Fresh vs. frozen embryo transfer in assisted reproductive techniques: a single center retrospective cohort study and ethical-legal implications.

OBJECTIVE Several studies have shown higher pregnancy rates and better perinatal outcomes with frozen embryo transfers than with fresh techniques, with better results in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) but with a higher rate of pregnancy complications such as preeclampsia. This retrospective cohort study aims to compare the cumulative live birth rates, maternal and neonatal complications of fresh embryo transfers (ET) and frozen-embryo transfers (FET) in infertile women who underwent assisted reproduction techniques (ART) at the Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti (AOOR) Villa Sofia Cervello, Palermo, Italy. In addition, the authors have focused on the legislative and ethical complexities which such a procedure entails. PATIENTS AND METHODS Out of 475 women undergoing in vitro fertilization programs from January 2017 to January 2021, 128 were enrolled; 70 patients underwent ET, and 58 patients FET. The main outcome measure was live birth rates. Secondary outcomes were clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, pregnancy loss, low birth weight (LBW), ectopic pregnancy, and obstetrical and perinatal complications. RESULTS The cumulative live birth rates were similar between the fresh transfer (95.7%) and frozen transfer (93.1%). Biochemical pregnancy rates, clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, and pregnancy loss were similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS Obstetrical outcomes were not statistically different between the two groups; a higher preterm delivery rate was reported in the FET group. ET birth weights were notably lower for singletons compared to the freeze-all strategy. ET patients also had higher LBW rates, with a 2.5-fold higher rate compared to FET. No significant differences were found in cumulative live birth rates between ET and FET, which is consistent with earlier studies. FET protocols are linked to higher neonatal birth weight and lower risk of LBW than fresh ET. The ethical and legal quandaries inherent in such techniques, as technology moves on and outpaces current legislative frameworks, cannot be discounted.

[1]  R. Lustig,et al.  Study protocol for a Developmental Epidemiological Study of Children born through Reproductive Technologies (DESCRT). , 2023, Human reproduction open.

[2]  Y. Zhou,et al.  Effects of female body mass index on pregnancy during in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. , 2023, European review for medical and pharmacological sciences.

[3]  C. Grimes,et al.  Review of Endometrial Receptivity Array: A Personalized Approach to Embryo Transfer and Its Clinical Applications , 2023, Journal of personalized medicine.

[4]  Lisa M. Painter,et al.  Risk Management-Obstetrics and Gynecology Perspective. , 2023, Clinical obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  Zhansheng Pan,et al.  Predictive value of endometrial receptivity evaluated by three-dimensional ultrasound in ectopic pregnancy after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. , 2023, European review for medical and pharmacological sciences.

[6]  N. Acharya,et al.  Endometrial Receptivity During the Preimplantation Period: A Narrative Review , 2023, Cureus.

[7]  H. Bai,et al.  Effect modification by developmental stage of embryos on the association between late follicular phase progesterone elevation and live birth in fresh transfers , 2023, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[8]  A. Chavez-Badiola,et al.  New frontiers in embryo selection , 2023, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[9]  D. Cimadomo,et al.  ESHRE good practice recommendations on recurrent implantation failure , 2023, Human reproduction open.

[10]  G. Cucinella,et al.  The Future Is Coming: Artificial Intelligence in the Treatment of Infertility Could Improve Assisted Reproduction Outcomes—The Value of Regulatory Frameworks , 2022, Diagnostics.

[11]  B. Ata,et al.  SARS-CoV-2, fertility and assisted reproduction , 2022, Human reproduction update.

[12]  Xiaoxi Sun,et al.  The use of frozen embryos and frozen sperm have complementary IVF outcomes: a retrospective analysis in couples experiencing IVF/Donor and IVF/Husband , 2022, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[13]  D. Hagen,et al.  Differentially expressed tRNA-derived fragments in bovine fetuses with assisted reproduction induced congenital overgrowth syndrome , 2022, bioRxiv.

[14]  M. Scaglione,et al.  Neonatal Outcomes and Long-Term Follow-Up of Children Born from Frozen Embryo, a Narrative Review of Latest Research Findings , 2022, Medicina.

[15]  A. del Rio,et al.  Conscientious objection to abortion: how to strike a legal and ethical balance between conflicting rights? , 2022, Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis.

[16]  A. Ljubić,et al.  The Role of Cell and Gene Therapies in the Treatment of Infertility in Patients with Thyroid Autoimmunity , 2022, International journal of endocrinology.

