional function: dissociable effects of mediofrontal, cingulate, anterior dorsolateral, and parietal cortex lesions on a five-choice serial reaction time task. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[11]  R. Clark,et al.  Awareness predicts the magnitude of single‐cue trace eyeblink conditioning , 2000, Hippocampus.

[12]  T. Bussey,et al.  Triple dissociation of anterior cingulate, posterior cingulate, and medial frontal cortices on visual discrimination tasks using a touchscreen testing procedure for the rat. , 1997, Behavioral neuroscience.

[13]  R. Clark,et al.  Parallel acquisition of awareness and trace eyeblink classical conditioning. , 2000, Learning & memory.

[14]  E. Kang,et al.  Hippocampal modulation of cingulo‐thalamic neuronal activity and discriminative avoidance learning in rabbits , 1998, Hippocampus.

[15]  B. Vogt,et al.  Contributions of anterior cingulate cortex to behaviour. , 1995, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[16]  R. Clark,et al.  Classical conditioning and brain systems: the role of awareness. , 1998, Science.

[17]  J. Disterhoft,et al.  Cortical involvement in acquisition and extinction of trace eyeblink conditioning. , 2000, Behavioral neuroscience.

[18]  J. Disterhoft,et al.  Neurotoxic lesions of the dorsal hippocampus disrupt auditory‐cued trace heart rate (fear) conditioning in rabbits , 2000, Hippocampus.

[19]  J. Disterhoft,et al.  Hippocampectomy disrupts auditory trace fear conditioning and contextual fear conditioning in the rat , 1999, Hippocampus.

[20]  Trevor W. Robbins,et al.  Dissociable effects of anterior and posterior cingulate cortex lesions on the acquisition of a conditional visual discrimination: Facilitation of early learning vs. impairment of late learning , 1996, Behavioural Brain Research.

[21]  M. Fanselow,et al.  Modality-specific retrograde amnesia of fear. , 1992, Science.

[22]  George Paxinos,et al.  The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates , 2001 .

[23]  S. Khariwala,et al.  Tonotopic mapping of c-fos expression in the dorsal cochlear nucleus of the hamster , 2001 .

[24]  Standard delay eyeblink classical conditioning is independent of awareness. , 2002 .

[25]  Robert E. Clark,et al.  Human Eyeblink Classical Conditioning: Effects of Manipulating Awareness of the Stimulus Contingencies , 1999 .

[26]  C. Koch,et al.  A framework for consciousness , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  M. M. Patterson,et al.  Retention and acquisition of classical trace conditioned responses by rabbits with hippocampal lesions. , 1986, Behavioral neuroscience.

[28]  C. Yeo,et al.  Hippocampal lesions and trace conditioning in the rabbit , 1987, Behavioural Brain Research.

[29]  A. Chaudhuri,et al.  Molecular maps of neural activity and quiescence. , 2000, Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis.

[30]  T. Robbins,et al.  Lesions of the medial and lateral striatum in the rat produce differential deficits in attentional performance. , 2001, Behavioral neuroscience.

[31]  B. Pitt Psychopharmacology , 1968, Mental Health.

[32]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Amygdala–Hippocampal Involvement in Human Aversive Trace Conditioning Revealed through Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  R. Faull,et al.  The use of c-fos as a metabolic marker in neuronal pathway tracing , 1989, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[34]  T. Robbins,et al.  The 5-choice serial reaction time task: behavioural pharmacology and functional neurochemistry , 2002, Psychopharmacology.

[35]  John F. Disterhoft,et al.  Lesions of the Caudal Area of Rabbit Medial Prefrontal Cortex Impair Trace Eyeblink Conditioning , 1998, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[36]  S. Grossberg The Attentive Brain , 1995 .

[37]  T. Bussey,et al.  Dissociable effects of cingulate and medial frontal cortex lesions on stimulus-reward learning using a novel Pavlovian autoshaping procedure for the rat: implications for the neurobiology of emotion. , 1997, Behavioral neuroscience.

[38]  A. Dale,et al.  Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex: A role in reward-based decision making , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  M. Posner,et al.  Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[40]  S. Rauch,et al.  The counting stroop: An interference task specialized for functional neuroimaging—validation study with functional MRI , 1998, Human brain mapping.

[41]  R. Bevins,et al.  Conditioned Stimulus Determinants of Conditioned Response Form in Pavlovian Fear Conditioning , 1996 .

[42]  W. F. Prokasy,et al.  Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory. , 1972 .

[43]  J. Allman,et al.  The Anterior Cingulate Cortex , 2001, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[44]  T. Bast,et al.  Hippocampus and classical fear conditioning , 2001, Hippocampus.

[45]  Greg D. Gale,et al.  Hippocampus and contextual fear conditioning: Recent controversies and advances , 2001, Hippocampus.

[46]  C. Koch,et al.  Brain Areas Specific for Attentional Load in a Motion-Tracking Task , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.