Content horizons for conditional variance forecasts

Abstract Using realized variance to estimate daily conditional variance of financial returns, we compare forecasts of daily variance from standard GARCH and FIGARCH models estimated by Quasi-Maximum Likelihood (QML), and from projections on past realized volatilities obtained from high-frequency data. We consider horizons extending to 30 trading days. The forecasts are compared with the unconditional sample variance of daily returns treated as a predictor of daily variance, allowing us to estimate the maximum horizon at which conditioning information has exploitable value for variance forecasting. With foreign exchange return data (DM/$US and Yen/$US), we find evidence of forecasting power at horizons of up to 30 trading days, on each of two financial returns series. We also find some evidence that the result of (e.g.) Bollerslev and Wright [Bollerslev, T., & Wright, J. H. (2001) High-frequency data, frequency domain inference, and volatility forecasting. Review of Economics and Statistics , 83, 596–602], that projections on past realized variance provide better one-step forecasts than the QML-GARCH and -FIGARCH forecasts, appears to extend to longer horizons up to around 10 to 15 trading days. At longer horizons, there is less to distinguish the forecast methods, but the evidence does suggest positive forecast content at 30 days for various forecast types.

[1]  F. Diebold,et al.  Comparing Predictive Accuracy , 1994, Business Cycles.

[2]  T. Bollerslev,et al.  Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity , 1986 .

[3]  Halbert White,et al.  Tests of Conditional Predictive Ability , 2003 .

[4]  F. Diebold,et al.  The Distribution of Realized Exchange Rate Volatility , 2000 .

[5]  N. Meddahi,et al.  A theoretical comparison between integrated and realized volatility , 2002 .

[6]  M. Dacorogna,et al.  A geographical model for the daily and weekly seasonal volatility in the foreign exchange market , 1993 .

[7]  Francis X. Diebold,et al.  Modeling and Forecasting Realized Volatility , 2001 .

[8]  Tim Bollerslev,et al.  High Frequency Data, Frequency Domain Inference and Volatility Forecasting , 1999 .

[9]  N. Shephard,et al.  Estimating quadratic variation using realized variance , 2002 .

[10]  John W. Galbraith,et al.  Content horizons for univariate time-series forecasts , 2003 .

[11]  F. Diebold,et al.  How Relevant is Volatility Forecasting for Financial Risk Management? , 1997 .

[12]  R. Engle.  Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation , 1982 .

[13]  Todd E. Clark,et al.  Tests of Equal Forecast Accuracy and Encompassing for Nested Models , 1999 .

[14]  M. Dacorogna,et al.  Statistical study of foreign exchange rates, empirical evidence of a price change scaling law, and intraday analysis , 1990 .

[15]  T. Bollerslev,et al.  Intraday periodicity and volatility persistence in financial markets , 1997 .

[16]  R. Baillie,et al.  Fractionally integrated generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity , 1996 .

[17]  T. Bollerslev,et al.  ANSWERING THE SKEPTICS: YES, STANDARD VOLATILITY MODELS DO PROVIDE ACCURATE FORECASTS* , 1998 .

[18]  Tim Bollerslev,et al.  Trading Patterns and Prices in the Interbank Foreign Exchange Market , 1993 .