Bone Adaptation-Driven Design of Periodic Scaffolds

This work introduces a computational method for designing bone scaffolds for maximum bone growth. A mechanobiological model of bone adaptation is used to compute the bone growth, taking into account the shape of the defect, the applied loading, and the existing density distribution of the bone in which the scaffold has been implanted. Numerical homogenization and a geometry projection technique are used to efficiently obtain surrogates of the effective elastic and diffusive properties of the scaffold as a function of the scaffold design and the bone density. These property surrogates are in turn used to perform bone adaptation simulations of the scaffold–bone system for a sampling of scaffold designs. Surrogates of the bone growth in the scaffold at the end of the simulated time and of the strain energy of the scaffold at implantation time are subsequently constructed from these simulations. Using these surrogates, we optimize the design of a scaffold implanted in a rabbit femur to maximize volume bone growth into the scaffold while ensuring a minimum stiffness at implantation. The results of the optimization demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method by showing that maximizing bone growth with a constraint on structural compliance renders scaffold designs with better bone growth than what would be obtained by only minimizing compliance.

[1]  M Doblaré,et al.  Application of an anisotropic bone-remodelling model based on a damage-repair theory to the analysis of the proximal femur before and after total hip replacement. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  Cato T Laurencin,et al.  Bone tissue engineering: recent advances and challenges. , 2012, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[3]  Damiano Pasini,et al.  Hip Implant Design With Three-Dimensional Porous Architecture of Optimized Graded Density , 2018, Journal of Mechanical Design.

[4]  Kristina Shea,et al.  Design of Hierarchical Three-Dimensional Printed Scaffolds Considering Mechanical and Biological Factors for Bone Tissue Engineering , 2017 .

[5]  Henrique A Almeida,et al.  Design of tissue engineering scaffolds based on hyperbolic surfaces: structural numerical evaluation. , 2014, Medical engineering & physics.

[6]  G. Duda,et al.  Computational analyses of different intervertebral cages for lumbar spinal fusion. , 2015, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  Camille Metz,et al.  Towards multi-dynamic mechano-biological optimization of 3D-printed scaffolds to foster bone regeneration. , 2019, Acta biomaterialia.

[8]  J. Tehranzadeh,et al.  Relationships between material properties and CT scan data of cortical bone with and without metastatic lesions. , 2003, Medical engineering & physics.

[9]  Safdar N. Khan,et al.  The Biology of Bone Grafting , 2005, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[10]  B. van Rietbergen,et al.  Bone remodelling in humans is load-driven but not lazy , 2014, Nature Communications.

[11]  G. Logroscino,et al.  Bone substitutes in orthopaedic surgery: from basic science to clinical practice , 2014, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine.

[12]  Joel Nothman,et al.  SciPy 1.0-Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python , 2019, ArXiv.

[13]  M. Bendsøe,et al.  A geometry projection method for shape optimization , 2004 .

[14]  Alok Sutradhar,et al.  Topological optimization for designing patient-specific large craniofacial segmental bone replacements , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Cato T. Laurencin,et al.  Bone-Graft Substitutes: Facts, Fictions, and Applications , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  Noboru Kikuchi,et al.  Characterization of the mechanical behaviors of solid-fluid mixture by the homogenization method , 1998 .

[17]  Wacław Kuś,et al.  Optimization of bone scaffold structures using experimental and numerical data , 2016 .

[18]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  Making the Most Out of Surrogate Models: Tricks of the Trade , 2010, DAC 2010.

[19]  James C. Weaver,et al.  Mechanobiologically optimized 3D titanium-mesh scaffolds enhance bone regeneration in critical segmental defects in sheep , 2018, Science Translational Medicine.

[20]  Guoying Dong,et al.  A 149 Line Homogenization Code for Three-Dimensional Cellular Materials Written in matlab , 2018, Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology.

[21]  P. Giannoudis,et al.  Fracture healing: the diamond concept. , 2007, Injury.

[22]  T. Adachi,et al.  Framework for optimal design of porous scaffold microstructure by computational simulation of bone regeneration. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[23]  R. Martin Porosity and specific surface of bone. , 1984, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[24]  Q. Rong,et al.  Finite-element design and optimization of a three-dimensional tetrahedral porous titanium scaffold for the reconstruction of mandibular defects. , 2017, Medical engineering & physics.

[25]  Ralph Müller,et al.  Quantitative micro-computed tomography: a non-invasive method to assess equivalent bone mineral density. , 2008, Bone.

[26]  J. Norato,et al.  A computational and cellular solids approach to the stiffness-based design of bone scaffolds. , 2011, Journal of Biomechanical Engineering.

[27]  S. Hollister,et al.  Optimization of scaffold design for bone tissue engineering: A computational and experimental study. , 2014, Medical engineering & physics.

[28]  S. E. Zarantonello,et al.  A note on piecewise linear and multilinear table interpolation in many dimensions , 1988 .

[29]  G. Kemp,et al.  Validation of calcaneus trabecular microstructure measurements by HR-pQCT. , 2018, Bone.