[17]  M. Scaglione,et al.  Impact of assisted reproduction techniques on the neuro-psycho-motor outcome of newborns: a critical appraisal , 2022, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

[18]  P. Kolatkar,et al.  Long Non-Coding RNA and RNA-Binding Protein Interactions in Cancer: Experimental and Machine Learning Approaches. , 2022, Seminars in cancer biology.

[19]  A. Babwah,et al.  Towards an Improved Understanding of the Effects of Elevated Progesterone Levels on Human Endometrial Receptivity and Oocyte/Embryo Quality during Assisted Reproductive Technologies , 2022, Cells.

[20]  M. Meseguer,et al.  The higher the score, the better the clinical outcome: retrospective evaluation of automatic embryo grading as a support tool for embryo selection in IVF laboratories. , 2022, Human reproduction.

[21]  F. Signore,et al.  Fertility preservation in female cancer sufferers: (only) a moral obligation? , 2022, The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception.

[22]  M. Alesi,et al.  Psychological variables in medically assisted reproduction: a systematic review , 2022, Przeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review.

[23]  G. Cucinella,et al.  Open vs. closed vitrification system: which one is safer? , 2022, European review for medical and pharmacological sciences.

[24]  F. Negro,et al.  Medically assisted procreation in times of COVID-19: what impact on health care system organization and the reproductive rights of couples? , 2021, Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis.

[25]  G. Montanari Vergallo,et al.  The March 2021 Italian constitutional court ruling on surrogacy: a prelude to common European legislation for the sake of reproductive health? , 2021, The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception.

[26]  S. Podgaec,et al.  Freeze-all policy for in vitro fertilization in women with normal response to ovarian stimulation , 2021, Einstein.

[27]  Disposition of unclaimed embryos: an Ethics Committee opinion. , 2021, Fertility and sterility.

[28]  Debra J. H. Mathews,et al.  Human embryo research, stem cell-derived embryo models and in vitro gametogenesis: Considerations leading to the revised ISSCR guidelines , 2021, Stem cell reports.

[29]  A. Brivanlou,et al.  The ethics of human-embryoids model: a call for consistency , 2021, Journal of molecular medicine.

[30]  M. A. Checa,et al.  Lower risk of adverse perinatal outcomes in natural versus artificial frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2021, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[31]  G. Scambia,et al.  Non-Coding RNAs as Prognostic Markers for Endometrial Cancer , 2021, International journal of molecular sciences.

[32]  M. van Wely,et al.  Transfer of fresh or frozen embryos: a randomised controlled trial , 2021, Human reproduction.

[33]  S. Krawetz,et al.  COVID-19 and human reproduction: A pandemic that packs a serious punch , 2021, Systems biology in reproductive medicine.

[34]  F. Signore,et al.  Surrogacy and “Procreative Tourism”. What Does the Future Hold from the Ethical and Legal Perspectives? , 2021, Medicina.

[35]  J. Kiarie,et al.  IVF and other ART in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic landscape analysis , 2020, Human reproduction update.

[36]  F. Amant,et al.  ESHRE guideline: female fertility preservation† , 2020, Human reproduction open.

[37]  H. Tournaye,et al.  The freeze-all strategy versus agonist triggering with low-dose hCG for luteal phase support in IVF/ICSI for high responders: a randomized controlled trial. , 2020, Human reproduction.

[38]  Rien Janssens,et al.  Regulating the international surrogacy market:the ethics of commercial surrogacy in the Netherlands and India , 2020, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy.

[39]  A. Arav.  A recommendation for IVF lab practice in light of the current COVID-19 pandemic , 2020, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[40]  T. Li,et al.  The role of the renin–angiotensin system in regulating endometrial neovascularization during the peri-implantation period: literature review and preliminary data , 2020, Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism.

[41]  Z. Nagy,et al.  Vitrification of the human embryo: a more efficient and safer in vitro fertilization treatment. , 2020, Fertility and sterility.

[42]  N. Gleicher,et al.  Is Embryo Cryopreservation Causing Macrosomia—and What Else? , 2020, Frontiers in Endocrinology.

[43]  Á. Raya,et al.  EBCOG position statement: ethics of stem cell research. , 2020, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[44]  Sciorio Romualdo,et al.  Clinical utility of freeze-all approach in ART treatment: A mini-review. , 2019, Cryobiology.

[45]  S. Mastenbroek,et al.  Fresh versus frozen blastocyst transfer , 2019, The Lancet.

[46]  S. Marinelli.  Medically-assisted procreation and the rise of off-center, new types of "parenthood": it is incumbent upon lawmakers to intervene. , 2019, La Clinica terapeutica.

