Niche Width: Biogeographic Patterns Among Anolis Lizard Populations

One aspect of the niche width of a population refers to the variety of resources used by the entire population. This aspect may be measured by the variance of the population's resource-utilization function. Two components make up a population's niche width. The within-phenotype component measures the spread of resources used by the average individual in the population. The between-phenotype component measures the variety of individual specializations in the population. The sum of these two components yields the total niche width. Calculation of these measures is illustrated with data from Anolis lizards. If the population's niche width is mostly composed of the within-phenotype component, it is virtually a monomorphic population of generalists, whereas if mostly the between-phenotype component, it is virtually a population polymorphic with pure specialists. Anolis populations tend more to be monomorphic with generalists than polymorphic with specialists. Recent ecological theory entails four predictions supported by the data on Anolis populations. (1 and 2) A population incurs a smaller total niche width and becomes less polymorphic with specialists either as environmental productivity decreases or the number of competing species increases. (3) If environmental productivity decreases and the number of competing species also decreases, there is little change in the total niche width, but the population becomes less polymorphic with specialists. (4) Evolutionary compression or release of jaw-length variation occurs more slowly than displacement of average jaw length.

[1]  J. Roughgarden.  Species packing and the competition function with illustrations from coral reef fish. , 1974, Theoretical population biology.

[2]  J. S. Findley.  Phenetic Packing as a Measure of Faunal Diversity , 1973, The American Naturalist.

[3]  Jonathan Roughgarden,et al.  Evolution of Niche Width , 1972, The American Naturalist.

[4]  E. C. Pielou.  Niche Width and Niche Overlap: A Method for Measuring Them , 1972 .

[5]  R M May,et al.  Niche overlap as a function of environmental variability. , 1972, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  R. Trivers.  Parental investment and sexual selection , 1972 .

[7]  E. Williams.  The Origin of Faunas. Evolution of Lizard Congeners in a Complex Island Fauna: A Trial Analysis , 1972 .

[8]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  On the Measurement of Niche Breadth and Overlap. , 1971, Ecology.

[9]  B. McNab.  The Structure of Tropical Bat Faunas , 1971 .

[10]  R. Ruibal,et al.  Eurythermy and Niche Expansion in Lizards , 1970 .

[11]  M. Soulé,et al.  The "Niche-Variation" Hypothesis: A Test and Alternatives , 1970, The American Naturalist.

[12]  T. Schoener.  Size Patterns in West Indian Anolis Lizards: I. Size and Species Diversity , 1969 .

[13]  M. Willson.  Avian Niche Size and Morphological Variation , 1969, The American Naturalist.

[14]  R. Levins.  Evolution in Changing Environments , 1968 .

[15]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Limiting Similarity, Convergence, and Divergence of Coexisting Species , 1967, The American Naturalist.

[16]  P. Grant.  BILL LENGTH VARIABILITY IN BIRDS OF THE TRES MARÍAS ISLANDS, MEXICO , 1967 .

[17]  J. R. Tamsitt.  Niche and Species Diversity in Neotropical Bats , 1967, Nature.

[18]  S. Jain,et al.  Population Studies in Predominantly Self-Pollinating Species. X. Variation in Natural Populations of Avena fatua and A. barbata , 1967, The American Naturalist.

[19]  L. V. Valen,et al.  MORPHOLOGICAL VARIATION AND WIDTH OF ECOLOGICAL NICHE , 1965 .

[20]  R. Macarthur,et al.  Environmental Factors Affecting Bird Species Diversity , 1964, The American Naturalist.

[21]  R. Ruibal.  THERMAL RELATIONS OF FIVE SPECIES OF TROPICAL LIZARDS , 1961 .

[22]  N. L. Johnson,et al.  Multivariate Analysis , 1958, Nature.