Quantifying sequential subsumption

Abstract Subsumption is used in knowledge representation and ontology to describe the relationship between concepts. Concept A is subsumed by concept B if the extension of A is always a subset of the extension of B, irrespective of the interpretation. The subsumption relation is also useful in other data analysis tasks such as pattern recognition – for example in image analysis to detect objects in an image, and in spectral data analysis to detect the presence of a reference pattern in a given spectrum. Sometimes the subsumption relation may not be 100% true, so it is useful to quantify this relationship. In this paper we study how to quantify subsumption for sequential patterns. We review existing work on subsumption, give an axiomatic characterisation of subsumption, and present one general approach to quantification in terms of set intersection operation over concept extension. Constructing the concept extension set explicitly is impossible without specifying the domain of discourse and the interpretation. Instead, we focus on concept intension for sequences as patterns and propose to represent concept intension of a sequence by its subsequences. We further consider different types of concept intension set – subsequence set, subsequence multiset, embedding set and embedding set with constraints such as warping and selection. We then present a general algorithmic framework for computing set intersections, and specific algorithms for computing different concept intension sets. We also present an experimental evaluation of these algorithms with regard to their runtime performance.

[1]  Shyamanta M. Hazarika,et al.  Formal concept analysis: current trends and directions , 2013, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[2]  Rafael Peñaloza,et al.  Consistency reasoning in lattice-based fuzzy Description Logics , 2014, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[3]  Hui Wang,et al.  Kernels for acyclic digraphs , 2012, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[4]  Louis Ranjard,et al.  Unsupervised bird song syllable classification using evolving neural networks. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Hui Wang,et al.  Versatile string kernels , 2013, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[6]  Hector J. Levesque,et al.  The Tractability of Subsumption in Frame-Based Description Languages , 1984, AAAI.

[7]  Stefano Ferilli,et al.  A Complete Subsumption Algorithm , 2003, AI*IA.

[8]  Taha Sochi New program with new approach for spectral data analysis , 2013 .

[9]  Apostolos Syropoulos,et al.  Mathematics of Multisets , 2000, WMP.

[10]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Face Description with Local Binary Patterns: Application to Face Recognition , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[11]  Umberto Straccia,et al.  fuzzyDL: An expressive fuzzy description logic reasoner , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence).

[12]  Volker Haarslev,et al.  Tableau-Based Reasoning , 2009, Handbook on Ontologies.

[13]  F. Carré,et al.  Numerical Classification of Soil Profile Data Using Distance Metrics , 2009 .

[14]  Hui Wang,et al.  Differentiation of Apple Varieties and Investigation of Organic Status Using Portable Visible Range Reflectance Spectroscopy , 2018, Sensors.

[15]  William A. Woods,et al.  Understanding Subsumption and Taxonomy: A Framework for Progress , 1991, Principles of Semantic Networks.

[16]  Eduardo Mena,et al.  On the generalization of the discovery of subsumption relationships to the fuzzy case , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE).

[17]  Franz Baader Description Logics , 2009, Reasoning Web.

[18]  Gourab Sen Gupta,et al.  Hough Transform Run Length Encoding for Real-Time Image Processing , 2007, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas..

[19]  Cees H. Elzinga,et al.  Sequence Similarity , 2003 .

[20]  Omar Nibouche,et al.  Nearest clusters based partial least squares discriminant analysis for the classification of spectral data. , 2018, Analytica chimica acta.

[21]  Sven Rahmann,et al.  Algorithms for subsequence combinatorics , 2008, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[22]  Rafael Peñaloza,et al.  The Complexity of Subsumption in Fuzzy EL , 2015, IJCAI.

[23]  Eun-Soo Kim,et al.  Fast computation of hologram patterns of a 3D object using run-length encoding and novel look-up table methods. , 2009, Applied optics.

[24]  Aart C. Liefbroer,et al.  Standardization of pathways to adulthood? an analysis of Dutch cohorts born between 1850 and 1900 , 2010, Demography.

[25]  Rafael Peñaloza,et al.  Positive Subsumption in Fuzzy EL with General t-Norms , 2013, IJCAI.

[26]  Zhiwei Lin,et al.  Concordance and consensus , 2011, Inf. Sci..

[27]  W. Imrich,et al.  Handbook of Product Graphs, Second Edition , 2011 .

[28]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  Identity and Subsumption , 2002 .

[29]  Steve Awodey,et al.  Category Theory , 2006 .

[30]  Chengjun Liu,et al.  New image descriptors based on color, texture, shape, and wavelets for object and scene image classification , 2013, Neurocomputing.

[31]  Reinhard Diestel,et al.  Graph Theory , 1997 .

[32]  John Yen,et al.  Generalizing Term Subsumption Languages to Fuzzy Logic , 1991, IJCAI.