Managing threatened species: the ecological toolbox, evolutionary theory and declining-population paradigm

1. The management of threatened species is an important practical way in which conservationists can intervene in the extinction process and reduce the loss of biodiversity. Understanding the causes of population declines (past, present and future) is pivotal to designing effective practical management. This is the declining-population paradigm identified by Caughley. 2. There are three broad classes of ecological tool used by conservationists to guide management decisions for threatened species: statistical models of habitat use, demographic models and behaviour-based models. Each of these is described here, illustrated with a case study and evaluated critically in terms of its practical application. 3. These tools are fundamentally different. Statistical models of habitat use and demographic models both use descriptions of patterns in abundance and demography, in relation to a range of factors, to inform management decisions. In contrast, behaviour-based models describe the evolutionary processes underlying these patterns, and derive such patterns from the strategies employed by individuals when competing for resources under a specific set of environmental conditions. 4. Statistical models of habitat use and demographic models have been used successfully to make management recommendations for declining populations. To do this, assumptions are made about population growth or vital rates that will apply when environmental conditions are restored, based on either past data collected under favourable environmental conditions or estimates of these parameters when the agent of decline is removed. As a result, they can only be used to make reliable quantitative predictions about future environments when a comparable environment has been experienced by the population of interest in the past. 5. Many future changes in the environment driven by management will not have been experienced by a population in the past. Under these circumstances, vital rates and their relationship with population density will change in the future in a way that is not predictable from past patterns. Reliable quantitative predictions about population-level responses then need to be based on an explicit consideration of the evolutionary processes operating at the individual level. 6. Synthesis and applications. It is argued that evolutionary theory underpins Caughley's declining-population paradigm, and that it needs to become much more widely used within mainstream conservation biology. This will help conservationists examine critically the reliability of the tools they have traditionally used to aid management decision-making. It will also give them access to alternative tools, particularly when predictions are required for changes in the environment that have not been experienced by a population in the past.

[1]  Martin Drechsler,et al.  Uncertainty in population dynamics and its consequences for the management of the orange-bellied parrot Neophema chrysogaster , 1998 .

[2]  Michael J. Wisdom,et al.  Life Stage Simulation Analysis: Estimating Vital-Rate Effects on Population Growth for Conservation , 2000 .

[3]  T Coulson,et al.  The use and abuse of population viability analysis. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[4]  A. Grant,et al.  Elasticity analysis as an important tool in evolutionary and population ecology. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[5]  D. E. Matthews Evolution and the Theory of Games , 1977 .

[6]  Larry B. Crowder,et al.  A Stage‐Based Population Model for Loggerhead Sea Turtles and Implications for Conservation , 1987 .

[7]  L. Keller,et al.  Inbreeding effects in wild populations. , 2002 .

[8]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  A simple landscape-scale test of a spatially explicit population model: patch occupancy in fragmented south-eastern Australian forests , 2001 .

[9]  R. Green Factors affecting the population density of the corncrake Crex crex in Britain and Ireland , 1996 .

[10]  Daniel Simberloff,et al.  Threatened Birds of the World , 2001 .

[11]  P. Gaona,et al.  A demographic model for a population of the endangered lesser kestrel in southern Spain , 1996 .

[12]  Juan C. Alonso,et al.  Habitat preferences of great bustard Otis tarda flocks in the arable steppes of central Spain: are potentially suitable areas unoccupied? , 2001 .

[13]  I. Owens,et al.  Ecological basis of extinction risk in birds: habitat loss versus human persecution and introduced predators. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  I. Owens,et al.  Variation in extinction risk among birds: chance or evolutionary predisposition? , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  H. Akçakaya,et al.  Viability analyses with habitat-based metapopulation models , 2000, Population Ecology.

[16]  A. Dobson,et al.  Prevention of population cycles by parasite removal. , 1998, Science.

[17]  Richard Williams Modelling population dynamics of great crested newts (Triturus cristatus): A population viability analysis) , 2000 .

[18]  Steven R. Beissinger,et al.  Emerging Issues in Population Viability Analysis , 2002, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[19]  J. Alba-Tercedor,et al.  Ecology of the native and introduced crayfishes Austropotamobius pallipes and Procambarus clarkii in southern Spain and implications for conservation of the native species , 2002 .

[20]  R. Green Diagnosing the causes of bird population declines using comparative methods: The value of data from ringing , 1999 .

[21]  Stephens,et al.  Consequences of the Allee effect for behaviour, ecology and conservation. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[22]  Graeme Caughley,et al.  Directions in conservation biology , 1994 .

[23]  Michael J. Wisdom,et al.  Reliability of Conservation Actions Based on Elasticity Analysis of Matrix Models , 1999 .

[24]  John Bell,et al.  A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models , 1997, Environmental Conservation.

