A double bending lightwand can provide more successful endotracheal intubation in patients with a short thyromental distance: a prospective randomised study

Background and objective This study assessed the efficacy of endotracheal intubation using a double bending lightwand in patients with an anticipated difficult airway because of a short thyromental distance. Methods On the basis of the shape of the lightwand used, 68 patients with a thyromental distance of less than 65 mm undergoing general anaesthesia were randomly allocated to one of two groups. In the conventional bending group (n = 34), the lightwand was bent at 6.5 cm from the distal end to 90° angle. In the double bending group (n = 34), the lightwand was bent 30° at 15 cm from its tip in addition to the conventional bending. The ease of insertion was assessed by the lightwand search time and success rate at the first attempt. Post-operative complications, if any, were noted. Results The success rate of intubation at the first attempt was higher for the double bending group (94 vs. 74%, P < 0.05). The search time was significantly shorter in the double bending group than the conventional bending group (10 ± 6 vs. 15 ± 8 s, P < 0.01). Mean blood pressure and heart rate increased after intubation in both groups (P < 0.05), but there were no significant differences between the groups. The incidence of post-operative sore throat and mucosal bleeding was not significantly different between the groups. Conclusion We conclude that the double bending lightwand is associated with a greater success rate of intubation in patients with an anticipated difficult airway because of a short thyromental distance.

[1]  B. Allaouchiche,et al.  What is the optimal remifentanil dosage for providing excellent intubating conditions when coadministered with thiopental? A prospective randomized dose–response study , 2010, European journal of anaesthesiology.

[2]  Scott A. Miller,et al.  A novel technique for learning to intubate with the lightwand. , 2009, European journal of anaesthesiology.

[3]  X. Liao,et al.  Lightwand guided intubation in paediatric patients with a known difficult airway: a report of four cases , 2008, Anaesthesia.

[4]  J. Hall,et al.  A comparison of the use of Trachlight® and Eschmann multiple‐use introducer in simulated difficult intubation , 2007, European journal of anaesthesiology.

[5]  J. Canet,et al.  Lightwand Tracheal Intubation with and without Muscle Relaxation , 2006, Anesthesiology.

[6]  D. Wong,et al.  Cardiothoracic anesthesia, respiration and airway modified mallampati test, thyromental distance and inter-incisor gap are the best predictors of difficult laryngoscopy in West Africans , 2005, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[7]  N. Coskunfirat,et al.  Factors influencing time of intubation with a lightwand device in patients without known airway abnormality. , 2004, Journal of clinical anesthesia.

[8]  Wei-Zen Sun,et al.  Does the Suggested Lightwand Bent Length Fit Every Patient?: The Relation between Bent Length and Patient's Thyroid Prominence–to–Mandibular Angle Distance , 2003, Anesthesiology.

[9]  M. Schreiner,et al.  Lighted Stylet Tracheal Intubation: A Review , 2000, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[10]  K. Hanaoka,et al.  Optimal length and angle of a new lightwand device (Trachlight). , 1999, Journal of clinical anesthesia.

[11]  O. Hung,et al.  Clinical Trial of a New Lightwand Device (Trachlight) to Intubate the Trachea , 1995, Anesthesiology.

[12]  R. Holzman,et al.  Lightwand intubation in children with abnormal upper airways. , 1988, Anesthesiology.