[30]  Jan Wieding,et al.  Numerical optimization of open-porous bone scaffold structures to match the elastic properties of human cortical bone. , 2014, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[31]  Ian Gibson,et al.  Design of Three-Dimensional, Triply Periodic Unit Cell Scaffold Structures for Additive Manufacturing , 2018 .

[32]  A. Musset,et al.  Bone substitutes: a review of their characteristics, clinical use, and perspectives for large bone defects management , 2018, Journal of tissue engineering.

[33]  Josep A Planell,et al.  Simulation of tissue differentiation in a scaffold as a function of porosity, Young's modulus and dissolution rate: application of mechanobiological models in tissue engineering. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[34]  K. Yeung,et al.  Bone grafts and biomaterials substitutes for bone defect repair: A review , 2017, Bioactive materials.

[35]  Guolei Zheng,et al.  A Survey of Modeling and Optimization Methods for Multi-Scale Heterogeneous Lattice Structures , 2020 .

[36]  D. Carter,et al.  A unifying principle relating stress to trabecular bone morphology , 1986, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[37]  D. Kaplan,et al.  Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[38]  Julián A. Norato,et al.  Computational design of curvilinear bone scaffolds fabricated via direct ink writing , 2018, Comput. Aided Des..

[39]  Amy J Wagoner Johnson,et al.  Multiscale osteointegration as a new paradigm for the design of calcium phosphate scaffolds for bone regeneration. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[40]  N. Kikuchi,et al.  A comparison of homogenization and standard mechanics analyses for periodic porous composites , 1992 .

[41]  D. Tortorelli,et al.  A geometry projection method for continuum-based topology optimization with discrete elements , 2015 .

[42]  G. Beaupré,et al.  An approach for time‐dependent bone modeling and remodeling—application: A preliminary remodeling simulation , 1990, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[43]  J. A. Sanz-Herrera,et al.  A mathematical model for bone tissue regeneration inside a specific type of scaffold , 2008, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[44]  C. Finkemeier,et al.  Bone-grafting and bone-graft substitutes. , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[45]  Samantha J. Polak,et al.  Analysis of the roles of microporosity and BMP-2 on multiple measures of bone regeneration and healing in calcium phosphate scaffolds. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.

[46]  Guangyao Liu,et al.  Engineered three-dimensional scaffolds for enhanced bone regeneration in osteonecrosis , 2020, Bioactive materials.

[47]  M. Fiorentino,et al.  Rhombicuboctahedron unit cell based scaffolds for bone regeneration: geometry optimization with a mechanobiology - driven algorithm. , 2018, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[48]  Kristina Shea,et al.  Mechanics of Three-Dimensional Printed Lattices for Biomedical Devices , 2019, Journal of Mechanical Design.

[49]  Samantha J. Polak,et al.  The effect of BMP-2 on micro- and macroscale osteointegration of biphasic calcium phosphate scaffolds with multiscale porosity. , 2010, Acta biomaterialia.

[50]  Tahmineh Razi,et al.  Relationship between Hounsfield Unit in CT Scan and Gray Scale in CBCT , 2014, Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects.

[51]  Kwang-Yong Kim,et al.  Effects of Latin hypercube sampling on surrogate modeling and optimization , 2017 .

[52]  G S Beaupré,et al.  An approach for time‐dependent bone modeling and remodeling—theoretical development , 1990, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[53]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  An accurate estimation of bone density improves the accuracy of subject-specific finite element models. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[54]  Julián A. Norato,et al.  A geometry projection method for the topology optimization of plate structures , 2016 .

[55]  Andrew G Alleyne,et al.  Micro-robotic deposition guidelines by a design of experiments approach to maximize fabrication reliability for the bone scaffold application. , 2008, Acta biomaterialia.

[56]  Julián A. Norato,et al.  A MATLAB code for topology optimization using the geometry projection method , 2020 .

[57]  Caitlyn J. Collins,et al.  Validation of HR-pQCT against micro-CT for morphometric and biomechanical analyses: A review , 2020, Bone reports.

[58]  Jeff Houck,et al.  Rabbit knee joint biomechanics: Motion analysis and modeling of forces during hopping , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[59]  A S Brydone,et al.  Bone grafting, orthopaedic biomaterials, and the clinical need for bone engineering , 2010, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[60]  D. Biau,et al.  The indications and donor‐site morbidity of tibial cortical strut autografts in the management of defects in long bones , 2018, The bone & joint journal.

[61]  Rozalia Dimitriou,et al.  Bone regeneration: current concepts and future directions , 2011, BMC medicine.

[62]  Georg N Duda,et al.  Scaffold curvature-mediated novel biomineralization process originates a continuous soft tissue-to-bone interface. , 2017, Acta biomaterialia.

[63]  Casper Schousboe Andreasen,et al.  How to determine composite material properties using numerical homogenization , 2014 .

[64]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  A Python surrogate modeling framework with derivatives , 2019, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[65]  Julián A. Norato,et al.  Topology Optimization of Structures Made of Discrete Geometric Components With Different Materials , 2018, Journal of Mechanical Design.

[66]  Sharmila Majumdar,et al.  A Local Adaptive Threshold Strategy for High Resolution Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography of Trabecular Bone , 2007, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.