Input Guided Performance Evaluation

Performance evaluation is a difficult and very challenging task. In spite of many discussions in the literature, e.g., (Haralick et al., 1994), and well understood goals, e.g., (Christensen and Forstner, 1997; Haralick, 1994), there is a wide gap between what performance assessment using simple, synthetic data predicts and what is obtained when the same algorithms are applied to real data.

[1]  Peter Meer,et al.  Performance Assessment Through Bootstrap , 1997, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[2]  Andrew W. Fitzgibbon,et al.  An Experimental Comparison of Range Image Segmentation Algorithms , 1996, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[3]  Anthony C. Davison,et al.  Bootstrap Methods and Their Application , 1998 .

[4]  Peter Meer,et al.  Image Segmentation from Consensus Information , 1997, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[5]  Debashis Kushary,et al.  Bootstrap Methods and Their Application , 2000, Technometrics.

[6]  Robert B. Fisher,et al.  Estimating 3-D rigid body transformations: a comparison of four major algorithms , 1997, Machine Vision and Applications.

[7]  David E. Tyler,et al.  Performance Assessment by Resampling: Rigid Motion Estimators , 1998 .

[8]  Henrik I. Christensen,et al.  EditorialPerformance characteristics of vision algorithms , 1997, Machine Vision and Applications.

[9]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Performance Characterization in Computer Vision , 1993, BMVC.

[10]  Allan D. Jepson,et al.  A new closed-form solution for absolute orientation , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[11]  S. Umeyama,et al.  Least-Squares Estimation of Transformation Parameters Between Two Point Patterns , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[12]  Sudeep Sarkar,et al.  Robust Visual Method for Assessing the Relative Performance of Edge-Detection Algorithms , 1997, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..