[47]  G. Ricci,et al.  The human embryo, subjectivity and legal capacity. Notes in the light of art. 1 of the Italian law on "medically assisted procreation". , 2019, La Clinica terapeutica.

[48]  Jia-yin Liu,et al.  Frozen versus fresh single blastocyst transfer in ovulatory women: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial , 2019, The Lancet.

[49]  C. Venetis,et al.  Higher probability of live-birth in high, but not normal, responders after first frozen-embryo transfer in a freeze-only cycle strategy compared to fresh-embryo transfer: a meta-analysis , 2019, Human reproduction.

[50]  Reza Ghadimi.  Population and fertility by age and sex for 195 countries and territories, 1950–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 , 2018, Lancet.

[51]  S. Crockin,et al.  Legal Issues in Gamete and Embryo Cryopreservation: An Overview , 2018, Seminars in Reproductive Medicine.

[52]  S. Geber,et al.  Obstetric outcomes after fresh versus frozen-thawed embryo transfers: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2018, JBRA assisted reproduction.

[53]  Rakhi Ghoshal.  Assisted reproductive technologies: Conundrums and challenges. , 2018, Indian journal of medical ethics.

[54]  E. Marinelli,et al.  Gamete Donation: Are Children Entitled to Know Their Genetic Origins? A Comparison of Opposing Views. The Italian State of Affairs , 2018 .

[55]  N. S. Lima.  Narrative Identity in Third Party Reproduction: Normative Aspects and Ethical Challenges , 2018, Journal of Bioethical Inquiry.

[56]  F. Signore,et al.  The issue of delivery room infections in the Italian law. A brief comparative study with English and French jurisprudence , 2018, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[57]  S. Zaami.  Assisted heterologous fertilization and the right of donorconceived children to know their biological origins. , 2018, La Clinica terapeutica.

[58]  J. Vermeesch,et al.  Recent developments in genetics and medically assisted reproduction: from research to clinical applications , 2017, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[59]  P. Navarro,et al.  Risk of Contamination of Gametes and Embryos during Cryopreservation and Measures to Prevent Cross-Contamination , 2017, BioMed research international.

[60]  G. Gullo,et al.  GnRH antagonist administered twice the day before hCG trigger combined with a step-down protocol may prevent OHSS in IVF/ICSI antagonist cycles at risk for OHSS without affecting the reproductive outcomes: a prospective randomized control trial , 2017, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[61]  Suying Liu,et al.  High oestradiol concentration after ovarian stimulation is associated with lower maternal serum beta-HCG concentration and neonatal birth weight. , 2017, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[62]  G. Cavaliere,et al.  Genome editing and assisted reproduction: curing embryos, society or prospective parents? , 2017, Medicine, health care, and philosophy.

[63]  W. Neaves.  The status of the human embryo in various religions , 2017, Development.

[64]  Z. Rosenwaks,et al.  Supraphysiologic estradiol is an independent predictor of low birth weight in full-term singletons born after fresh embryo transfer , 2017, Human reproduction.

[65]  Alla Tymofeyeva.  The Human Embryo in the Case-Law of the European Court of Human Rights , 2017 .

[66]  M. van Wely,et al.  Fresh versus frozen embryo transfers in assisted reproduction. , 2021, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[67]  I. Georgiou,et al.  How does closed system vitrification of human oocytes affect the clinical outcome? A prospective, observational, cohort, noninferiority trial in an oocyte donation program. , 2016, Fertility and sterility.

[68]  A. Conti.  Bioethics and the Italian National Bioethics Committee: historical highlights. , 2016, La Clinica terapeutica.

[69]  C. Mercer,et al.  Prevalence of infertility and help seeking among 15 000 women and men , 2016, Human reproduction.

[70]  Zi-jiang Chen,et al.  Fresh versus Frozen Embryos for Infertility in the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[71]  Z. Rosenwaks,et al.  A fresh(er) perspective on frozen embryo transfers. , 2016, Fertility and sterility.

[72]  F. Karimi,et al.  Association Between Serum Estradiol Level on the Day of hCG Administration and IVF–ICSI Outcome , 2016, The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India.

[73]  M. Sbracia,et al.  Ovarian Stimulation Protocol in IVF: An Up-to-Date Review of the Literature. , 2016, Current pharmaceutical biotechnology.

[74]  Jessica W. Giles,et al.  Parrillo v Italy: Is There Life in the European Court of Human Rights? , 2016 .

[75]  M. Nasr-Esfahani,et al.  Cytoplasmic, rather than nuclear-DNA, insufficiencies as the major cause of poor competence of vitrified oocytes. , 2015, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[76]  C. Venetis,et al.  Estimating the net effect of progesterone elevation on the day of hCG on live birth rates after IVF: a cohort analysis of 3296 IVF cycles. , 2015, Human reproduction.