[25]  Georgina M. Mace,et al.  Assessing Extinction Threats: Toward a Reevaluation of IUCN Threatened Species Categories , 1991 .

[26]  Paul Beier,et al.  Population viability analysis. , 2016 .

[27]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Effects of Turtle Excluder Devices (TEDs) on Loggerhead Sea Turtle Strandings with Implications for Conservation , 1995 .

[28]  Richard A. Stillman,et al.  Conserving Bird Biodiversity: Predicting the impact of environmental change , 2002 .

[29]  H. Caswell Matrix population models : construction, analysis, and interpretation , 2001 .

[30]  Michael A. Larson,et al.  Population viability of piping plovers: Effects of predator exclusion , 2002 .

[31]  R. May Unanswered questions in ecology. , 1999, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[32]  R. Green,et al.  Survival and behaviour of Corncrake Crex crex chicks during the mowing of agricultural grassland , 1998 .

[33]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  An autologistic model for the spatial distribution of wildlife , 1996 .

[34]  Stephen P. Ellner,et al.  When is it meaningful to estimate an extinction probability , 2000 .

[35]  A. Balmford,et al.  Extinction filters and current resilience: the significance of past selection pressures for conservation biology. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[36]  M. Wooten,et al.  Viability analysis of endangered Gulf Coast beach mice (Peromyscus polionotus) populations , 2001 .

[37]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  A spatial depletion model of the interaction between bean geese and wigeon with the consequences for habitat management , 1994 .

[38]  S. Beissinger,et al.  Applying the Declining Population Paradigm: Diagnosing Causes of Poor Reproduction in the Marbled Murrelet , 2004 .

[39]  R. Shine,et al.  Lying in Wait for Extinction: Ecological Correlates of Conservation Status among Australian Elapid Snakes , 2002 .

[40]  J. Krebs,et al.  Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach , 1978 .

[41]  D. Russo,et al.  Habitat selection by the Mediterranean horseshoe bat, Rhinolophus euryale (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) in a rural area of southern Italy and implications for conservation , 2002 .

[42]  Rhys E. Green,et al.  Conserving Bird Biodiversity: Diagnosing causes of population declines and selecting remedial actions , 2002 .

[43]  D. Ludwig Is it meaningful to estimate a probability of extinction , 1999 .

[44]  S. Fretwell,et al.  On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds , 1969 .

[45]  S. Fretwell,et al.  On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds , 1969 .

[46]  Martin Drechsler A model-based decision aid for species protection under uncertainty , 2000 .

[47]  Amy W. Ando,et al.  On the Use of Demographic Models of Population Viability in Endangered Species Management , 1998 .

[48]  Ray Hilborn,et al.  The Influence of Model Structure on Conclusions about the Viability and Harvesting of Serengeti Wildebeest , 1997 .

[49]  John D. Reynolds,et al.  Population consequences of reproductive decisions , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[50]  H. Resit Akçakaya,et al.  Critiques of PVA Ask the Wrong Questions: Throwing the Heuristic Baby Out with the Numerical Bath Water , 2002, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[51]  Richard Shine,et al.  Conservation biology: Restoration of an inbred adder population , 1999, Nature.

[52]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  Intertidal habitat loss and wildfowl numbers: applications of a spatial depletion model , 1998 .

[53]  B. Miller,et al.  Rehabilitation of an endangered Australian bird: The Lord Howe Island woodhen Tricholimnas sylvestris (Sclater) , 1985 .

[54]  R. Green Applications of large-scale studies of demographic rates to bird conservation , 1999 .

[55]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  Predicting extinction risk in declining species , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[56]  Richard Frankham,et al.  Does population viability analysis software predict the behaviour of real populations? A retrospective study on the Lord Howe Island woodhen Tricholimnas sylvestris (Sclater) , 1997 .

[57]  W. Sutherland From Individual Behaviour to Population Ecology , 1996 .

[58]  Stephen P. Ellner,et al.  Precision of Population Viability Analysis , 2002, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[59]  P. Dolman,et al.  Combining behaviour and population dynamics with applications for predicting consequences of habitat loss , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[60]  S. Beissinger,et al.  When Relocation of Loggerhead Sea Turtle (Caretta caretta) Nests Becomes a Useful Strategy , 1997 .

[61]  Andrew R. Bearlin,et al.  Lessons about extinction and translocation: models for eastern barred bandicoots (Perameles gunnii) at Woodlands Historic Park, Victoria, Australia , 2002 .

[62]  N. Asquith Misdirections in Conservation Biology , 2001 .

[63]  R. Fuller,et al.  Modeling impacts and costs of gray squirrel control regimes on the viability of red squirrel populations , 2002 .

