Actions & Imagined Actions in Cognitive robots

Natural/Artificial systems that are capable of utilizing thoughts at the service of their actions are gifted with the profound opportunity to mentally manipulate the causal structure of their physical interactions with the environment. A cognitive robot can in this way virtually reason about how an unstructured world should ‘change’, such that it becomes a little bit more conducive towards realization of its internal goals. In this article, we describe the various internal models for real/mental action generation developed in the GNOSYS Cognitive architecture and demonstrate how their coupled interactions can endow the GNOSYS robot with a preliminary ability to virtually manipulate neural activity in its mental space in order to initiate flexible goal directed behavior in its physical space. Making things more interesting (and computationally challenging) is the fact that the environment in which the robot seeks to achieve its goals consists of specially crafted ‘stick and ball’ versions of real experimental scenarios from animal reasoning (like tool use in chimps, novel tool construction in Caledonian crows, the classic trap tube paradigm and their possible combinations). We specifically focus on the progressive creation of the following internal models in the behavioral repertoire of the robot a) a passive motion paradigm based forward inverse model for mental simulation / real execution of goal directed arm (and arm+tool) movements; b) a spatial mental map of the playground; c) an internal model representing the causality of pushing objects and further learning to push intelligently in order to avoid randomly placed traps in the trapping groove. After presenting the computational architecture for the internal models, we demonstrate how the robot can use them to mentally compose a sequence of ‘Push-MoveReach’ in order to Grasp (an otherwise unreachable) ball in its playground.

[1]  M. Zak Terminal attractors for addressable memory in neural networks , 1988 .

[2]  Bernd Fritzke,et al.  A Growing Neural Gas Network Learns Topologies , 1994, NIPS.

[3]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Self-Organizing Maps , 2010 .

[4]  Toshio Tsuji,et al.  Motion Planning for Manipulators Using Artificial Potential Field Approach that can Adjust Convergence Time of Generated Arm Trajectory , 1995 .

[5]  E. Visalberghi,et al.  Acting and understanding: Tool use revisited through the minds of capuchin monkeys , 1996 .

[6]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  The Belief-Desire-Intention Model of Agency , 1998, ATAL.

[7]  Richard S. Sutton,et al.  Dimensions of Reinforcement Learning , 1998 .

[8]  Tj Sejnowski,et al.  Neural Codes and Distributed Representations , 1999 .

[9]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[10]  G. Hesslow Conscious thought as simulation of behaviour and perception , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  A. Kacelnik,et al.  Shaping of Hooks in New Caledonian Crows , 2002, Science.

[12]  Marc Toussaint,et al.  Learning a World Model and Planning with a Self-Organizing, Dynamic Neural System , 2003, NIPS.

[13]  Owen Holland,et al.  Robots With Internal Models A Route to Machine Consciousness , 2003 .

[14]  P. Morasso,et al.  Kinematic networks , 1988, Biological Cybernetics.

[15]  S. Amari Dynamics of pattern formation in lateral-inhibition type neural fields , 1977, Biological Cybernetics.

[16]  Nicola S. Clayton,et al.  The Mentality of Crows: Convergent Evolution of Intelligence in Corvids and Apes , 2004, Science.

[17]  Rick Grush,et al.  The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[18]  Marc Toussaint,et al.  A Sensorimotor Map: Modulating Lateral Interactions for Anticipation and Planning , 2006, Neural Computation.

[19]  Pietro G. Morasso,et al.  Towards Reasoning and Coordinating Action in the Mental Space , 2007, Int. J. Neural Syst..

[20]  Germund Hesslow,et al.  The inner world of a simple robot , 2007 .