[77]  S. Chamayou,et al.  Oocyte vitrification modifies nucleolar remodeling and zygote kinetics-a sibling study , 2015, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[78]  M. Gissler,et al.  Major congenital anomalies in children born after frozen embryo transfer: a cohort study 1995-2006. , 2014, Human reproduction.

[79]  S. Biondi.  Access to medical-assisted reproduction and pgd in Italian law: a deadly blow to an illiberal statute? commentary to the European Court on Human Rights's decision Costa and Pavan v Italy (ECtHR, 28 August 2012, App. 54270/2010). , 2013, Medical law review.

[80]  G. Gullo,et al.  Injection of embryo culture supernatant to the endometrial cavity does not affect outcomes in IVF/ICSI or oocyte donation cycles: a randomized clinical trial. , 2012, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[81]  A. Bielanski.  A review of the risk of contamination of semen and embryos during cryopreservation and measures to limit cross-contamination during banking to prevent disease transmission in ET practices. , 2012, Theriogenology.

[82]  P. Devroey,et al.  An OHSS-Free Clinic by segmentation of IVF treatment. , 2011, Human reproduction.

[83]  J. de Vos,et al.  Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation for In Vitro Fertilization Alters Endometrial Receptivity in Humans: Protocol Effects1 , 2010, Biology of reproduction.

[84]  V. Goossens,et al.  Assisted reproductive technology and intrauterine inseminations in Europe, 2005: results generated from European registers by ESHRE: ESHRE. The European IVF Monitoring Programme (EIM), for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). , 2009, Human reproduction.

[85]  Dong Ryul Lee,et al.  Long-term liquid nitrogen vapor storage of mouse embryos cryopreserved using vitrification or slow cooling. , 2009, Fertility and sterility.

[86]  W. Yeung,et al.  Aberrant expression of angiopoietins-1 and -2 and vascular endothelial growth factor-A in peri-implantation endometrium after gonadotrophin stimulation. , 2008, Human reproduction.

[87]  I. Freckelton.  In vitro fertilisation and the limits of consent. , 2007, Journal of law and medicine.

[88]  J. Dute.  ECHR 2006/8 Case of Evans v. The United Kingdom, 7 March 2006, no. 6339/05 (fourth section). , 2006, European journal of health law.

[89]  W. Yeung,et al.  Factors affecting endometrial and subendometrial blood flow measured by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound during IVF treatment. , 2006, Human reproduction.

[90]  A. Gómez-Lobo,et al.  The Moral Status of the Human Embryo , 2005, Perspectives in biology and medicine.

[91]  W. Yeung,et al.  Comparison of endometrial and subendometrial blood flow measured by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound between stimulated and natural cycles in the same patients. , 2004, Human reproduction.

[92]  P. Lau,et al.  Microbial contamination of embryos and semen during long term banking in liquid nitrogen. , 2003, Cryobiology.

[93]  E. Kolibianakis,et al.  Effect of ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone, gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonists, and human chorionic gonadotropin on endometrial maturation on the day of oocyte pick-up. , 2002, Fertility and sterility.

[94]  B. Böving.  IMPLANTATION , 1959, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[95]  S. Marinelli,et al.  Is there anything left of the Italian law governing medically-assisted procreation? , 2021, La Clinica terapeutica.

[96]  Qiuju Chen,et al.  Effect of in vitro culture period on birth weight after vitrified-warmed transfer cycles: analysis of 4,201 singleton newborns. , 2019, Fertility and sterility.

[97]  S. Bhattacharya,et al.  Is frozen embryo transfer better for mothers and babies? Can cumulative meta-analysis provide a definitive answer? , 2018, Human reproduction update.

[98]  R. Folescu.  THE MORAL STATUS OF THE HUMAN EMBRYO , 2015 .

[99]  Jessica W. Giles.  Costa and Pavan v Italy (Application no 54270/10): European Court of Human Rights (Second section): Tulkens (President), Popović, Berro-Lefèvre, Sajó, Raimondi, Pinto de Albuquerque, Keller, JJ, Jočienė, Karakaş, additional JJ: 28 August 2012 , 2013 .

[100]  Huanming Yang,et al.  Aseptic minimum volume vitrification technique for porcine parthenogenetically activated blastocyst. , 2011, Cryo letters.

[101]  Itziar Alkorta Idiakez.  [The Evans case and the right not to be forced to reproduce]. , 2006, Revista de derecho y genoma humano = Law and the human genome review.