[64]  H. Kokko,et al.  Optimal Floating and Queuing Strategies: Consequences for Density Dependence and Habitat Loss , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[65]  H. Caswell PROSPECTIVE AND RETROSPECTIVE PERTURBATION ANALYSES: THEIR ROLES IN CONSERVATION BIOLOGY , 2000 .

[66]  W. Morris,et al.  POPULATION VIABILITY ANALYSIS IN ENDANGERED SPECIES RECOVERY PLANS: PAST USE AND FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS , 2002 .

[67]  Andrew D. West,et al.  Predicting mortality in novel environments: tests and sensitivity of a behaviour‐based model , 2000 .

[68]  C. M. Lessells,et al.  The Evolution of Life Histories , 1994 .

[69]  John R. Krebs,et al.  Predicting population responses to resource management , 2001 .

[70]  A. Dobson,et al.  Strengthening the Use of Science In Achieving the Goals of the Endangered Species Act: An Assessment By the Ecological Society of America , 1996 .

[71]  W. Sutherland,et al.  Model complexity and population predictions. The alpine marmot as a case study , 2002 .

[72]  Marc Mangel,et al.  Dynamic models in behavioural and evolutionary ecology , 1988, Nature.

[73]  Michael J. Wisdom,et al.  Elasticity Analysis for Conservation Decision Making: Reply to Ehrlén et al. , 2001 .

[74]  Michael C. Runge,et al.  THE IMPORTANCE OF FUNCTIONAL FORM IN OPTIMAL CONTROL SOLUTIONS OF PROBLEMS IN POPULATION DYNAMICS , 2002 .

[75]  J. Knight If they could talk to the animals... , 2001, Nature.

[76]  Rhys E. Green,et al.  The Decline of the Corncrake Crex crex in Britain and Ireland in Relation to Habitat Change , 1993 .

[77]  Paul C. Cross,et al.  Using Logistic Regression to Analyze the Sensitivity of PVA Models: a Comparison of Methods Based on African Wild Dog Models , 2001 .

[78]  Philip W. Hedrick,et al.  Directions in Conservation Biology: Comments on Caughley , 1996 .

[79]  W. Sutherland,et al.  Depletion models can predict shorebird distribution at different spatial scales , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[80]  J. M. Winterbottom,et al.  BIRD POPULATION STUDIES: B. The Population of Twenty-one Acres near Fort Jameson , 1933 .

[81]  Robert G. Pople,et al.  Threatened birds of the world 2004 , 2004 .

[82]  C. Clark,et al.  Fitness components of avian migration: A dynamic model of Western Sandpiper migration , 1999 .

[83]  Eric C. Hellgren,et al.  Microhabitat Selection by Texas Horned Lizards in Southern Texas , 2001 .

[84]  Johan Ehrlén,et al.  Reliability of Elasticity Analysis: Reply to Mills et al. , 2001 .

[85]  P. Holgate,et al.  Matrix Population Models. , 1990 .

[86]  L. Lens,et al.  Habitat selection and conservation of Sharpe's longclaw (Macronyx sharpei), a threatened Kenyan grassland endemic , 2002 .

[87]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  The buffer effect and large-scale population regulation in migratory birds , 2001, Nature.

[88]  W. Sutherland,et al.  Habitat switching by dark-bellied brent geese Branta b. bernicla (L.) in relation to food depletion , 1995, Oecologia.

[89]  H. Resit Akçakaya,et al.  Predictive accuracy of population viability analysis in conservation biology , 2000, Nature.

[90]  J. Komdeur,et al.  Importance of habitat saturation and territory quality for evolution of cooperative breeding in the Seychelles warbler , 1992, Nature.

[91]  Larry B. Crowder,et al.  Predicting the impact of Turtle Excluder Devices on loggerhead sea turtle populations , 1994 .

[92]  Richard A. Stillman,et al.  Predicting shorebird mortality and population size under different regimes of shellfishery management , 2001 .

[93]  David Gutiérrez,et al.  Habitat‐based statistical models for predicting the spatial distribution of butterflies and day‐flying moths in a fragmented landscape , 2000 .

[94]  K. Norris,et al.  Is the density of redshank Tringa totanus nesting on saltmarshes in Great Britain declining due to changes in grazing management , 1998 .

[95]  D. DeAngelis,et al.  Individual-Based Models and Approaches in Ecology , 1992 .

[96]  S. Manel,et al.  Alternative methods for predicting species distribution: an illustration with Himalayan river birds , 1999 .

[97]  L. Crowder,et al.  population viability analysis for red-cockaded woodpeckers using an individual-based model , 2002 .

[98]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Towards a behavioral ecology of ecological landscapes. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[99]  R. Green,et al.  A simulation model of the effect of mowing of agricultural grassland on the breeding success of the corncrake (Crex crex) , 1997 .