Discrete element modelling of top soil burial using a full scale mouldboard plough under field conditions

In order to improve the grain crop yield of non-wetting sandy soils, mouldboard ploughs are again being used in Australia. To improve the effectiveness of top soil burial from ploughing the most suitable operating parameters need to be determined. The discrete element method (DEM) has the potential to model soil–mouldboard plough interactions relating to both soil movement and tillage forces. A full scale mouldboard plough was tested in the field and then simulated using DEM. The draught forces predicted by DEM were of similar magnitude to those calculated using ASABE's Agricultural Machinery Management Data (D497.7 R2015). The DEM model predicted top soil burial to a similar depth in the soil profile as was measured in the field. However, DEM predictions of lateral and forward soil movements of the buried top soil were greater than that measured in the field. The DEM predictions showed that increasing speed from 5 to 15 km h −1 gave a 40% increase in draught and a significant reduction in the depth of top soil burial. Increasing the tillage depth from 200 to 350 mm gave a 270% increase in draught but very little change in depth of burial of the top soil. The use of a skimmer was predicted to increase the draught by 4% and increase the amount of top soil buried below 100 mm depth.

[1]  I. Shmulevich,et al.  Interaction between soil and a wide cutting blade using the discrete element method , 2007 .

[2]  Chris Saunders,et al.  Three-dimensional discrete element modelling of tillage: Determination of a suitable contact model and parameters for a cohesionless soil , 2014 .

[3]  Tavs Nyord,et al.  A discrete element model for soil–sweep interaction in three different soils , 2013 .

[4]  Omar González Cueto,et al.  Prediction model for non-inversion soil tillage implemented on discrete element method , 2014 .

[5]  Chris Saunders,et al.  3D DEM tillage simulation: Validation of a hysteretic spring (plastic) contact model for a sweep tool operating in a cohesionless soil , 2014 .

[6]  Toshitsugu Tanaka,et al.  3-D DEM simulation of cohesive soil-pushing behavior by bulldozer blade , 2012 .

[7]  K. Oost,et al.  Soil translocation resulting from multiple passes of tillage under normal field operating conditions , 2006 .

[8]  Ying Chen,et al.  Feasibility of using PFC3D to simulate soil flow resulting from a simple soil-engaging tool. , 2015 .

[9]  J. Keith Nisbett,et al.  Shigley's Mechanical Engineering Design , 1983 .

[10]  R. L. Braun,et al.  Stress calculations for assemblies of inelastic speres in uniform shear , 1986 .

[11]  P. Eberhard,et al.  A discrete element model and its experimental validation for the prediction of draft forces in cohesive soil , 2014 .

[12]  Sheng Li,et al.  Tillage translocation and tillage erosion in cereal-based production in Manitoba, Canada , 2007 .

[13]  Ying Chen,et al.  Modeling of soil–claw interaction using the discrete element method (DEM) , 2016 .

[14]  Yuan Wang,et al.  Statistical analysis of sand grain/bed collision process recorded by high‐speed digital camera , 2008 .

[15]  Itzhak Shmulevich,et al.  Determination of discrete element model parameters required for soil tillage , 2007 .

[16]  A. Mouazen,et al.  Modelling soil-sweep interaction with discrete element method , 2013 .

[17]  Chris Saunders,et al.  Discrete element modelling of tillage forces and soil movement of a one-third scale mouldboard plough , 2017 .