Is Failure Good

Approximately 80-90 percent of new firms ultimately fail. The tendency is to think of this failure as wasteful. We, however, examine whether there are economic benefits to offset the waste. We characterize three potential mechanisms through which excess entry affects market structure, firm behavior, and efficiency, then test them in the banking industry. Results indicate that failed firms generate externalities that significantly and substantially reduce industry cost. On average these benefits exceed the private costs of the entrants. Thus failure appears to be good for the economy.

[1]  J. Schumpeter Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[2]  O. Williamson Innovation and Market Structure , 1965, Journal of Political Economy.

[3]  H. Demsetz Industry Structure, Market Rivalry, and Public Policy , 1973, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[4]  D. Aigner,et al.  P. Schmidt, 1977,?Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models,? , 1977 .

[5]  Louis E. Yelle THE LEARNING CURVE: HISTORICAL REVIEW AND COMPREHENSIVE SURVEY , 1979 .

[6]  M. Spence The Learning Curve and Competition , 1981 .

[7]  Boyan Jovanovic Selection and the evolution of industry , 1981 .

[8]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  LIMIT PRICING AND ENTRY UNDER INCOMPLETE INFORMATION: AN EQUILIBRIUM ANALYSIS' , 1982 .

[9]  S. Lippman,et al.  Uncertain Imitability: An Analysis of Interfirm Differences in Efficiency under Competition , 1982 .

[10]  W. Baumol Contestable Markets: An Uprising in the Theory of Industry Structure , 1982 .

[11]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[12]  A. Jaffe Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms&Apos; Patents, Profits and Market Value , 1986 .

[13]  J. Geanakoplos,et al.  Free Entry and Social Inefficiency , 1986 .

[14]  M. Lieberman The learning curve, diffusion, and competitive strategy , 1987 .

[15]  A. Jaffe Demand and Supply Influences in R&D Intensity and Productivity Growth , 1988 .

[16]  Jennifer F. Reinganum The timing of innovation: Research, development, and diffusion , 1989 .

[17]  G. Carroll,et al.  Density Dependence in the Evolution of Populations of Newspaper Organizations , 1989 .

[18]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  Empirical studies of innovation and market structure , 1989 .

[19]  P. A. Gerosky,et al.  Innovation and the Evolution of Market Structure , 1990 .

[20]  M. Porter The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[21]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Honeymoons and the Liability of Adolescence: A New Perspective on Duration Dependence in Social and Organizational Relationships , 1991 .

[22]  Daniel A. Levinthal Random Walks and Organizational Mortality , 1991 .

[23]  Allen N. Berger,et al.  Bank efficiency derived from the profit function , 1993 .

[24]  Benjamin E. Hermalin,et al.  The Determinants of Efficiency and Solvency in Savings and Loans , 1992 .

[25]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Localized Competition and Organizational Failure in the Manhattan Hotel Industry, 1898-1990 , 1992 .

[26]  A. S. Cebenoyan,et al.  Foreign Takeover Activity in the U.S. and Wealth Effects for Target Firm Shareholders , 1992 .

[27]  Loretta J. Mester Efficiency in the savings and loan industry , 1993 .

[28]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  An Evolutionary Model of Organizational Performance , 1994 .

[29]  R. Blundell,et al.  Dynamic Count Data Models of Technological Innovation , 1994 .

[30]  J. Vickers Concepts of Competition , 1995 .

[31]  David C. Wheelock,et al.  Evaluating the efficiency of commercial banks: does our view of what banks do matter? , 1995 .

[32]  S. Nickell Competition and Corporate Performance , 1996, Journal of Political Economy.

[33]  S. Klepper Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation over the Product Life Cycle , 1996 .

[34]  A. Swaminathan Environmental Conditions at Founding and Organizational Mortality: A Trial-by-Fire Model , 1996 .

[35]  M. Hannan Rethinking Age Dependence in Organizational Mortality: Logical Fromalizations1 , 1998, American Journal of Sociology.

[36]  P. Peretto Cost reduction, entry, and the interdependence of market structure and economic growth , 1999 .

[37]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Overconfidence and Excess Entry: An Experimental Approach , 1999 .

[38]  Mark Doms,et al.  Understanding Productivity: Lessons from Longitudinal Microdata , 2000 .

[39]  P. P. McDougall,et al.  An examination of the impact of initial founding conditions and decisions upon the performance of new bank start-ups , 2000 .

[40]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  What's Experience Got to Do With It? Sources of Cost Reduction in a Large Specialty Chemicals Producer , 2000 .

[41]  A. Stinchcombe Social Structure and Organizations , 2000, Political Organizations.

[42]  M. Petersen,et al.  Does Distance Still Matter? The Information Revolution in Small Business Lending , 2000 .

[43]  J. Vickers,et al.  Competition, Imitation and Growth with Step-by-Step Innovation , 2001 .

[44]  Jeffrey R. Campbell,et al.  The Link between Aggregate and Micro Productivity Growth: Evidence from Retail Trade , 2002 .

[45]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  The Red Queen in organizational creation and development , 2002 .

[46]  Brian Headd Redefining Business Success: Distinguishing Between Closure and Failure , 2003 .

[47]  D. Robinson,et al.  Industry Concentration and Average Stock Returns , 2005 .

[48]  A. Knott Persistent heterogeneity and sustainable innovation , 2003 .

[49]  G. Hoetker,et al.  DEATH HURTS, BUT IT ISN'T FATAL: THE POSTEXIT DIFFUSION OF KNOWLEDGE CREATED BY INNOVATIVE COMPANIES. , 2005 .

[50]  Anne Marie Knott,et al.  Entrepreneurial Risk and Market Entry , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[51]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  The red queen in organizational evolution , 2007 .