Multiple Limit States and Expected Failure Costs for Deteriorating Reinforced Concrete Bridges

Accurate predictive analyses such as those associated with structural reliability and life-cycle costing are needed for the development of Bridge Management Systems. The present paper presents models for reliability and life-cycle cost analyses of reinforced concrete bridges damaged by corrosion. A stochastic deterioration process for corrosion initiation and propagation and then crack initiation and propagation are used to examine the effect of cracking, spalling, and loss of reinforcement area on structural strength and reliability. This will enable expected costs of failure for serviceability and ultimate strength limit states to be calculated and compared for different repair strategies and inspection intervals. It was found that, for a typical reinforced concrete slab bridge, the reduction of structural capacity at the time of severe cracking or spalling is relatively modest and causes probabilities of collapse conditional on spalling to increase by about an order of magnitude. Hence, expected costs of failure for serviceability were significantly higher than the expected costs of failure for ultimate strength limit states.

[1]  Youping Liu,et al.  Modeling the Time-to Corrosion Cracking of the Cover Concrete in Chloride Contaminated Reinforced Concrete Structures , 1996 .

[2]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Bridge Lifetime System Reliability Under Multiple Limit States , 2001 .

[3]  Philip D Cady.  BRIDGE DECK REHABILITATION DECISION MAKING , 1985 .

[4]  Dimitri V. Val,et al.  Role of Load History in Reliability-Based Decision Analysis of Aging Bridges , 1999 .

[5]  Cruz Alonso,et al.  Cover cracking as a function of rebar corrosion: Part 2—Numerical model , 1993 .

[6]  Haresh C. Shah,et al.  Engineering role in failure cost evaluation for buildings , 1997 .

[7]  Mark G. Stewart,et al.  Service Life Prediction Of Reinforced Concrete Structures Exposed To Aggressive Environments , 2002 .

[8]  Harold E. Marshall,et al.  The economics of new-technology materials:: a case study of FRP bridge decking , 1996 .

[9]  Finn M. Jensen,et al.  THE OWNER'S PERSPECTIVE IN PROBABILITY-BASED BRIDGE MANAGEMENT , 2002 .

[10]  Mark G. Stewart,et al.  Structural reliability of concrete bridges including improved chloride-induced corrosion models , 2000 .

[11]  Ravindra K. Dhir,et al.  PFA concrete: chloride-induced reinforcement corrosion , 1994 .

[12]  Robert E. Melchers,et al.  Effect of reinforcement corrosion on reliability of highway bridges , 1998 .

[13]  Palle Thoft-Christensen,et al.  Advanced bridge management systems , 1995 .

[14]  Michael Havbro Faber,et al.  Aspects of Inspection Planning: Quality and quantity , 2000 .

[15]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Repair Optimization of Highway Bridges Using System Reliability Approach , 1999 .

[16]  Bruce R. Ellingwood,et al.  MAINTAINING RELIABILITY OF CONCRETE STRUCTURES. I: ROLE OF INSPECTION/REPAIR , 1994 .

[17]  Cruz Alonso,et al.  Cover cracking as a function of bar corrosion: Part I-Experimental test , 1993 .

[18]  Mark G. Stewart,et al.  Structural Safety and Serviceability of Concrete Bridges Subject to Corrosion , 1998 .

[19]  J. Rodriguez,et al.  LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY OF CONCRETE STRUCTURES WITH CORRODED REINFORCEMENT , 1997 .