Iterative algorithm for multiple illumination photoacoustic tomography (MIPAT) using ultrasound channel data

Photoacoustic tomography is a promising imaging modality offering high ultrasonic resolution with intrinsic optical contrast. However, quantification in photoacoustic imaging is challenging. We present an algorithm for quantitative photoacoustic estimation of optical absorption and diffusion coefficients based on minimizing an error function between measured photoacoustic channel data and a calculated forward model with a multiple-illumination pattern. Unlike many other algorithms, the proposed method does not require the erroneous assumption of ideal tomographic reconstruction of initial pressures and to our knowledge is the first demonstration of the efficacy of multiple-illumination photoacoustic tomography requiring only transducer channel data. Simulations show promise for numerically robust optical property estimation as illustrated by well-conditioned Hessian singular values in 2D examples.

[1]  Simon R Arridge,et al.  Two-dimensional quantitative photoacoustic image reconstruction of absorption distributions in scattering media by use of a simple iterative method. , 2006, Applied optics.

[2]  Guillaume Bal,et al.  On multi-spectral quantitative photoacoustic tomography in diffusive regime , 2012 .

[3]  S. Arridge,et al.  Estimating chromophore distributions from multiwavelength photoacoustic images. , 2009, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[4]  Lihong V Wang,et al.  Compressed sensing in photoacoustic tomography in vivo. , 2010, Journal of biomedical optics.

[5]  Qiang Wang,et al.  Tomographic imaging of absolute optical absorption coefficient in turbid media using combined photoacoustic and diffusing light measurements. , 2007, Optics letters.

[6]  Vasilis Ntziachristos,et al.  Performance of iterative optoacoustic tomography with experimental data , 2009 .

[7]  S. Arridge,et al.  Quantitative spectroscopic photoacoustic imaging: a review. , 2012, Journal of biomedical optics.

[8]  Huabei Jiang,et al.  Quantitative photoacoustic tomography: Recovery of optical absorption coefficient maps of heterogeneous media , 2006 .

[9]  Lihong V. Wang,et al.  Biomedical Optics: Principles and Imaging , 2007 .

[10]  Qiang Wang,et al.  Quantitative photoacoustic tomography: recovery of optical absorption coefficient maps of heterogeneous media , 2007, SPIE BiOS.

[11]  R. Zemp,et al.  Estimating optical absorption, scattering, and Grueneisen distributions with multiple-illumination photoacoustic tomography. , 2011, Applied optics.

[12]  Roger J Zemp Quantitative photoacoustic tomography with multiple optical sources. , 2010, Applied optics.

[13]  Guillaume Bal,et al.  Multi-source quantitative photoacoustic tomography in a diffusive regime , 2011 .

[14]  Debasish Roy,et al.  Quantitative photoacoustic tomography from boundary pressure measurements: noniterative recovery of optical absorption coefficient from the reconstructed absorbed energy map. , 2008, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[15]  Lihong V. Wang,et al.  Tutorial on Photoacoustic Microscopy and Computed Tomography , 2008, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics.

[16]  Minghua Xu,et al.  Analytic explanation of spatial resolution related to bandwidth and detector aperture size in thermoacoustic or photoacoustic reconstruction. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[17]  Stanley Osher,et al.  Bregman methods in quantitative photoacoustic tomography , 2010 .

[18]  Vasilis Ntziachristos,et al.  Quantitative point source photoacoustic inversion formulas for scattering and absorbing media. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.