Earnouts: The Effects of Adverse Selection and Agency Costs on Acquisition Techniques

We examine the effects of adverse selection and agency costs on the structure of the consideration offered in an acquisition. Specifically we investigate factors affecting the benefits arising from use of earnouts. We find that when targets have greater private information, consideration is more likely to be based on the future performance of the target. We also find an earnout is more likely to be used in an acquisition if the target is a smaller, private company in a different industry than the acquirer. In addition, earnouts are more likely to be used when fewer acquisitions take place within an industry and when targets are service companies or companies with more unrecorded assets. Finally, we compare the use of earnouts with the use of stock and find that financing considerations are a more important factor in the use of stock. Copyright 2001 by Oxford University Press.

[1]  E. Fama,et al.  The Cross‐Section of Expected Stock Returns , 1992 .

[2]  R. Ball Making Accounting More International: Why, How, And How Far Will It Go? , 1995 .

[3]  Arturo Estrella,et al.  A new measure of fit for equations with dichotomous dependent variables , 1998 .

[4]  Jerold B. Warner,et al.  On financial contracting: An analysis of bond covenants , 1979 .

[5]  B. Eckbo,et al.  Asymmetric Information and the Medium of Exchange in Takeovers: Theory and Tests , 1990 .

[6]  Sheridan Titman,et al.  Share Tendering Strategies and the Success of Hostile Takeover Bids , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.

[7]  Edson,et al.  The Art of M&A : A Merger Acquisition Buyout Guide , 1989 .

[8]  M. Zmijewski,et al.  Cross-sectional variation in the stock market response to accounting earnings announcements☆ , 1989 .

[9]  Myron S. Scholes Taxes and Business Strategy: A Planning Approach , 2001 .

[10]  Hayne E. Leland,et al.  INFORMATIONAL ASYMMETRIES, FINANCIAL STRUCTURE, AND FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION , 1977 .

[11]  Srikant M. Datar,et al.  The role of audits and audit quality in valuing new issues , 1991 .

[12]  E. Fama,et al.  Industry costs of equity , 1997 .

[13]  Robert Heinkel,et al.  Signaling and the Valuation of Unseasoned New Issues , 1982 .

[14]  A. Shleifer,et al.  Large Shareholders and Corporate Control , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[15]  Myron B. Slovin,et al.  Alternative flotation methods, adverse selection, and ownership structure : evidence from seasoned equity issuance in the U.K. , 2000 .

[16]  P. Schmidt,et al.  Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. , 1984 .

[17]  G. William Schwert,et al.  Size and stock returns, and other empirical regularities , 1983 .

[18]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Harvard Business School; SSRN; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Harvard University - Accounting & Control Unit , 1976 .

[19]  Paul Zarowin,et al.  The boundaries of financial reporting and how to extend them , 1999 .

[20]  M. L. Rock The Mergers and Acquisitions Handbook , 1994 .

[21]  The law and finance of corporate acquisitions , 1995 .

[22]  Gary D. Eppen,et al.  Capital Rationing and Organizational Slack in Capital Budgeting , 1985 .

[23]  Paul A. Gompers Optimal Investment, Monitoring, and the Staging of Venture Capital , 1995 .

[24]  J. Lerner The Syndication of Venture Capital Investments , 1994 .

[25]  S. P. Kothari,et al.  Firm size and the information content of prices with respect to earnings , 1987 .

[26]  Andrew Postlewaite,et al.  Quality Testing and Disclosure , 1985 .

[27]  Bengt Holmstrom,et al.  Moral Hazard and Observability , 1979 .